Assessment of Unilateral Lower Limb Muscle Power: Are Unilateral Functional Tests Correlated with Nottingham Power Rig in Healthy Adults?

Andreas Bentzen, Stian Langg��rd J��rgensen, Louise Mortensen, Inger Mechlenburg, Frederik Foldager
Author Information
  1. Andreas Bentzen: Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
  2. Stian Langg��rd J��rgensen: Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
  3. Louise Mortensen: Department of Occupational and Physical Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
  4. Inger Mechlenburg: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
  5. Frederik Foldager: Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.

Abstract

Background: Muscle power is an important physical capability across all age groups and health statuses. Typically, assessing lower limb muscle power requires expensive and sophisticated equipment to ensure reliability and validity of power. Hence, there exists a clear need to identify a simple and effective functional performance test that can serve as a proxy for evaluating muscle power when equipment is unavailable. Thus, this study aimed to identify an easily administered, functional performance test to assess unilateral muscle power.
Methods: Correlations between maximal leg extensor power (LEP) were measured using the Nottingham Power Rig, and several functional tests (i) unilateral 5-repetition Sit-To-Stand (5STS), (ii) unilateral 30-second Sit-To-Stand (30STS), and (iii) unilateral Hop For Distance (HFD), as well as (iv) self-reported physical activity assessed by the Short Questionnaire to AsseS Health-enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated between LEP and the functional tests for both legs, as well as self-reported activity, among 52 healthy participants with a mean age of 31.1 years (ranging 19-49 years).
Results: A negligible correlation was found between LEP and SQUASH score. Negligible correlations were found between LEP and unilateral 5STS, unilateral 30STS, and HFD on the dominant leg. Positive low correlations were found between LEP and Unilateral 30STS (r=0.43, p=<0.01) and HFD (r=0.44, p=<0.01) on the non-dominant leg, as well as an inverse low correlation between LEP and unilateral 5STS (-0.42, p=0.01) on the non-dominant leg.
Conclusion: All correlations produced were negligible to low, suggesting that the functional tests investigated in this study may not be indicative of lower limb muscle power.
Level of evidence: 3b.

Keywords

References

  1. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008 Dec;18(6):773-82 [PMID: 18248533]
  2. Int J Clin Pract. 2020 Sep;74(9):e13556 [PMID: 32459876]
  3. Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71 [PMID: 23638278]
  4. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Aug;42(8):1566-81 [PMID: 20639724]
  5. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Dec;62:102678 [PMID: 36335851]
  6. Exp Gerontol. 2018 Oct 2;112:38-43 [PMID: 30179662]
  7. Exp Gerontol. 2021 Sep;152:111448 [PMID: 34118352]
  8. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4 [PMID: 24141714]
  9. Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 1;10(1):16337 [PMID: 33004970]
  10. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Dec;56(12):1163-9 [PMID: 14680666]
  11. J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Sep 1;36(9):2635-2642 [PMID: 33021580]
  12. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jun 18;75(7):1369-1378 [PMID: 31943003]
  13. Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Dec 20;3:798902 [PMID: 34988436]
  14. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Mar;50(3):461-7 [PMID: 11943041]
  15. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Aug;58(8):728-33 [PMID: 12902531]
  16. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 Aug;34(8):637-642 [PMID: 29297731]
  17. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Mar;84(3):206-12 [PMID: 11320637]
  18. Sports Med. 2011 Feb 1;41(2):125-46 [PMID: 21244105]
  19. Epidemiology. 2007 Nov;18(6):805-35 [PMID: 18049195]
  20. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007 Feb;17(1):43-53 [PMID: 16787447]
  21. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Dec;67(12):3166-73 [PMID: 26315282]
  22. Phys Ther Sport. 2022 May;55:46-54 [PMID: 35255306]
  23. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 May;25(5):1470-7 [PMID: 21116200]
  24. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2020 May;15(3):388-394 [PMID: 32566375]
  25. Clin J Sport Med. 2023 Jan 1;33(1):97-100 [PMID: 36599364]
  26. Hum Mov Sci. 2012 Aug;31(4):970-86 [PMID: 22397814]
  27. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Sep;42(9):1731-44 [PMID: 20142784]
  28. J Phys Ther Sci. 2021 Mar;33(3):250-260 [PMID: 33814713]
  29. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Sep;38(9):1601-7 [PMID: 16960521]
  30. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2018 Oct 08;16:8-13 [PMID: 30984557]
  31. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;60(5):385-90 [PMID: 2369911]
  32. Phys Ther Sport. 2021 Nov;52:280-286 [PMID: 34700261]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0powerunilateralLEPfunctionalmusclelegtestsUnilateralMusclephysicaltest5STS30STSHFDwellactivitycorrelationfoundcorrelationslow01agelowerlimbequipmentidentifyperformancestudyNottinghamPowerRigSit-To-Standself-reportedSQUASHyearsnegligibler=0p=<0non-dominantfunctionBackground:importantcapabilityacrossgroupshealthstatusesTypicallyassessingrequiresexpensivesophisticatedensurereliabilityvalidityHenceexistsclearneedsimpleeffectivecanserveproxyevaluatingunavailableThusaimedeasilyadministeredassessMethods:Correlationsmaximalextensormeasuredusingseveral5-repetitionii30-secondiiiHopDistanceivassessedShortQuestionnaireAsseSHealth-enhancingPearson'scoefficientscalculatedlegsamong52healthyparticipantsmean311ranging19-49Results:scoreNegligibledominantPositive4344inverse-042p=0Conclusion:producedsuggestinginvestigatedmayindicativeLevelevidence:3bAssessmentLowerLimbPower:FunctionalTestsCorrelatedHealthyAdults?ChairriseHorizontaljump

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.