The Biological Rationale for Integrating Intrinsic Capacity Into Frailty Models.

Zhuowei Yu, Madia Lozupone, Jie Chen, Zhijun Bao, Qingwei Ruan, Francesco Panza
Author Information
  1. Zhuowei Yu: Laboratory of Aging, Anti-Aging & Cognitive Performance, Shanghai Institute of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  2. Madia Lozupone: Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience "DiBraiN", University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
  3. Jie Chen: Shanghai Key Laboratory of Clinical Geriatrics, Shanghai Institute of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Huadong hospital affiliated to Shanghai Medical college, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  4. Zhijun Bao: Laboratory of Aging, Anti-Aging & Cognitive Performance, Shanghai Institute of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
  5. Qingwei Ruan: Laboratory of Aging, Anti-Aging & Cognitive Performance, Shanghai Institute of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  6. Francesco Panza: Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, Medical Clinic, and Geriatrics "Cesare Frugoni", University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy. ORCID

Abstract

The assessment and management of two function-centered clinical care models, frailty and intrinsic capacity decline have been proposed to achieve healthy aging. To implement these two care models, several different guidelines have been advocated by different health organizations, which has resulted in confusion and cost-ineffective results in healthcare practice. Although there are various operational definitions and screening tools of frailty, the most accepted operational definitions are based on the recognition of frailty phenotypes or deficit accumulation-based frailty indexes. Intrinsic capacity, referred to as the total physical and mental capacities for individual to undertake daily tasks in everyday life, is another care model, including five domains. Similar or identical instruments have been used to assess frailty and intrinsic capacity. In the present narrative review, we outlined the biological rationale for integrating intrinsic capacity into frailty models and highlighted the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains. The vitality domain or energy metabolism-related capacity, is the highest order dimension and the basis of other intrinsic capacity domains. Vitality vulnerability manifests as a pre-frailty status in function-centered healthy aging. We provided a conceptual framework of frailty phenotypes and frailty indexes based on the hierarchical and energy-dependent order of the intrinsic capacity domains, particularly vitality capacity. To facilitate the clinical translation of the framework, some potential energy metabolism-related biomarkers have also been proposed as critical components for assessing and screening vitality capacity in older age. The integrating framework not only provides testable theoretical hypotheses, particularly about vitality as a foundational element in aging, but could serve as a starting point for further research to unravel the mechanisms of frailty. It also improves cost-effectiveness for optimizing aging interventions in clinical healthcare and public health policies of healthy aging.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211558 [PMID: 33739429]
  2. Cell. 2010 Nov 24;143(5):802-12 [PMID: 21094524]
  3. Age Ageing. 2022 Nov 2;51(11): [PMID: 36346737]
  4. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1376-1386 [PMID: 31609229]
  5. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Oct 4;74(8):1308-1316 [PMID: 30521005]
  6. J Nutr Health Aging. 2013 Sep;17(9):726-34 [PMID: 24154642]
  7. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62 [PMID: 23395245]
  8. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jul 1;18(7):603-607 [PMID: 28411094]
  9. Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Jan;73:101530 [PMID: 34839041]
  10. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Nov;3(11):e789-e796 [PMID: 36356628]
  11. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Jun;3(6):e394-e404 [PMID: 36098317]
  12. J Orthop Res. 1988;6(2):215-22 [PMID: 3343627]
  13. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(12):2461-2470 [PMID: 32735331]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 1;112(48):E6614-23 [PMID: 26627253]
  15. Exp Gerontol. 2022 Oct 1;167:111926 [PMID: 35963450]
  16. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2018 Nov 10;73(12):1653-1660 [PMID: 29408961]
  17. JCI Insight. 2020 Oct 15;5(20): [PMID: 32941181]
  18. Ageing Res Rev. 2015 Mar;20:1-10 [PMID: 25555677]
  19. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 1;175(3):215-224 [PMID: 29202654]
  20. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jul 13;75(8):1594-1599 [PMID: 31562812]
  21. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jan;86(1 Suppl):S29-46 [PMID: 17370370]
  22. Alzheimers Dement. 2019 Aug;15(8):1019-1028 [PMID: 31278052]
  23. Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;45(4):973-988 [PMID: 27880685]
  24. Cell. 2023 Jan 19;186(2):243-278 [PMID: 36599349]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):20087-92 [PMID: 21041631]
  26. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021 Aug;2(8):e507-e520 [PMID: 36098000]
  27. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar 1;146(3):278-285 [PMID: 32027340]
  28. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Jan;20(1):58-63 [PMID: 30122323]
  29. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):96-104 [PMID: 33068107]
  30. J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(9):920-927 [PMID: 33155616]
  31. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Jan 7;77(1):94-100 [PMID: 34343305]
  32. Gerontology. 2024;70(2):165-172 [PMID: 37995668]
  33. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Jan;65(1):179-184 [PMID: 27861714]
  34. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Aug 9;80(6):598-609 [PMID: 35926933]
  35. Ann Intern Med. 2007 Aug 7;147(3):156-64 [PMID: 17679703]
  36. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2018 Apr;49:72-85 [PMID: 29339091]
  37. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Aug 01;72(8):1087-1090 [PMID: 28535277]
  38. Ageing Res Rev. 2021 Sep;70:101399 [PMID: 34214641]
  39. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e026119 [PMID: 31678933]
  40. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 Dec 29;77(12):2367-2372 [PMID: 36580380]
  41. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020 Sep;19(9):609-633 [PMID: 32709961]
  42. Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:359-407 [PMID: 16285865]
  43. Acta Biomed. 2019 May 23;90(2):364-374 [PMID: 31125023]
  44. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2018 Nov 09;10:2040622318811000 [PMID: 31452865]
  45. Exp Gerontol. 2019 May;119:61-73 [PMID: 30690066]
  46. Science. 2011 Jan 28;331(6016):456-61 [PMID: 21205641]
  47. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(s1):S85-S93 [PMID: 31450502]
  48. ScientificWorldJournal. 2001 Aug 08;1:323-36 [PMID: 12806071]
  49. Science. 2016 Jan 15;351(6270):275-281 [PMID: 26816379]
  50. Age Ageing. 2019 Nov 1;48(6):922-926 [PMID: 31566668]
  51. BMC Geriatr. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):186 [PMID: 31277579]
  52. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Aug;63(8):986-92 [PMID: 19190667]
  53. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1365-1375 [PMID: 31609228]
  54. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015 Feb;93(2):177-186 [PMID: 25471480]
  55. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019 Apr;10(2):278-286 [PMID: 30843369]
  56. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):780-786.e2 [PMID: 32768376]
  57. Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Jan;10(1):518-529 [PMID: 33545783]
  58. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;30(3):332-337 [PMID: 34412934]
  59. Front Neurosci. 2022 Dec 21;16:1046095 [PMID: 36620444]
  60. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Nov 30;7:576079 [PMID: 33330532]
  61. Maturitas. 2020 Nov;141:39-45 [PMID: 33036701]
  62. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Apr 23;74(5):659-666 [PMID: 29726918]
  63. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Jul - Aug;83:126-130 [PMID: 31003135]
  64. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Jun;71(6):787-96 [PMID: 26463762]
  65. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Feb;18(2):177-184 [PMID: 30663607]
  66. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan;92(1):28-35 [PMID: 22854908]
  67. J Intern Med. 2021 Nov;290(5):1071-1082 [PMID: 34437740]
  68. Proc Nutr Soc. 2014 May;73(2):237-48 [PMID: 24456831]
  69. Aging Cell. 2021 Sep;20(9):e13459 [PMID: 34431594]
  70. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Jul;63(7):698-706 [PMID: 18693224]
  71. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Apr 23;74(5):667-674 [PMID: 30084927]
  72. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001 Mar;56(3):M146-56 [PMID: 11253156]
  73. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 27;166(4):418-23 [PMID: 16505261]
  74. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Sep;63(9):984-90 [PMID: 18840805]
  75. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 15;12(6):e0178383 [PMID: 28617837]
  76. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012 Jul;13(6):546-51 [PMID: 22579590]
  77. N Engl J Med. 2024 Aug 8;391(6):538-548 [PMID: 39115063]
  78. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Oct;58 Suppl 2:S329-36 [PMID: 21029063]
  79. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Oct;11(5):1223-1231 [PMID: 32558267]
  80. Lancet Public Health. 2018 Jul;3(7):e323-e332 [PMID: 29908859]
  81. J Aging Health. 2020 Aug-Sep;32(7-8):654-659 [PMID: 30983468]
  82. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Jun;11(5):344-55 [PMID: 20511102]
  83. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Apr;15(4):281-6 [PMID: 24534517]
  84. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2019 Jul/Sep;42(3):E135-E141 [PMID: 28786908]
  85. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022 Apr;18(4):243-258 [PMID: 35145250]
  86. Maturitas. 2016 Nov;93:73-77 [PMID: 27240713]
  87. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Oct;60(10):1811-6 [PMID: 23035640]

