Vaginal Erbium Laser Versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Ann-Sophie Page, Eline Borowski, Emma Bauters, Susanne Housmans, Frank Van der Aa, Jan Deprest
Author Information
  1. Ann-Sophie Page: Department Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, and Academic Department Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery UZ Leuven, KU Louvain, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. ann-sophie.page@uzleuven.be. ORCID
  2. Eline Borowski: Department Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, and Academic Department Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery UZ Leuven, KU Louvain, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
  3. Emma Bauters: Department Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, and Academic Department Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery UZ Leuven, KU Louvain, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
  4. Susanne Housmans: Department Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, and Academic Department Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery UZ Leuven, KU Louvain, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.
  5. Frank Van der Aa: Department Urology, Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, and Academic Department Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
  6. Jan Deprest: Department Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, and Academic Department Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery UZ Leuven, KU Louvain, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Current studies on vaginal laser therapy for the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) are inconclusive, and many lack comparison with another conservative treatment. Therefore, we compared the efficacy of Er:YAG laser for SUI with that of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT).
METHODS: Single-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing laser treatment (3-6 applications) with PFMT (9-18 sessions) in women with mild to moderate SUI. Main outcome measures included subjective change in urinary incontinence symptoms by change from baseline to 4 months after randomisation by Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6; primary), adverse events, and other subjective and objective outcomes up to 24 months. A priori sample size calculation for a non-inferiority study resulted in 28 patients per arm. Because of a higher than expected dropout early in the study, we increased our sample size from 56 to 60, without unblinding of the data.
RESULTS: Sixty women were enrolled. Two participants discontinued their allocated treatment (one in each group). At 4 months, mean difference in change in UDI-6 scores was -6.99 (95% CI���=���-22.34; 8.37), demonstrating non-inferiority of laser to PFMT (p���=���0.023). Within groups, most patients improved, yet subjective cure was reached in only a minority (laser: 11% [3 out of 28]; PFMT: 8% [2 out of 26]). The mean number of treatment visits was 4.25 (SD 1.17) in the laser group and 10.04 (SD 6.36) in the PFMT group. There were no subjective or objective inter-group differences. At 24 months, the majority of patients requested additional, yet alternative treatment. There were no serious adverse events at any time point.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment effect of vaginal laser and PFMT in patients with mild and moderate SUI were comparable, limited and short lasting. No adverse events were reported.

