OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Journal of nutritional science
2025;14 e19.

Association between healthy beverage index and healthy beverage score with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Kimia Leilami, Zahra Mahmoudi, Zahra Ghazimpradi, Mehran Nouri, Atefeh Torabi Ardekani, Fariba Moradi Ardekani, Morteza Zare, Seyed Jalil Masoumi
Author Information
  1. Kimia Leilami: Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  2. Zahra Mahmoudi: Department of Nutrition, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
  3. Zahra Ghazimpradi: Department of Nutrition, Qazvin university of medical science, Qazvin, Iran.
  4. Mehran Nouri: Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran. ORCID
  5. Atefeh Torabi Ardekani: Center for Cohort Study of SUMS Employees' Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  6. Fariba Moradi Ardekani: Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  7. Morteza Zare: Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  8. Seyed Jalil Masoumi: Nutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
PMID: 40028377 DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.65

Abstract

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a widespread and complex health disorder. Dietary habits and consumption of simple sugars have been shown to play an important role in the prevention and treatment of MetS. This cross-sectional study was conducted in a population of 3380 adults from the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS) employees' health cohort. The healthy beverage index (HBI) and healthy beverage score (HBS) were calculated. Risk for MetS and its components, including blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, waist circumference, triglyceride levels, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, were measured using standardised protocols. Results showed a significant inverse association between higher adherence to HBI (OR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.48-0.74, < 0.001) and HBS (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.97, = 0.030) with lower risk of MetS. Also, we observed a significant association between higher level of HBI and HBS with decreased risk of hypertension, as a critical component of MetS. These findings support the notion that healthier beverage consumption, as indicated by higher HBI and HBS levels, may play a critical role in reducing the risk of MetS.

Keywords

ANP, Atrial natriuretic peptide ATP III, Adult Treatment Panel III BMI, Body Mass Index CVD, Cardiovascular Disease FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire HBI, Healthy Beverage Index HBS, Healthy Beverage Score HC, Hip Circumference HDL, High-Density Lipoprotein Healthy beverage index Healthy beverage score IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire MetS, Metabolic Syndrome Metabolic syndrome NCEP, National Cholesterol Education Program PCA, Principal Component Analysis SES, Socioeconomic Status SSB, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage SUMS, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences T2D, Type 2 Diabetes WC, Waist Circumference WI, Well-Being Index

