AI-enhanced PET/CT image synthesis using CycleGAN for improved ovarian cancer imaging.

Amir Hossein Farshchitabrizi, Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi, Sedigheh Sina, Mehrosadat Alavi, Zahra Nasiri Feshani, Hamid Omidi
Author Information
  1. Amir Hossein Farshchitabrizi: Namazi Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  2. Mohammad Hossein Sadeghi: Nuclear Engineering Department, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  3. Sedigheh Sina: Radiation Research Centre, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
  4. Mehrosadat Alavi: Ionising and Non-Ionising Radiation protection Research Centre, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  5. Zahra Nasiri Feshani: PET/CT Centre, Nuclear Medicine Department, Kowsar Hospital, Shiraz, Iran.
  6. Hamid Omidi: Nuclear Engineering Department, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.

Abstract

Purpose: Ovarian cancer is the fifth fatal cancer among women. Positron emission tomography (PET), which offers detailed metabolic data, can be effectively used for early cancer screening. However, proper attenuation correction is essential for interpreting the data obtained by this imaging modality. Computed tomography (CT) imaging is commonly performed alongside PET imaging for attenuation correction. This approach may introduce some issues in spatial alignment and registration of the images obtained by the two modalities. This study aims to perform PET image attenuation correction by using generative adversarial networks (GANs), without additional CT imaging.
Material and methods: The PET/CT data from 55 ovarian cancer patients were used in this study. Three GAN architectures: Conditional GAN, Wasserstein GAN, and CycleGAN, were evaluated for attenuation correction. The statistical performance of each model was assessed by calculating the mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The radiological performance assessments of the models were performed by comparing the standardised uptake value and the Hounsfield unit values of the whole body and selected organs, in the synthetic and real PET and CT images.
Results: Based on the results, CycleGAN demonstrated effective attenuation correction and pseudo-CT generation, with high accuracy. The MAE and MSE for all images were 2.15 �� 0.34 and 3.14 �� 0.56, respectively. For CT reconstruction, such values were found to be 4.17 �� 0.96 and 5.66 �� 1.01, respectively.
Conclusions: The results showed the potential of deep learning in reducing radiation exposure and improving the quality of PET imaging. Further refinement and clinical validation are needed for full clinical applicability.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Med. 2023 May 15;21(1):182 [PMID: 37189125]
  2. Pol J Radiol. 2024 Jan 22;89:e30-e48 [PMID: 38371888]
  3. PET Clin. 2014 Oct;9(4):355-70, v [PMID: 26050942]
  4. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2020;76(11):1152-1162 [PMID: 33229845]
  5. Phys Med Biol. 2020 Nov 03;65(21):215010 [PMID: 32663812]
  6. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Aug 1;13(8):5218-5229 [PMID: 37581064]
  7. EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep 17;53:101662 [PMID: 36147628]
  8. Phys Med Biol. 2015 Sep 7;60(17):6775-87 [PMID: 26296141]
  9. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):1079-1091 [PMID: 28180966]
  10. Radiographics. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):569-83 [PMID: 21415197]
  11. NPJ Precis Oncol. 2023 Aug 31;7(1):83 [PMID: 37653025]
  12. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Dec;197:105764 [PMID: 33010702]
  13. Acta Oncol. 2024 Jun 23;63:503-510 [PMID: 38912830]
  14. Acad Radiol. 2018 Nov;25(11):1472-1480 [PMID: 29606338]
  15. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Jun;70(3):382-92 [PMID: 19406595]
  16. Ann Nucl Med. 2022 Feb;36(2):133-143 [PMID: 35029818]
  17. Radiol Technol. 2020 Jul;91(6):561-575 [PMID: 32606233]
  18. EJNMMI Phys. 2018 Nov 12;5(1):24 [PMID: 30417316]
  19. Br J Radiol. 2021 Sep 1;94(1125):20210117 [PMID: 34415198]
  20. Radiology. 2020 Oct;297(1):6-14 [PMID: 32840473]
  21. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2024 Dec;47(4):1739-1749 [PMID: 39312120]
  22. Acad Radiol. 2020 Aug;27(8):1175-1185 [PMID: 32035758]
  23. Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(9):823 [PMID: 34268436]
  24. Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Dec 02;3(2):e200137 [PMID: 33937860]
  25. Ann Nucl Med. 2023 Dec;37(12):645-654 [PMID: 37768493]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0cancerPETimagingattenuationcorrectionCTCycleGAN��dataimagesovarianGAN0tomographyusedobtainedperformedstudyimageusingPET/CTperformancemeanerrorMSEMAEvaluesresultsrespectivelyclinicalPurpose:OvarianfifthfatalamongwomenPositronemissionoffersdetailedmetaboliccaneffectivelyearlyscreeningHoweverproperessentialinterpretingmodalityComputedcommonlyalongsideapproachmayintroduceissuesspatialalignmentregistrationtwomodalitiesaimsperformgenerativeadversarialnetworksGANswithoutadditionalMaterialmethods:55patientsThreearchitectures:ConditionalWassersteinevaluatedstatisticalmodelassessedcalculatingsquaredabsoluteradiologicalassessmentsmodelscomparingstandardiseduptakevalueHounsfieldunitwholebodyselectedorganssyntheticrealResults:Baseddemonstratedeffectivepseudo-CTgenerationhighaccuracy2153431456reconstructionfound41796566101Conclusions:showedpotentialdeeplearningreducingradiationexposureimprovingqualityrefinementvalidationneededfullapplicabilityAI-enhancedsynthesisimprovedscanattenuation-correction

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.