Keywords

References

  1. Milsom I, Gyhagen M. The prevalence of urinary incontinence. Climacteric. 2019;22(3):217���22. [DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1543263]
  2. Richter HE, Burgio KL, Brubaker L, Nygaard IE, Ye W, Weidner A, et al. Continence pessary compared with behavioral therapy or combined therapy for stress incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):609���17. [DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d055d4]
  3. Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10:CD005654. [PMID: 30288727]
  4. B�� K, Hilde G. Does it work in the long term?���A systematic review on pelvic floor muscle training for female stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2013;32(3):215���23. [DOI: 10.1002/nau.22292]
  5. Ogah J, Cody JD, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD006375.
  6. Schellart RP, Casteleijn FM, Dijkgraaf MGW, Tutolo M, Roovers JWR. Are patients willing to trade cure rate against less pain? Patients��� preferences for single incision midurethral sling or transobturator standard midurethral sling. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36(4):1187���93. [DOI: 10.1002/nau.23093]
  7. FDA. FDA warns against use of energy-based devices to perform vaginal rejuvenation or vaginal cosmetic procedures: FDA safety communication. Date Issued: 30 July 2018. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/safety-communications/fda-warns-against-useenergy-based-devices-perform-vaginal-rejuvenation-or-vaginalcosmetic .
  8. Bhide AA, Khullar V, Swift S, Digesu GA. The use of laser in urogynaecology. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30(5):683���92. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-018-3844-7]
  9. Giarenis I, Tsiapakidou S, Zacche M, Mukhopadhyay S, Mahmood T. European Board and College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (EBCOG) position statement on the use of laser vaginal devices for treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vaginal laxity, pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;299:342���4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.021]
  10. Da Fonseca LC, Giarreta FBA, Peterson TV, Locali PKM, Baracat EC, Ferreira EAG, et al. A randomized trial comparing vaginal laser therapy and pelvic floor physical therapy for treating women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023;42(7):1445���54. [DOI: 10.1002/nau.25244]
  11. Blaganje M, ����epanovi�� D, ��gur L, Verdenik I, Pajk F, Lukanovi�� A. Non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy effect on stress urinary incontinence related to quality of life and sexual function: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;224:153���8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.03.038]
  12. Seki AS, Bianchi-Ferraro A, Fonseca ESM, Sartori MGF, Gir��o M, Jarmy-Di Bella ZIK. CO laser and radiofrequency compared to a sham control group in treatment of stress urinary incontinence (LARF study arm 3). A randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(12):3535���42. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05091-y]
  13. Lauterbach R, Aharoni S, Justman N, Farago N, Gruenwald I, Lowenstein L. The efficacy and safety of a single maintenance laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(12):3499���504. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05103-x]
  14. Alexander JW, Karjalainen P, Ow LL, Kulkarni M, Lee JK, Karjalainen T, et al. CO surgical laser for treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227(3):473.e1���12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.054]
  15. O���Reilly BA, Viereck V, Phillips C, Toozs-Hobson P, Kuhn A, Athanasiou S, et al. Vaginal erbium laser treatment for stress urinary incontinence: a multicenter randomized sham-controlled clinical trial. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024;164(3):1184���94. [DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.15222]
  16. Temtanakitpaisan T, Chongsomchai C, Buppasiri P. Fractional CO laser treatment for women with stress predominant urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2023;34(11):2827���32. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-023-05655-6]
  17. Valderrama V, Collins SA, Swift S, Jha S, Rosamilia A, de Tayrac R, et al. Joint report on the terminology for surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):465���78. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04237-0]
  18. Sandvik H, Espuna M, Hunskaar S. Validity of the incontinence severity index: comparison with pad-weighing tests. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(5):520���4. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-0060-z]
  19. Pardo JI, Sol�� VR, Morales AA. Treatment of female stress urinary incontinence with Erbium-YAG laser in non-ablative mode. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;204:1���4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.031]
  20. Fistoni�� N, Fistoni�� I, Gu��tek ��F, Turina IS, Marton I, Vi��intin Z, et al. Minimally invasive, non-ablative Er:YAG laser treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women���a pilot study. Lasers Med Sci. 2016;31(4):635���43. [DOI: 10.1007/s10103-016-1884-0]
  21. Ogrinc U, Sencar S. Non-ablative vaginal erbium YAG laser for the treatment of cystocele. Ital J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;29(1):19���25.
  22. Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the incontinence impact questionnaire and the urogenital distress inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) research group. Qual Life Res. 1994;3(5):291���306. [DOI: 10.1007/BF00451721]
  23. Barber MD, Chen Z, Lukacz E, Markland A, Wai C, Brubaker L, et al. Further validation of the short form versions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(4):541���6. [DOI: 10.1002/nau.20934]
  24. Barber MD, Spino C, Janz NK, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Nager CW, et al. The minimum important differences for the urinary scales of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(5):580.e1���7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.02.007]
  25. Guralnick ML, Fritel X, Tarcan T, Espuna-Pons M, Rosier P. ICS educational module: cough stress test in the evaluation of female urinary incontinence: introducing the ICS-uniform cough stress test. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37(5):1849���55. [DOI: 10.1002/nau.23519]
  26. Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21(5):523���8. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-1069-5]
  27. Rogers RG, Espu��a Pons ME. The pelvic organ prolapse incontinence sexual questionnaire, IUGA-revised (PISQ-IR). Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(7):1063���4. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-012-1952-3]
  28. Nager CW, Brubaker L, Daneshgari F, Litman HJ, Dandreo KJ, Sirls L, et al. Design of the value of urodynamic evaluation (ValUE) trial: a non-inferiority randomized trial of preoperative urodynamic investigations. Contemp Clin Trials. 2009;30(6):531���9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.07.001]
  29. Zhang C, Chen Y, Liu S, Chen J, Shen H, Luo D. Effect of vaginal energy-based treatment on female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol. 2023;41(2):405���11. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04247-1]
  30. Gambacciani M, Cervigni M, Gaspar A, Novakov Miki�� A, Gaviria J, Koron N, et al. Safety of vaginal erbium laser: a review of 113,000 patients treated in the past 8 years. Climacteric. 2020;23(Supp1):S28���32. [DOI: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1813098]
  31. Ranjbar A, Mehrnoush V, Darsareh F, Kotb A, Zakaria A, Shekari M, et al. Vaginal laser therapy for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of prospective randomized clinical trials. J Menopausal Med. 2022;28(3):103���11. [DOI: 10.6118/jmm.22017]
  32. Zhang C, Chen Y, Liu S, Chen J, Shen H, Luo D. Effect of vaginal energy-based treatment on female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Urol. 2023;41(2):405���11. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04247-1]
  33. Joint Writing Group of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association. Joint report on the terminology for surgical procedures to treat stress urinary incontinence in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31(3):465���78. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04237-0]
  34. Mackova K, Van daele L, Page A-S, Geraerts I, Krofta L, Deprest J. Laser therapy for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review. BJOG. 2020;127(11):1338���46. [DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16273]
  35. B�� K, Angl��s-Acedo S, Batra A, Br��kken IH, Chan YL, Jorge CH, et al. International urogynecology consultation chapter 3 committee 2; conservative treatment of patient with pelvic organ prolapse: Pelvic floor muscle training. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2633���67. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05324-0]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lasertreatmentPFMTSUIsubjectivepatientsurinaryincontinencechange4adverseeventsgroupvaginalEr:YAGfloormuscletrainingwomenmildmoderatemonthsUDI-6objective24 monthssamplesizenon-inferioritystudymeanyetSDPelvicStressINTRODUCTIONANDHYPOTHESIS:CurrentstudiestherapymanagementstressinconclusivemanylackcomparisonanotherconservativeThereforecomparedefficacypelvicMETHODS:Single-centrerandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparing3-6applications9-18sessionsMainoutcomemeasuresincludedsymptomsbaselinerandomisationUrogenitalDistressInventory-6primaryoutcomesprioricalculationresulted28perarmhigherexpecteddropoutearlyincreased5660withoutunblindingdataRESULTS:SixtyenrolledTwoparticipantsdiscontinuedallocatedonedifferencescores-69995%CI���=���-2234837demonstratingp���=���0023Withingroupsimprovedcurereachedminoritylaser:11%[328]PFMT:8%[226]numbervisits251171004636inter-groupdifferencesmajorityrequestedadditionalalternativeserioustimepointCONCLUSIONS:TreatmenteffectcomparablelimitedshortlastingreportedVaginalErbiumLaserVersusFloorMuscleTrainingUrinaryIncontinence:RandomisedControlledTrialNon-ablativePhysiotherapy

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.