Sex Differences in Intelligence on the WISC: A Meta-Analysis on Children with Specific Learning Disabilities.

Lorenzo Esposito, David Giofr��
Author Information
  1. Lorenzo Esposito: DISFOR, University of Genoa, Corso Andrea Podest��, 2, 16121 Genova, Italy. ORCID
  2. David Giofr��: DISFOR, University of Genoa, Corso Andrea Podest��, 2, 16121 Genova, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

Several studies have examined performance on the Wechsler batteries in typically developing children and adolescents. In particular, some studies suggest that cognitive functioning may differ between males and females. In this framework, the present study aims to investigate, through a meta-analytical approach, whether there are sex differences in the profiles emerging from the WISC battery in children with a Specific Learning Disability. For this purpose, a systematic search was conducted, resulting in a final selection of 12 published studies which utilized the WISC and included at least one group of SLD children of similar ages. Scores obtained in each scale and subtest of the battery were then examined according to the CHC/WISC-V classification. A series of mixed-effects models were fitted to meta-analyze the data. The results highlight some differences favoring males, and others advantaging females. On the one hand, males exhibited higher performances in crystallized intelligence, visual processing, and quantitative knowledge. On the other hand, females showed better performance in short-term memory and processing speed. Nevertheless, no differences in fluid reasoning emerged, which probably did not prompt differences in overall intellectual functioning. From a practical and implications point of view, understanding sex-specific differences seems to be of pivotal importance, since it might trigger the development of ad hoc intervention programs in the clinical and educational context.

Keywords

References

  1. J Sch Psychol. 2018 Apr;67:104-118 [PMID: 29571527]
  2. Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):1174-204 [PMID: 24773502]
  3. J Intell. 2023 Aug 07;11(8): [PMID: 37623542]
  4. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1987 Jan;28(1):173-80 [PMID: 3558534]
  5. Psychol Rep. 1991 Dec;69(3 Pt 1):1009-10 [PMID: 1784648]
  6. Assessment. 2022 Sep;29(6):1117-1133 [PMID: 33794661]
  7. J Learn Disabil. 1985 Oct;18(8):449-54 [PMID: 4056609]
  8. Behav Brain Res. 2016 Feb 1;298(Pt B):78-90 [PMID: 26542812]
  9. J Learn Disabil. 1980 Dec;13(10):563-7 [PMID: 7240931]
  10. Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210 [PMID: 27919275]
  11. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Oct;23(9-10):930-940 [PMID: 29198282]
  12. Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Jun;89(2):195-224 [PMID: 29869412]
  13. Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan;136(1):103-127 [PMID: 20063928]
  14. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):67-90 [PMID: 35867343]
  15. J Learn Disabil. 1990 Feb;23(2):74-84 [PMID: 2406355]
  16. Cogn Process. 2024 Nov;25(4):663-672 [PMID: 38748044]
  17. Psychol Assess. 2014 Mar;26(1):207-14 [PMID: 24188149]
  18. Br J Educ Psychol. 2006 Sep;76(Pt 3):463-80 [PMID: 16953957]
  19. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  20. J Clin Psychol. 1980 Oct;36(4):953-7 [PMID: 7440744]
  21. Brain Cogn. 2003 Jul;52(2):197-204 [PMID: 12821102]
  22. Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Sep;35(9):2224-30 [PMID: 24927516]
  23. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 Mar;13(2):190-193 [PMID: 29592654]
  24. Percept Mot Skills. 1991 Dec;73(3 Pt 2):1225-6 [PMID: 1805176]
  25. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2015 Sep-Oct;6(5):419-26 [PMID: 26267702]
  26. Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jan;18(1):37-45 [PMID: 24246136]
  27. Percept Mot Skills. 1989 Aug;69(1):115-25 [PMID: 2780171]
  28. J Sch Psychol. 2021 Oct;88:101-117 [PMID: 34625207]
  29. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;3(6):518-31 [PMID: 26158978]
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014;65:373-98 [PMID: 23808917]
  31. J Learn Disabil. 1983 Aug-Sep;16(7):407-15 [PMID: 6631196]
  32. Psychol Bull. 2021 Apr;147(4):352-398 [PMID: 34166005]
  33. Am Psychol. 2012 Feb-Mar;67(2):130-59 [PMID: 22233090]
  34. Int J Neurosci. 1990 Jan;50(1-2):95-102 [PMID: 2269604]
  35. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):307-334 [PMID: 27357955]
  36. J Intell. 2023 Sep 05;11(9): [PMID: 37754907]
  37. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2016 Jun;38:53-6 [PMID: 26953847]
  38. Psychol Assess. 2013 Jun;25(2):477-83 [PMID: 23397927]
  39. Psychol Assess. 2018 Jun;30(6):793-808 [PMID: 29283593]
  40. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 29;9(7):e103537 [PMID: 25072465]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0differencesstudieschildrenmalesfemalesWISCexaminedperformancefunctioningsexbatterySpecificLearningonehandintelligenceprocessingSeveralWechslerbatteriestypicallydevelopingadolescentsparticularsuggestcognitivemaydifferframeworkpresentstudyaimsinvestigatemeta-analyticalapproachwhetherprofilesemergingDisabilitypurposesystematicsearchconductedresultingfinalselection12publishedutilizedincludedleastgroupSLDsimilaragesScoresobtainedscalesubtestaccordingCHC/WISC-Vclassificationseriesmixed-effectsmodelsfittedmeta-analyzedataresultshighlightfavoringothersadvantagingexhibitedhigherperformancescrystallizedvisualquantitativeknowledgeshowedbettershort-termmemoryspeedNeverthelessfluidreasoningemergedprobablypromptoverallintellectualpracticalimplicationspointviewunderstandingsex-specificseemspivotalimportancesincemighttriggerdevelopmentadhocinterventionprogramsclinicaleducationalcontextSexDifferencesIntelligenceWISC:Meta-AnalysisChildrenDisabilitiesmeta-analysisspecificlearningdisabilities

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.