Correlating Migrainous Features With Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Vestibular Migraine.

Yun-Chen Huang, Yi-Ho Young
Author Information
  1. Yun-Chen Huang: Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan. ORCID
  2. Yi-Ho Young: Department of Otolaryngology, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei, Taiwan. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to find biomarkers for assessing migrainous features, that is, migrainous headache, sensitivity to sound and light (phono- and photophobia) and visual aura in vestibular migraine (VM) patients.
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: University hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 400 definitive VM patients were classified into four groups based on the number of migrainous features. Group A (n���=���45) had one migrainous feature (migrainous headache). Group B (n���=���70) had migrainous headache along with phono- and photophobia, while Group C (n���=���55) had migrainous headache and visual aura. Those with all three migrainous features were categorised in Group D (n���=���230). Another 40 healthy subjects were also enrolled for comparison.
MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE: All subjects underwent an inner ear test battery comprising audiometry, cervical, ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP, oVEMP) and caloric tests.
RESULTS: Significant difference in mean age was observed in Group A when compared to Groups B-D, indicating that younger age might not be associated with the manifestation of all three migrainous features. No significant difference was observed among the four groups irrespective of gender and inner ear test battery. Via multivariate logistic regression, the oVEMP test (adjusted odds ratio, aOR���=���2.60) was superior to the cVEMP test as a stronger indicator for the presence of phono- and photophobia. Conversely, the cVEMP test (aOR���=���2.59) served as a stronger indicator for the presence of visual aura than the oVEMP test.
CONCLUSION: The oVEMP test may act as a biomarker for phono- and photophobia, whereas the cVEMP test shows a strong capacity to predict visual aura.

