Analgesic efficacy of transcranial combined peripheral magnetic stimulation in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a fNIRS study.

Chong Li, Jing Hu, Chengqi He
Author Information
  1. Chong Li: Rehabilitation Medicine Center and Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  2. Jing Hu: Rehabilitation Medicine Center and Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
  3. Chengqi He: Rehabilitation Medicine Center and Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China - hxkfhcq2015@126.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic stimulation has a potential therapeutic effect on patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP). However, the efficacy and underlying brain mechanisms of closed-loop magnetic stimulation for CNLBP remain unclear.
AIM: This study aims to investigate the analgesic efficacy and brain activation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) in patients with CNLBP.
DESIGN: This was a single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Huashan Hospital.
POPULATION: CNLBP.
METHODS: Thirty patients with CNLBP were randomly allocated into the experimental group and control group, with fifteen patients in each group. patients in both groups received CNLBP-related health education. On this basis, patients in the experimental group received a two-week rTMS combined with rPMS treatment, while the control group received rPMS treatment combined with sham-rTMS stimulation. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Neurometer CPT sensory nerve quantitative detector were used to evaluate the participants before and after treatment. In addition, functional near-infrared imaging (fNIRS) was employed to ascertain participants' brain function.
RESULTS: After treatment, both groups exhibited a significant decrease in VAS and ODI scores compared to their pre-treatment levels (all P<0.05). While there was no statistical significance between the two groups. Neurometer CPT revealed that the experimental group improved the pain threshold of C-fiber on the unaffected side (P=0.036). In addition, compared with the control group, the experimental group exhibited a notable increase in the activation of the somatosensory association cortex (SAC) region and an improvement in the functional connectivity of brain regions, including SAC and the primary motor cortex (PMC), after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining rTMS with rPMS can significantly relieve pain and remodel brain regions in individuals with CNLBP. This closed-loop rehabilitation model paradigm merits additional clinical investigation and implementation.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Magnetic stimulation therapy based on closed-loop rehabilitation mode has a good prospect for clinical rehabilitation for patients with CNLBP.

References

  1. Clin J Pain. 2018 Mar;34(3):237-261 [PMID: 28719509]
  2. J Neurosci. 2011 May 18;31(20):7540-50 [PMID: 21593339]
  3. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Oct;45(2):229-37 [PMID: 26092329]
  4. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37 [PMID: 22231424]
  5. Pain. 2018 Mar;159(3):416-426 [PMID: 29140928]
  6. N Engl J Med. 2022 Aug 4;387(5):479 [PMID: 35921470]
  7. Front Mol Neurosci. 2022 Apr 12;15:887426 [PMID: 35493324]
  8. Pain Res Manag. 2019 Aug 15;2019:8957847 [PMID: 31511784]
  9. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Sep;104(9):1526-1538 [PMID: 37116558]
  10. Pain Med. 2011 Jul;12(7):1041-5 [PMID: 21668750]
  11. Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2791-2803 [PMID: 29971708]
  12. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 4;4:CD013815 [PMID: 37014979]
  13. BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e045504 [PMID: 33762244]
  14. J Biomed Phys Eng. 2024 Oct 01;14(5):435-446 [PMID: 39391282]
  15. Eur J Cancer. 2019 Nov;121:55-63 [PMID: 31561134]
  16. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023 May 22;5(6):e316-e329 [PMID: 37273833]
  17. Neurotherapeutics. 2014 Jul;11(3):553-63 [PMID: 24850309]
  18. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017 Feb;18(2):86-100 [PMID: 28003656]
  19. Disabil Rehabil. 2017 May;39(9):856-866 [PMID: 27494799]
  20. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736-747 [PMID: 27745712]
  21. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016 Dec;37(8):527-535 [PMID: 27548757]
  22. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14 [PMID: 14622683]
  23. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020 Jun;21(8):857-861 [PMID: 32124653]
  24. Front Cell Neurosci. 2022 Sep 02;16:982881 [PMID: 36119128]
  25. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021 Jan;22(1):109-119 [PMID: 32885995]
  26. Front Neurol. 2020 Feb 18;11:114 [PMID: 32132973]
  27. Brain. 2008 Aug;131(Pt 8):2161-71 [PMID: 18669505]
  28. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019 Nov 1;9(11): [PMID: 30559253]
  29. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2015 Apr;21(4):361-5 [PMID: 25630889]
  30. Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Feb;131(2):474-528 [PMID: 31901449]
  31. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 15;25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952 [PMID: 11074683]
  32. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43 [PMID: 11491192]
  33. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2:S192-300 [PMID: 16550448]
  34. Brain. 2021 Dec 16;144(11):3328-3339 [PMID: 34196698]
  35. Muscle Nerve. 1999 Apr;22(4):523-31 [PMID: 10204790]
  36. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jul;52(7):425-431 [PMID: 35584029]
  37. Spine J. 2011 Jul;11(7):622-32 [PMID: 21601533]
  38. In Vivo. 2021 Jan-Feb;35(1):623-627 [PMID: 33402518]
  39. Pain Pract. 2024 Apr;24(4):647-658 [PMID: 38102884]

MeSH Term

Humans
Low Back Pain
Male
Female
Double-Blind Method
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Adult
Middle Aged
Pain Measurement
Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared
Treatment Outcome
Chronic Pain
Disability Evaluation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0groupstimulationCNLBPpatientsbraintreatmentmagneticcombinedrPMSexperimentalpainefficacyclosed-looprTMScontrolgroupsreceivedrehabilitationMagneticchronicnonspecificlowbackstudyactivationrepetitivetranscranialperipheralVASODINeurometerCPTadditionfunctionalfNIRSexhibitedcomparedcortexSACregionsclinicalBACKGROUND:potentialtherapeuticeffectHoweverunderlyingmechanismsremainunclearAIM:aimsinvestigateanalgesicDESIGN:single-centerdouble-blindrandomizedcontrolledtrialSETTING:HuashanHospitalPOPULATION:METHODS:ThirtyrandomlyallocatedfifteenPatientsCNLBP-relatedhealtheducationbasistwo-weeksham-rTMSVisualanaloguescaleOswestryDisabilityIndexsensorynervequantitativedetectorusedevaluateparticipantsnear-infraredimagingemployedascertainparticipants'functionRESULTS:significantdecreasescorespre-treatmentlevelsP<005statisticalsignificancetworevealedimprovedthresholdC-fiberunaffectedsideP=0036notableincreasesomatosensoryassociationregionimprovementconnectivityincludingprimarymotorPMCCONCLUSIONS:CombiningcansignificantlyrelieveremodelindividualsmodelparadigmmeritsadditionalinvestigationimplementationCLINICALREHABILITATIONIMPACT:therapybasedmodegoodprospectAnalgesicpain:

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.