Sex-based Differences in the Utility and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Mirvat Alasnag, Waleed AlHabeeb, Feras Khaliel
Author Information
  1. Mirvat Alasnag: Cardiac Center, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  2. Waleed AlHabeeb: Department of Cardiac Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  3. Feras Khaliel: Heart Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

The totality of evidence suggests that there remains a significant disparity in the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and heart transplantation (HT) in women. This disparity persists even after accounting for differences in baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk factors between men and women undergoing LVAD implantation as a bridge to HT. Generally, women are less likely to undergo HT, leading to a higher mortality rate in women on the HT waiting list. The differences in risk profiles and device-related complications may account for the sexrelated disparities in the assignment of device therapies. These findings warrant an urgent need to conduct prospective studies to better define this conundrum and establish guidelines to narrow the current gaps in care.

Keywords

References

  1. Circulation. 1995 Jun 1;91(11):2753-61 [PMID: 7758181]
  2. Transplantation. 2018 Jul;102(7):1023-1026 [PMID: 29952920]
  3. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022 May;36(5):1502-1504 [PMID: 35165039]
  4. ASAIO J. 2018 Jul/Aug;64(4):440-449 [PMID: 29084066]
  5. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;23(8):1392-1400 [PMID: 33932272]
  6. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2018 Jan;37(1):61-70 [PMID: 28754423]
  7. J Cardiol. 2021 Mar;77(3):209-216 [PMID: 32868140]
  8. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Dec;11(12):1692-1704 [PMID: 37831046]
  9. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Mar;111(3):778-792 [PMID: 33465365]
  10. Clin Transplant. 2020 May;34(5):e13839 [PMID: 32073188]
  11. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Mar;7(3):250-257 [PMID: 30819381]
  12. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Mar;109(3):780-786 [PMID: 31479642]
  13. J Card Fail. 2020 Apr;26(4):316-323 [PMID: 31809791]
  14. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 May 9;81(18):1835-1878 [PMID: 37137593]
  15. J Card Fail. 2022 Mar;28(3):477-498 [PMID: 34774749]
  16. Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Dec;44(12):990-997 [PMID: 33784845]
  17. J Card Fail. 2022 Mar;28(3):453-466 [PMID: 35085762]
  18. ASAIO J. 2022 Jan 1;68(1):21-27 [PMID: 34156789]
  19. Circ Heart Fail. 2019 Sep;12(9):e006082 [PMID: 31514517]
  20. Circulation. 2021 Oct 12;144(15):e238-e250 [PMID: 34503343]
  21. Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):234-40 [PMID: 22260946]
  22. ASAIO J. 2018 Nov/Dec;64(6):748-753 [PMID: 29210772]
  23. Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jan 15;119(2):297-301 [PMID: 27839770]
  24. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017 Oct;36(10):1080-1086 [PMID: 28942782]
  25. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Jun;35(6):777-88 [PMID: 27068037]
  26. Circulation. 2007 Mar 27;115(12):1563-70 [PMID: 17353436]
  27. Am Heart J. 2008 Feb;155(2):339-47 [PMID: 18215606]
  28. J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2020 Jun 04;32(2):236-241 [PMID: 33154923]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HTwomendifferencesdisparityventricularassistdevicesriskOutcomesLefttotalityevidencesuggestsremainssignificantuseleftLVADshearttransplantationpersistsevenaccountingbaselinecharacteristicscomorbiditiescardiovascularfactorsmenundergoingLVADimplantationbridgeGenerallylesslikelyundergoleadinghighermortalityratewaitinglistprofilesdevice-relatedcomplicationsmayaccountsexrelateddisparitiesassignmentdevicetherapiesfindingswarranturgentneedconductprospectivestudiesbetterdefineconundrumestablishguidelinesnarrowcurrentgapscareSex-basedDifferencesUtilityVentricularAssistDevicesHeartfailureSexWomen

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.