Evaluation of perioperative lung ultrasound scores in robotic radical prostatectomy: prospective observational study.

İrem Vuran Yaz, Emre Sertaç Bingül, Mert Canbaz, Evren Aygün, Mehmet Öner Şanlı, Faruk Özcan, Meltem Savran Karadeniz
Author Information
  1. İrem Vuran Yaz: Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Millet Cd. Cerrahi Monoblok Giriş Kat, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
  2. Emre Sertaç Bingül: Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Millet Cd. Cerrahi Monoblok Giriş Kat, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey. emre.bingul@istanbul.edu.tr.
  3. Mert Canbaz: Department of Anesthesiology, Eyupsultan State Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  4. Evren Aygün: Department of Anesthesiology, Liv Vadistanbul Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
  5. Mehmet Öner Şanlı: Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  6. Faruk Özcan: Department of Urology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  7. Meltem Savran Karadeniz: Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Millet Cd. Cerrahi Monoblok Giriş Kat, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.

Abstract

Robotic major abdominal surgeries are popular worldwide, yet very few clinical studies have investigated the effects of robotic surgery setup on respiratory outcomes. In this prospective observational study, it is aimed to demonstrate the change in ultrasonographic condition of the lungs throughout the robotic surgery and its relation with respiratory outcomes. Robotic radical prostatectomy patients without any preexisting lung or cardiac pathology were enrolled in the study. Lung ultrasound score (LUS) was chosen to evaluate lungs perioperatively in three different time points that is as follows: 5 min after intubation (T1), before extubation (T2), and 30 min after extubation (T3). Blood gas analyses were made at the same time points. Primary outcome was the change of LUS comparing T3 versus T1. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative change of LUS, severe postoperative pulmonary complication incidence, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission incidence, comparison of oxygenation via PaO and PaO/FiO, and sensitivity/specificity of LUS for determining ICU admission. Total 48 patients were analyzed. T3 LUS was significantly higher than T1 LUS, and T2 was the highest amongst (15.5 [6, 25] vs 8.5 [4, 20] vs 20.5 [13, 30], respectively, p < 0.01). Pre-extubation LUS were significantly higher in patients who were admitted to ICU comparing who were not (23.5 [17, 30] vs 20 [13, 27], p = 0.03). PaO/FiO ratio did not change among the groups significantly (p = 0.14). ROC curve of T2LUS showed 67% sensitivity and 85% specificity with a cut-off value of 22.5 for ICU admission (AUC 0.73 [0.516, 0.937], p = 0.04). LUS significantly worsened in robotic prostatectomy throughout the surgery, yet clinical deoxygenation or severe PPC were not observed. On the other hand, pre-extubation LUS may be used to determine possible ICU admission for the patients.Clinical trial registry: This study was prospectively registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05528159).

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT05528159

References

  1. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021 Jun;87(6):655-662 [PMID: 33325216]
  2. Anesthesiology. 2019 Sep;131(3):716-749 [PMID: 30664057]
  3. JSLS. 2022 Apr-Jun;26(2): [PMID: 35655469]
  4. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Dec 27;36(50):e334 [PMID: 34962110]
  5. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Mar 1;38(3):275-284 [PMID: 33399385]
  6. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105 [PMID: 25058504]
  7. Crit Ultrasound J. 2015 Dec;7(1):19 [PMID: 26660526]
  8. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jan;124(1):101-109 [PMID: 31733807]
  9. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):361-378 [PMID: 32169184]
  10. World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1467-77 [PMID: 11760751]
  11. Anesthesiology. 2021 Jun 1;134(6):949-965 [PMID: 33819339]
  12. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;100(2):461-468 [PMID: 32169190]
  13. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):19 [PMID: 33446103]
  14. Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):494-504 [PMID: 27669555]
  15. J Physiother. 2021 Jan;67(1):41-48 [PMID: 33353830]
  16. J Clin Med. 2021 Feb 19;10(4): [PMID: 33669526]

MeSH Term

Humans
Prostatectomy
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Prospective Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Ultrasonography
Lung
Postoperative Complications
Aged
Perioperative Period

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0LUSICU5roboticsurgerystudychangepatientsadmissionsignificantlyRoboticoutcomesultrasoundT1T3vsp = 0yetclinicalrespiratoryprospectiveobservationallungsthroughoutradicalprostatectomylungLungtimepointsextubationT2comparingsevereincidencePaO/FiOhigher20[1330]0complicationsmajorabdominalsurgeriespopularworldwidestudiesinvestigatedeffectssetupaimeddemonstrateultrasonographicconditionrelationwithoutpreexistingcardiacpathologyenrolledscorechosenevaluateperioperativelythreedifferentfollows:5 minintubation30 minBloodgasanalysesmadePrimaryoutcomeversusSecondaryincludedintraoperativepostoperativepulmonarycomplicationunplannedintensivecareunitcomparisonoxygenationviaPaOsensitivity/specificitydeterminingTotal48analyzedhighestamongst15[625]8[420]respectivelyp < 001Pre-extubationadmitted23[1727]03ratioamonggroups14ROCcurveT2LUSshowed67%sensitivity85%specificitycut-offvalue22AUC73[0516937]04worseneddeoxygenationPPCobservedhandpre-extubationmayuseddeterminepossibleClinicaltrialregistry:prospectivelyregisteredClinicaltrialsgovNCT05528159Evaluationperioperativescoresprostatectomy:AtelectasisPerioperativeRespiratory

Similar Articles

Cited By