OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
Australian veterinary journal
Mar 12, 2025;

Prognostic factors in bushfire-affected koalas-Kangaroo Island bushfire response 2020.

O Funnell, J McLelland, A Kokosinska, T Stephenson, E Dunstan, B Turner, N Speight
Author Information
  1. O Funnell: Zoos SA, Adelaide, Australia.
  2. J McLelland: Zoos SA, Adelaide, Australia.
  3. A Kokosinska: Zoos SA, Adelaide, Australia.
  4. T Stephenson: School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia.
  5. E Dunstan: School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia.
  6. B Turner: School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia.
  7. N Speight: School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, Australia. ORCID
PMID: 40077927 DOI: 10.1111/avj.13434

Abstract

This study presents a retrospective analysis of clinical records data from koalas presenting for treatment following the large-scale bushfire event on Kangaroo Island 2019-2020. The aim of the study was to identify prognostic factors for koalas affected by bushfire. Koalas (n���=���199) were grouped based on their burn status in combination with their burn bandaging requirement at triage; those with no burns, with burns that did not require bandaging and with burns that did require bandaging. Overall, 59.8% of koalas had positive outcomes, but this reduced to only 13% of koalas in the most severely affected group (burns that were bandaged). Negative outcomes were found to be associated with several factors, including the timing of presentation, with the worst affected animals presenting in the first 2���weeks of the operation. Also, an increasing number of bandage changes during hospitalisation led to increasingly negative outcomes, with no positive outcomes beyond three bandage changes. In addition, clear associations were found with patterns of burns on feet, with only 4% positive outcomes for animals with all 4���feet burnt. All bandaged koalas with severe dehydration had negative outcomes and body weights decreased over time for hospitalised animals from the most severely affected bandaged burn group. Mild serum sodium concentration elevation at triage was the only clinically significant blood abnormality for koalas with bandaged burns. Overall, this study identified key prognostic factors, particularly bandaging requirements and the number of feet burnt, that will enable more effective decision-making at triage and improve animal welfare outcomes.