MeSH Term

Humans
Frailty
Geriatric Assessment
Aged
Frail Elderly
Activities of Daily Living
Energy Metabolism
Biomarkers
Phenotype
Healthy Aging
Aging

Chemicals

Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0frailtycapacityintrinsicagingvitalitydomainsclinicalcaremodelshealthyorderframeworktwofunction-centeredproposeddifferenthealthhealthcareoperationaldefinitionsscreeningbasedphenotypesindexesIntrinsicintegratinghierarchicalenergy-dependentenergymetabolism-relatedparticularlybiomarkersalsoassessmentmanagementdeclineachieveimplementseveralguidelinesadvocatedorganizationsresultedconfusioncost-ineffectiveresultspracticeAlthoughvarioustoolsacceptedrecognitiondeficitaccumulation-basedreferredtotalphysicalmentalcapacitiesindividualundertakedailytaskseverydaylifeanothermodelincludingfiveSimilaridenticalinstrumentsusedassesspresentnarrativereviewoutlinedbiologicalrationalehighlighteddomainhighestdimensionbasisVitalityvulnerabilitymanifestspre-frailtystatusprovidedconceptualfacilitatetranslationpotentialcriticalcomponentsassessingolderageprovidestestabletheoreticalhypothesesfoundationalelementservestartingpointresearchunravelmechanismsimprovescost-effectivenessoptimizinginterventionspublicpoliciesBiologicalRationaleIntegratingCapacityFrailtyModelsindexphenotype

Similar Articles

Cited By