References

  1. Adv Nutr. 2018 May 1;10(suppl_2):S144-S153 [PMID: 31089736]
  2. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Feb;29(1):7-25 [PMID: 25420774]
  3. Clin Nutr. 2021 Feb;40(2):542-549 [PMID: 32576389]
  4. Lancet. 2005 Sep 24-30;366(9491):1059-62 [PMID: 16182882]
  5. Nutrients. 2017 Nov 30;9(12): [PMID: 29189729]
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;84(2):274-88 [PMID: 16895873]
  7. Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 May 21;4(6):nzaa088 [PMID: 32551412]
  8. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Jun;51:102430 [PMID: 32507441]
  9. Dis Model Mech. 2009 May-Jun;2(5-6):231-7 [PMID: 19407331]
  10. Circulation. 2010 Jun 8;121(22):2398-406 [PMID: 20497980]
  11. Am J Epidemiol. 1985 Jul;122(1):51-65 [PMID: 4014201]
  12. Eur J Nutr. 2015 Oct;54(7):1129-37 [PMID: 25367317]
  13. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):554-562 [PMID: 27938940]
  14. Int J Endocrinol. 2021 Mar 29;2021:8862456 [PMID: 33859688]
  15. Nutrients. 2018 Jan 13;10(1): [PMID: 29342863]
  16. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020 Oct 19;2020:6381380 [PMID: 33133348]
  17. J Res Med Sci. 2021 Jul 31;26:50 [PMID: 34484382]
  18. Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Jun 20;11(8):4562-4571 [PMID: 37576062]
  19. Nutrients. 2019 Sep 01;11(9): [PMID: 31480603]
  20. J Med Life. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):587-599 [PMID: 33456611]
  21. BMC Nutr. 2023 Jun 28;9(1):76 [PMID: 37370157]
  22. Clin Nutr Res. 2023 Jul 26;12(3):218-228 [PMID: 37593211]
  23. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Mar 10;12(3): [PMID: 36978934]
  24. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 Jan - Feb;13(1):792-799 [PMID: 30641809]
  25. J Nutr. 2012 Jun;142(6):1081-7 [PMID: 22551801]
  26. Adv Nutr. 2021 Jun 1;12(3):708-721 [PMID: 33118010]
  27. J Health Popul Nutr. 2013 Sep;31(3):388-97 [PMID: 24288953]
  28. J Nutr. 2006 Nov;136(11):2901-7 [PMID: 17056820]
  29. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Sep;32(9):1373-9 [PMID: 18626486]
  30. Nutrients. 2023 Jan 13;15(2): [PMID: 36678301]
  31. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Aug;11(8):215-225 [PMID: 28639538]
  32. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 26;11:42 [PMID: 32174887]
  33. Korean Circ J. 2022 Feb;52(2):93-109 [PMID: 35128848]
  34. Nutr Rev. 2017 May 1;75(5):307-326 [PMID: 28521334]
  35. Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Dec 29;2022:7753259 [PMID: 36660267]
  36. Eur Heart J. 1987 May;8 Suppl B:99-109 [PMID: 3038556]
  37. Asian J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;2(2):106-16 [PMID: 22375226]
  38. Nutrients. 2015 May 13;7(5):3569-86 [PMID: 25984744]
  39. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Oct;115(10):1682-9.e2 [PMID: 26184445]
  40. Antioxidants (Basel). 2018 Feb 04;7(2): [PMID: 29401716]
  41. BMC Public Health. 2017 Jan 21;17(1):101 [PMID: 28109251]
  42. Clin Nutr. 2016 Dec;35(6):1269-1281 [PMID: 27060021]
  43. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Sep 27;14(1):143 [PMID: 36167582]
  44. J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Nov 21;37(45):e332 [PMID: 36413800]
  45. Nutr Rev. 2021 Dec 08;80(1):50-67 [PMID: 33855443]
  46. Nutrients. 2018 Oct 09;10(10): [PMID: 30304842]
  47. Sci Rep. 2014 Sep 01;4:6251 [PMID: 25176280]

MeSH Term

Humans
Metabolic Syndrome
Cross-Sectional Studies
Male
Female
Adult
Middle Aged
Blood Glucose
Blood Pressure
Triglycerides
Beverages
Waist Circumference
Risk Factors
Cholesterol, HDL
Hypertension
Diet, Healthy
Feeding Behavior
Iran

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Triglycerides
Cholesterol, HDL
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MetSbeverage0HBIHBShealthyHealthyMetabolicindexscorehigher=riskIndexBeveragesyndromehealthconsumptionplayrolecross-sectionalstudyShirazUniversityMedicalSciencesSUMSbloodlevelssignificantassociationOR95%CI:criticalIIIQuestionnaireCircumferencewidespreadcomplexdisorderDietaryhabitssimplesugarsshownimportantpreventiontreatmentconductedpopulation3380adultsemployees'cohortcalculatedRiskcomponentsincludingpressurefastingglucosewaistcircumferencetriglyceridehigh-densitylipoproteincholesterolmeasuredusingstandardisedprotocolsResultsshowedinverseadherence6048-074<0018065-097030lowerAlsoobservedleveldecreasedhypertensioncomponentfindingssupportnotionhealthierindicatedmayreducingAssociationmetabolicsyndrome:ANPAtrialnatriureticpeptideATPAdultTreatmentPanelBMIBodyMassCVDCardiovascularDiseaseFFQFoodFrequencyScoreHCHipHDLHigh-DensityLipoproteinIPAQInternationalPhysicalActivitySyndromeNCEPNationalCholesterolEducationProgramPCAPrincipalComponentAnalysisSESSocioeconomicStatusSSBSugar-SweetenedT2DType2DiabetesWCWaistWIWell-Being

Similar Articles

Cited By