The Verbal Irony Questionnaire: An Initial Approach to the Conceptualization and Measurement of Verbal Irony in High Intellectual Ability.

Sylvia Sastre-Riba, Francisco J Ruiz de Mendoza Ib����ez, Ignasi Navarro I Ferrando, Mar��a Luz Urraca-Mart��nez, Ramon Cladellas-Pros
Author Information
  1. Sylvia Sastre-Riba: Department of Educational Sciences, Universidad de La Rioja, C/Luis de Ulloa, 26004 Logro��o, Spain. ORCID
  2. Francisco J Ruiz de Mendoza Ib����ez: Department of English Language, Universidad de La Rioja, 26004 Logro��o, Spain. ORCID
  3. Ignasi Navarro I Ferrando: Department of English Studies, Universidad Jaume I, 12006 Castell��n, Spain.
  4. Mar��a Luz Urraca-Mart��nez: Department of Educational Sciences, Universidad de La Rioja, C/Luis de Ulloa, 26004 Logro��o, Spain.
  5. Ramon Cladellas-Pros: Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Universidad Aut��noma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

Figurative language is a complex construct related to intelligence. Psychology and psycholinguistics are trying to understand it from an interdisciplinary perspective, but studies are still scarce, methodologies are heterogeneous, and results are difficult to integrate. Some studies suggest that understanding the cognitive processes underlying figurative language and its forms could provide a new approach to understanding intellectual differences, such as high intellectual ability (HIA), and new instruments to assess it. The language of HIA children develops earlier and includes the use of irony, which involves metalinguistic skills. In this context, the present study aims to offer an instrument, called the verbal irony questionnaire (or VIrQ), to test the comprehension of verbal irony in students with HIA. A convenience sample of = 169 students with HIA, aged between 7 and 15 years, responded to the VIrQ. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted. The results revealed that 33 items were retained and categorized into four factors. F1, ironic dissociation (14 items); F2, ironic attitude (8 items); F3, ironic constructions (7 items); and F4, reinforced irony echo (4 items). All factors have adequate reliability indices above 0.70 and below 0.95. Finally, new perspectives are also discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Med Educ. 2011 Jun 27;2:53-55 [PMID: 28029643]
  2. Neuropsychologia. 2018 Sep;118(Pt A):20-28 [PMID: 29447843]
  3. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003 May-Jun;18(3):219-38 [PMID: 12802165]
  4. Mem Cognit. 2013 Feb;41(2):255-67 [PMID: 23055118]
  5. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Jan 17;37(1):173-185 [PMID: 34100534]
  6. J Intell. 2023 Jul 15;11(7): [PMID: 37504784]
  7. Cortex. 2019 Jun;115:112-122 [PMID: 30807881]
  8. Rev Neurol. 2017 Feb 24;64(s01):S51-S58 [PMID: 28256687]
  9. Sci Rep. 2021 May 21;11(1):10685 [PMID: 34021200]
  10. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 08;7:330 [PMID: 23847503]

Grants

  1. PDC2021-121526-I00 and PID2020-118349GB-I00/MICIU/AEI/10.13039/501100011033(Spain)

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0ironyitemslanguageHIAnewintellectualverbalironicintelligencestudiesresultsunderstandingfigurativehighabilityVIrQstudents7factors0VerbalIronyFigurativecomplexconstructrelatedPsychologypsycholinguisticstryingunderstandinterdisciplinaryperspectivestillscarcemethodologiesheterogeneousdifficultintegratesuggestcognitiveprocessesunderlyingformsprovideapproachdifferencesinstrumentsassesschildrendevelopsearlierincludesuseinvolvesmetalinguisticskillscontextpresentstudyaimsofferinstrumentcalledquestionnairetestcomprehensionconveniencesample=169aged15yearsrespondedexploratoryfactoranalysisconductedrevealed33retainedcategorizedfourF1dissociation14F2attitude8F3constructionsF4reinforcedecho4adequatereliabilityindices7095FinallyperspectivesalsodiscussedQuestionnaire:InitialApproachConceptualizationMeasurementHighIntellectualAbilitycreativitymeasure

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.