Keywords

burns bushfire koala prognostic factor triage wildlife

References

  1. Parrott ML, Wicker LV, Lamont A et al. Emergency response to Australia's Black summer 2019���2020: the role of a zoo���based conservation organisation in wildlife triage, rescue, and resilience for the future. Animals 2021;11:1515.
  2. Dunstan E, Funnell O, McLelland J et al. An analysis of demographic and triage assessment findings in bushfire���affected koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, 2019���2020. Animals 2021;11:3237.
  3. Cope HR, McArthur C, Gray R et al. Trends in rescue and rehabilitation of marsupials surviving the Australian 2019���2020 bushfires. Animals 2024;14:1019.
  4. DEW. Department for Environment and Water, The Government of South Australia. Kangaroo Island Bushfires, 2019���2020. www.arcgis.com/apps/Cascade/index.html?appid=ef29c850d8e34e98a8307dbdfe0aaaab. Retrieved September 12 2020.
  5. Bushfires at the Flinders Chase National Park. https://cdn.environment.sa.gov.au/parks/docs/bushfires���at���flinders���chase���national���park.pdf?v=1610572484. 2020. Retrieved November 20 2022.
  6. Molsher R. Kangaroo Island koala population survey 2015. 2017. Natural Resources Kangaroo Island SA, Government of South Australia.
  7. Robertson���Steel I. Evolution of triage systems. Emerg Med J 2006;23:154���155.
  8. Molony SE, Baker PJ, Garland L et al. Factors that can be used to predict release rates for wildlife casualties. Anim Welf 2007;16:361���367.
  9. Cope HR, McArthur C, Dickman CR et al. A systematic review of factors affecting wildlife survival during rehabilitation and release. PLoS One 2022;17:e0265514.
  10. Clark GM, Zborowski DM, Culbertson JL et al. Clinical utility of epidermal growth factor receptor expression for selecting patients with advanced non���small cell lung cancer for treatment with erlotinib. J Thorac Oncol 2006;1:837���846.
  11. Blanshard W, Bodley K. Koalas. In: Vogelnest L, Woods R, editors. Medicine of Australian mammals. CSIRO, Collingwood, Australia, 2008;272���302.
  12. Martin R, Handasyde K. The koala: natural history, conservation and management. In: Dawson TJ, editor. Australian natural history series. 2nd edn. University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, 1999;70���89.
  13. Pavletic MM, Trout NJ. Bullet, bite, and burn wounds in dogs and cats. Vet Clin Small Anim 2006;36:873���893.
  14. Hulse LS, Hickey D, Mitchell JM et al. Development and application of two multiplex real���time PCR assays for detection and speciation of bacterial pathogens in the koala. J Vet Diagn Invest 2018;30:523���529.
  15. Tarlinton R, Meers J, Hanger J et al. Real���time reverse transcriptase PCR for the endogenous koala retrovirus reveals and association between plasma viral load and neoplastic disease in koalas. J Gen Virol 2005;86:783���787.
  16. Stephenson T, Speight N, Low WY et al. Molecular diagnosis of koala retrovirus (KoRV) in south Australian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Animals 2021;11:1477.
  17. Kasimov V, Stephenson T, Speight N et al. Identification and prevalence of Phascolarctid Gammaherpesvirus types 1 and 2 in south Australian koala populations. Viruses 2020;12:948.
  18. Shojima T, Yoshikawa R, Hoshino S et al. Identification of a novel subgroup of koala retrovirus from koalas in Japanese zoos. J Virol 2013;87:9943���9948.
  19. Fabijan J, Speight KN, Boardman WSJ et al. Haematological reference intervals of wild southern Australian koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). Aust Vet J 2020;98:207���215.
  20. Canfield PM, O'Neill ME, Smith EF. Haematological and biochemical reference values for the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus). Aust Vet J 1989;66:324���326.
  21. Gillett A, Hanger J. Koala. In: Vogelnest L, Portas T, editors. Current therapy in medicine of Australian mammals. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton, Victoria, 2019;463���486.
  22. Speight KN, Boardman W, Breed WG et al. Pathological features of oxalate nephrosis in a population of koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) in South Australia. Vet Pathol 2013;50:299���307.
  23. Baek C, Woolford L, Funnell O et al. Cutaneous and respiratory lesions in bushfire���affected koalas. Vet Sci 2023;10:658.
  24. Gaschk JL, Fr��re CH, Clemente CJ. Quantifying koala locomotion strategies: implications for the evolution of arborealism in marsupials. J Exp Biol 2019;222:jeb207506.
  25. Vaughn L, Beckel N. Severe burn injury, burn shock, and smoke inhalation injury in small animals. Part 1: burn classification and pathophysiology: severe burn injury and smoke inhalation injury. J Vet Emerg Crit Care 2012;22:179���186.
  26. DELWP. Guidelines and decision framework for euthanasia of wildlife. Department of Land Water and Planning, Victoria, Australia, 2014 https://www.wildlife.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/447111/Guidelines���and���decision���framework���for���euthansia���of���wildlife.pdf: Retrieved 20th October 2024.
  27. Hajduk P, Copland MD, Schultz DA. Effects of capture on haematological values and plasma cortisol levels of free���range koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus). J Wildl Dis 1992;28:502���506.
  28. Barajas���Nava LA, L��pez���Alcalde J, Roqu�� i Figuls M et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for preventing burn wound infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;6:CD008738���CD008738.
  29. Ramos GE. Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis in burn patients: a systematic review. J Hosp Infect 2017;97:105���114.
  30. McDougall FK, Boardman WSJ, Speight N et al. Carriage of antibiotic resistance genes to treatments for chlamydial disease in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus): a comparison of occurrence before and during catastrophic wildfires. One Health 2023;17:100652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2023.100652.
  31. McDougall FK, Speight N, Funnell O et al. Dynamics of antimicrobial resistance carriage in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) and Pteropid bats (Pteropus poliocephalus) before, during and after wildfires. Microb Ecol 2024;87(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-024-02351-w.
  32. Kimble B, Black LA, Li KM et al. Pharmacokinetics of meloxicam in koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) after intravenous, subcutaneous and oral administration. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 2013;36:486���493.

Grants

  1. D21ZO-506/Morris Animal Foundation
  2. /Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Australian Government
  3. /Prague Zoo
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0burnsoutcomeskoalasbushfirefactorsaffectedbandagingtriagebandagedstudyprognosticburnpositiveanimalspresentingIslandrequireOverallseverelygroupfoundnumberbandagechangesnegativefeetburntpresentsretrospectiveanalysisclinicalrecordsdatatreatmentfollowinglarge-scaleeventKangaroo2019-2020aimidentifyKoalasn���=���199groupedbasedstatuscombinationrequirement598%reduced13%Negativeassociatedseveralincludingtimingpresentationworstfirst2���weeksoperationAlsoincreasinghospitalisationledincreasinglybeyondthreeadditionclearassociationspatterns4%4���feetseveredehydrationbodyweightsdecreasedtimehospitalisedMildserumsodiumconcentrationelevationclinicallysignificantbloodabnormalityidentifiedkeyparticularlyrequirementswillenableeffectivedecision-makingimproveanimalwelfarePrognosticbushfire-affectedkoalas-Kangarooresponse2020koalafactorwildlife

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.