Keywords

References

  1. R. W. Baloh, ���Neurotology of Migraine,��� Headache 37 (1997): 615���621.
  2. A. Radtke, T. Lempert, M. A. Gresty, et al., ���Migraine and M��ni��re's Disease. Is There a Link?,��� Neurology 59 (2002): 1700���1704.
  3. Y. H. Young, ���Potential Application of Ocular and Cervical Vestibular���Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Meniere's Disease: A Review,��� Laryngoscope 123 (2013): 484���491.
  4. M. G. Zuniga, K. L. Janky, M. C. Schubert, and J. P. Carey, ���Can Vestibular���Evoked Myogenic Potentials Help Differentiate M��ni��re Disease From Vestibular Migraine?,��� Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 146 (2012): 788���796.
  5. R. L. Taylor, A. S. Zagami, W. P. Gibson, et al., ���Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials to Sound and Vibration: Characteristics in Vestibular Migraine That Enable Separation From Meniere's Disease,��� Cephalalgia 32 (2012): 213���225, https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102411434166.
  6. L. S. Basser, ���Benign Paroxysmal Vertigo of Childhood,��� Brain 87 (1964): 141���152.
  7. K. Y. Lin, Y. S. Hsu, and Y. H. Young, ���Brainstem Lesion in Benign Paroxysmal Vertigo Children: Evaluated by a Combined Ocular and Cervical Vestibular���Evoked Myogenic Potential Test,��� International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 74 (2010): 523���527.
  8. L. J. Liao and Y. H. Young, ���Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Basilar Artery Migraine,��� Laryngoscope 114 (2004): 1305���1309.
  9. C. T. Wang, M. S. Lai, and Y. H. Young, ���Relationship Between Basilar Type Migraine and Migrainous Vertigo,��� Headache 49 (2009): 426���434.
  10. T. Lempert, J. Olesen, J. Furman, et al., ���Vestibular Migraine: Diagnostic Criteria (Upadated),��� Journal of Vestibular Research 32 (2022): 1���6.
  11. C. C. Tseng, S. J. Wang, and Y. H. Young, ���Comparison of Bone���Conducted Vibration for Eliciting Ocular Vestibular���Evoked Myogenic Potentials: Forehead Versus Mastoid Tapping,��� Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery 146 (2012): 289���294.
  12. B. Y. Lin and Y. H. Young, ���Assessing Residual Vestibular Function in Adults With Congenital Hearing Loss,��� European Archives of Oto���Rhino���Laryngology 273 (2016): 4209���4214.
  13. T. Lempert and H. Neuhauser, ���Epidemiology of Vertigo, Migraine and Vestibular Migraine,��� Journal of Neurology 256 (2009): 333���338.
  14. H. Neuhauser, M. Leopold, M. von Brevern, G. Arnold, and T. Lempert, ���The Interrelations of Migraine, Vertigo and Migrainous Vertigo,��� Neurology 56 (2001): 436���441.
  15. J. M. Furman, D. A. Marcus, and C. D. Balaban, ���Vestibular Migraine: Clinical Aspects and Pathophysiology,��� Lancet Neurology 12 (2013): 706���715.
  16. C. D. Balaban, ���Migraine, Vertigo and Migrainous Vertigo: Links Between Vestibular and Pain Mechanisms,��� Journal of Vestibular Research 21 (2011): 315���321.
  17. Z. Vass, S. E. Shore, A. L. Nuttall, and J. M. Miller, ���Direct Evidence of Trigeminal Innervation of the Cochlear Blood Vessels,��� Neuroscience 84 (1998): 559���567.
  18. C. Iadecola, ���From CSD to Headache: A Long and Winding Road,��� Nature Medicine 8 (2002): 110���112.
  19. H. G. Rizk, Y. F. Liu, C. C. Strange, et al., ���Predictive Value of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in the Diagnosis of Meni��re's Disease and Vestibular Migraine,��� Otology & Neurotology 41 (2020): 828���835.
  20. H. C. Su, T. W. Huang, Y. H. Young, and P. W. Cheng, ���Aging Effect on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential,��� Otology & Neurotology 25 (2004): 977���980.
  21. C. L. Tseng, C. H. Chou, and Y. H. Young, ���Aging Effect on the Ocular Vestibular���Evoked Myogenic Potential Results,��� Otology & Neurotology 31 (2010): 959���963.
  22. K. Okamoto, R. Thompson, A. Tashiro, Z. Chang, and D. A. Bereiter, ���Bright Light Produces Fos���Positive Neurons in Caudal Trigeminal Brainstem,��� Neuroscience 160 (2009): 858���864.
  23. A. Zaleski, J. Bogle, A. Starling, et al., ���Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Patients With Vestibular Migraine,��� Otology & Neurotology 36 (2015): 295���302.
  24. C. Fujimoto, T. Kamogashira, S. Takenouchi, et al., ���Utriculo���Ocular Pathway Dysfunction Is More Frequent in Vestibular Migraine Than Probable Vestibular Migraine,��� Journal of Neurology 267 (2020): 2340���2346.
  25. N. Hadjikhani, M. Sanchez Del Rio, O. Wu, et al., ���Mechanisms of Migraine Aura Revealed by Functional MRI in Human Visual Cortex,��� Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98 (2001): 4687���4692.

Grants

  1. NSTC 112-2314-B418-003/National Science and Technology Council (TW)
  2. FEMH 113-2314-B418-004/National Science and Technology Council (TW)
  3. /Far Eastern Memorial Hospital

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0migrainoustestphotophobiavisualauraGroupfeaturesheadachephono-cVEMPoVEMPstudyvestibularmigraineVMpatientsfourgroupsthreesubjectsinnerearbatterymyogenicpotentialdifferenceageobservedaOR���=���2strongerindicatorpresenceOBJECTIVE:aimedfindbiomarkersassessingsensitivitysoundlightDESIGN:retrospectivecohortSETTING:UniversityhospitalPARTICIPANTS:total400definitiveclassifiedbasednumbern���=���45onefeatureBn���=���70alongCn���=���55categorisedDn���=���230Another40healthyalsoenrolledcomparisonMAINOUTCOMESMEASURE:underwentcomprisingaudiometrycervicalocularvestibular-evokedcalorictestsRESULTS:SignificantmeancomparedGroupsB-DindicatingyoungermightassociatedmanifestationsignificantamongirrespectivegenderViamultivariatelogisticregressionadjustedoddsratio60superiorConversely59servedCONCLUSION:mayactbiomarkerwhereasshowsstrongcapacitypredictCorrelatingMigrainousFeaturesVestibular-EvokedMyogenicPotentialsVestibularMigrainephonophobiavestibular���evoked

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.