Reducing Distress in Caregivers of Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation With Remotely Accessible Interventions: An Integrative Review.

Jessica Osburn, Ashley Martinez, Joyce Dains
Author Information
  1. Jessica Osburn: From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  2. Ashley Martinez: From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  3. Joyce Dains: From The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an intensive treatment requiring the support of a caregiver. This role is a highly demanding responsibility, and caregivers often face distress. In a world that has become highly technological, the aim of this integrative review is to determine the availability and impact of remote interventions in reducing distress in caregivers of HSCT patients. A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. The search included articles published between January 1, 2013, and February 20, 2023. The search yielded 699 unique articles, of which four were included in the final review. The four included studies of the impact of remote interventions on distress or burden in caregivers of adult HSCT patients. Two organizing themes emerged: availability and impact. Availability encompassed intervention accessibility and delivery type while impact considered caregiver quality of life (QOL), mental health, and perceived usefulness. These themes were evaluated in the articles via a variety of validated assessment tools and structured interviews. Ultimately, this integrative review suggests that while remote interventions for caregivers of patients undergoing HSCT are relatively limited, initial studies are perceived as useful and are promising in their potential to improve caregiver QOL and mental health and reduce distress.

References

  1. Am J Health Promot. 2021 Sep;35(7):1042-1045 [PMID: 34351244]
  2. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9039-9047 [PMID: 35951098]
  3. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  4. Psychooncology. 2021 Apr;30(4):520-528 [PMID: 33217070]
  5. Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jan;30(1):227-235 [PMID: 34255180]
  6. JMIR Cancer. 2019 May 03;5(1):e11406 [PMID: 31066678]
  7. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jun;27(6):2103-2112 [PMID: 30232587]
  8. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016 Nov;51(11):1416-1422 [PMID: 27295270]
  9. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018 Jun;13(3):155-163 [PMID: 29705880]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HSCTcaregiversdistressreviewimpactcaregiverremoteinterventionspatientsincludedarticlesHematopoietichighlyintegrativeavailabilitysearchfourstudiesthemesQOLmentalhealthperceivedstemcelltransplantationintensivetreatmentrequiringsupportroledemandingresponsibilityoftenfaceworldbecometechnologicalaimdeterminereducingliteratureconductedusingPubMedScopusdatabasespublishedJanuary12013February202023yielded699uniquefinalburdenadultTwoorganizingemerged:AvailabilityencompassedinterventionaccessibilitydeliverytypeconsideredqualitylifeusefulnessevaluatedviavarietyvalidatedassessmenttoolsstructuredinterviewsUltimatelysuggestsundergoingrelativelylimitedinitialusefulpromisingpotentialimprovereduceReducingDistressCaregiversPatientsUndergoingStemCellTransplantationRemotelyAccessibleInterventions:IntegrativeReview

Similar Articles

Cited By