Avoiding global deforestation by taxing land in agricultural production: the implications for global markets.

Eric C Davis, Maros Ivanic, Brent Sohngen
Author Information
  1. Eric C Davis: United States Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service, Kansas City, MO, 64105, USA. eric.davis3@usda.gov.
  2. Maros Ivanic: United States Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service, Kansas City, MO, 64105, USA.
  3. Brent Sohngen: Department of Agricultural, Environmental, & Development Economics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.

Abstract

The projected growth in population and incomes is expected to create pressure to convert forestland into farmland. At the same time, the increasingly negative climate impacts are expected to generate further pressure to enhance the terrestrial carbon sink. Even though these goals are incompatible as reversing the deforestation trend by afforesting cropland would result in negative market impacts such as higher food prices, using the GTAP and GTM models, we find that these impacts would be relatively small if the goal of preserving 144.2 million hectares of forestland that otherwise would be converted to agricultural land by 2033 is achieved through a tax on land use in agricultural production. As to the economic price for doing so, the avoided deforestation would in most regions of the world result in less agricultural output and higher market prices. This is estimated to impact the well-being of global consumers by $119.7 billion, which translates to a global average cost of $13.78 per person in 2033.

References

  1. Science. 2019 Oct 18;366(6463): [PMID: 31624184]
  2. Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 19;13(1):5490 [PMID: 36123337]
  3. Sci Total Environ. 2021 Feb 25;757:143824 [PMID: 33250240]
  4. Glob Chang Biol. 2020 Mar;26(3):1576-1591 [PMID: 31655005]
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3465-72 [PMID: 21321211]
  6. Nat Commun. 2015 Mar 31;6:6603 [PMID: 25824529]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 7;107(49):20917-22 [PMID: 21078977]
  8. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 21;110(21):8363-8 [PMID: 23671086]
  9. Science. 2019 Jul 5;365(6448):76-79 [PMID: 31273120]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 31;114(44):11645-11650 [PMID: 29078344]

Grants

  1. 58-3000-1-0120/United States Department of Agriculture, United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0agriculturalglobalimpactsdeforestationlandexpectedpressureforestlandnegativeresultmarkethigherprices2033projectedgrowthpopulationincomescreateconvertfarmlandtimeincreasinglyclimategenerateenhanceterrestrialcarbonsinkEventhoughgoalsincompatiblereversingtrendafforestingcroplandfoodusingGTAPGTMmodelsfindrelativelysmallgoalpreserving1442millionhectaresotherwiseconvertedachievedtaxuseproductioneconomicpriceavoidedregionsworldlessoutputestimatedimpactwell-beingconsumers$1197billiontranslatesaveragecost$1378perpersonAvoidingtaxingproduction:implicationsmarkets

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.