Pathogenic germline variants in patients with early-onset colorectal cancer according to phenotype.

Antoine Dardenne, Marion Dhooge, No��mie Basset, Albain Chansavang, Julie Metras, Solenne Farelly, Jeanne Netter, Florence Coulet, Patrick R Benusiglio
Author Information
  1. Antoine Dardenne: Sorbonne Universit��, Service de Chirurgie digestive, H��pital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France.
  2. Marion Dhooge: Paris Cit�� Universit��, Service de Gastroent��rologie et Oncologie digestive, UF d'Oncog��n��tique digestive, H��pital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France. ORCID
  3. No��mie Basset: Sorbonne Universit��, H��pital Piti��-Salp��tri��re, D��partement de G��n��tique m��dicale, APHP, Paris, France.
  4. Albain Chansavang: D��partement de M��decine G��nomique des Tumeurs et Cancers, H��pital Cochin, APHP, Universit�� Paris Cit��, Paris, France. ORCID
  5. Julie Metras: Sorbonne Universit��, Service de Chirurgie digestive, H��pital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France.
  6. Solenne Farelly: Paris Cit�� Universit��, Service de Gastroent��rologie et Oncologie digestive, UF d'Oncog��n��tique digestive, H��pital Cochin, APHP, Paris, France.
  7. Jeanne Netter: Sorbonne Universit��, Service de Chirurgie digestive, H��pital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France.
  8. Florence Coulet: Sorbonne Universit��, H��pital Piti��-Salp��tri��re, D��partement de G��n��tique m��dicale, APHP, Paris, France.
  9. Patrick R Benusiglio: Sorbonne Universit��, Service de Chirurgie digestive, H��pital Saint-Antoine, APHP, Paris, France. patrick.benusiglio@aphp.fr. ORCID

Abstract

We assessed retrospectively the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants (PGV) in 268 French adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) before age 41, stratified by phenotype. APC, BMPR1A, CDH1, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, MUTYH, NTHL1, POLE, POLD1, PTEN, PMS2, SMAD4, STK11 and TP53 were analyzed. Overall, 21.6% of cases carried a PGV. A high prevalence was observed in Mismatch Repair-deficient (MMRd) CRC (60.1%, MMR genes) and polyposis-associated CRC (48%, APC, MUTYH and MSH3-biallelic, POLE). Only 2.3% of patients with MMR proficient and without polyposis carried a PGV. The genes involved in this third group were POLE and MSH2, and three out of four cases had either two synchronous CRC or a CRC family history. Phenotypic features should be taken into account for testing decision. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of testing all CRC cases <���41 years, as well as how it aligns with the constraints of various healthcare systems, is warranted.

References

  1. NCCN Guidelines Version 3. 2024 Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Colorectal, Endometrial, and Gastric [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2024 Nov 6]. Available from: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/genetics_ceg.pdf .
  2. Lecomte T, Tougeron D, Chautard R, Bressand D, Bibeau F, Blanc B, et al. Non-metastatic colon cancer: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, AFEF, and SFR). Dig Liver Dis. 2024;56:756���69. [DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.208]
  3. Stjepanovic N, Moreira L, Carneiro F, Balaguer F, Cervantes A, Balma��a J, et al. Hereditary gastrointestinal cancers: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ��� Ann Oncol 2019;30:1558���71. [DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz233]
  4. Coughlin SE, Heald B, Clark DF, Nielsen SM, Hatchell KE, Esplin ED, et al. Multigene Panel Testing Yields High Rates of Clinically Actionable Variants Among Patients With Colorectal Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022;6:e2200517. [DOI: 10.1200/PO.22.00517]
  5. You YN, Moskowitz JB, Chang GJ, Mork ME, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Bednarski BK, et al. Germline Cancer Risk Profiles of Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Findings From a Prospective Universal Germline Testing and Telegenetics Program. Dis Colon Rectum. 2023;66:531. [DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002347]
  6. Dhooge M, Baert-Desurmont S, Corsini C, Caron O, Andrieu N, Berthet P, et al. National recommendations of the French Genetics and Cancer Group - Unicancer on the modalities of multi-genes panel analyses in hereditary predispositions to tumors of the digestive tract. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:104080. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2020.104080]
  7. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405���24. [DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.30]
  8. Stoffel EM, Koeppe E, Everett J, Ulintz P, Kiel M, Osborne J, et al. Germline Genetic Features of Young Individuals With Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:897���905.e1. [DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.11.004]
  9. Yurgelun MB, Masciari S, Joshi VA, Mercado RC, Lindor NM, Gallinger S, et al. Germline TP53 Mutations in Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the Colon Cancer Family Registry. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1:214���21. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.0197]
  10. Ranganathan M, Sacca RE, Trottier M, Maio A, Kemel Y, Salo-Mullen E, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Implications of Mismatch Repair-Proficient Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Lynch Syndrome. JCO Precis Oncol. 2023;e2200675.
  11. Pearlman R, Frankel WL, Swanson B, Zhao W, Yilmaz A, Miller K, et al. Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline Cancer Susceptibility Gene Mutations Among Patients With Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:464���71. [DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5194]
  12. Tung N, Ricker C, Messersmith H, Balma��a J, Domchek S, Stoffel EM, et al. Selection of Germline Genetic Testing Panels in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42:2599���615. [DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00662]
  13. Valle L, Katz LH, Latchford A, Mur P, Moreno V, Frayling IM, et al. Position statement of the International Society for Gastrointestinal Hereditary Tumours (InSiGHT) on APC I1307K and cancer risk. J Med Genet. 2023;60:1035���43. [DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108984]
  14. Mundt E, Mabey B, Rainville I, Ricker C, Singh N, Gardiner A, et al. Breast and colorectal cancer risks among over 6,000 CHEK2 pathogenic variant carriers: A comparison of missense versus truncating variants. Cancer Genet. 2023;278���279:84���90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2023.10.002]
  15. Pope BJ, Clendenning M, Rosty C, Mahmood K, Georgeson P, Joo JE, et al. Germline and Tumor Sequencing as a Diagnostic Tool To Resolve Suspected Lynch Syndrome. J Mol Diagn JMD. 2021;23:358���71. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.12.003]
  16. Te Paske IB, Mensenkamp AR, Neveling K, Baert-Desurmont S, Claes KBM, de Leeneer K, et al. Noncoding Aberrations in Mismatch Repair Genes Underlie a Substantial Part of the Missing Heritability in Lynch Syndrome. Gastroenterology. 2022;163:1691���94.e7. [DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.041]
  17. Bj��rnstad PM, Aal��kken R, ��sheim J, Sundaram AYM, Felde CN, ��stby GH, et al. A 39 kb structural variant causing Lynch Syndrome detected by optical genome mapping and nanopore sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024;32:513���20. [DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01494-7]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CRCPGVpatientsPOLEcasesprevalencegermlinevariantscolorectalcancerphenotypeAPCMSH2MUTYHcarriedMMRgenestestingassessedretrospectivelypathogenic268Frenchadultdiagnosedage41stratifiedBMPR1ACDH1EPCAMMLH1MSH3MSH6NTHL1POLD1PTENPMS2SMAD4STK11TP53analyzedOverall216%highobservedMismatchRepair-deficientMMRd601%polyposis-associated48%MSH3-biallelic23%proficientwithoutpolyposisinvolvedthirdgroupthreefoureithertwosynchronousfamilyhistoryPhenotypicfeaturestakenaccountdecisionEvaluatingcost-effectiveness<���41yearswellalignsconstraintsvarioushealthcaresystemswarrantedPathogenicearly-onsetaccording

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.