Decomposing Variations on Cluster Level for Binary Outcomes in Application to Cancer Care Disparity Studies.

Hajime Uno, Angela C Tramontano, Rinaa S Punglia, Michael J Hassett
Author Information
  1. Hajime Uno: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. ORCID
  2. Angela C Tramontano: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. ORCID
  3. Rinaa S Punglia: Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  4. Michael J Hassett: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a method to decompose the observed variance of binary outcomes (proportions) aggregated by regional clusters to determine targets for quality improvement efforts to reduce regional variations.
DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Data from the 2018 linkage of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database.
STUDY DESIGN: We developed a method to decompose the observed regional-level variance into four attributions: random, patients' characteristics, regional cluster, and unexplained. To demonstrate the efficacy of the method, we conducted a series of numerical studies. We applied this method to our cohort to analyze endocrine therapy receipt 3-5���years after diagnosis, using health service area (HSA) as the regional cluster.
DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: Our cohort included Stages I-III breast cancer patients diagnosed at ages 66-79 between 2007 and 2013 who received cancer surgery and were enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: After decomposition, 39% of the total variation was explained by HSAs, which was higher than that in some other breast cancer measures, such as the proportion of Stage I at diagnosis (4%), previously reported. This suggests geospatial efforts have a great potential to address the regional variation regarding this measure.
CONCLUSIONS: Our variance decomposition method provides direct information about attributable variance in the proportions at a cluster level. This technique can help in the identification of intervention targets to improve regional variations in the quality of care and clinical outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Dartmouth Atlas Projects, ���The Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care,��� accessed August 1, 2022, https://www.dartmouthatlas.org/.
  2. L. Dwyer���Lindgren, A. Bertozzi���Villa, R. W. Stubbs, et al., ���US County���Level Trends in Mortality Rates for Major Causes of Death, 1980���2014,��� Journal of the American Medical Association 316, no. 22 (2016): 2385���2401, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.13645.
  3. J. H. Silber, P. R. Rosenbaum, A. S. Clark, et al., ���Characteristics Associated With Differences in Survival Among Black and White Women With Breast Cancer,��� Journal of the American Medical Association 310, no. 4 (2013): 389, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.8272.
  4. J. K. Kish, M. Yu, A. Percy���Laurry, and S. F. Altekruse, ���Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Survival by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Registries,��� Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs 2014, no. 49 (2014): 236���243.
  5. J. H. Silber, P. R. Rosenbaum, R. N. Ross, et al., ���Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival by Socioeconomic Status Despite Medicare and Medicaid Insurance,��� Milbank Quarterly 96, no. 4 (2018): 706���754.
  6. R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, ���Cancer Statistics, 2019,��� CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 69, no. 1 (2019): 7���34.
  7. American Cancer Society, ���Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2022���2024,��� accessed January 9, 2023, https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer���facts���statistics/breast���cancer���facts���figures.html.
  8. A. H. Mokdad, L. Dwyer���Lindgren, C. Fitzmaurice, et al., ���Trends and Patterns of Disparities in Cancer Mortality Among US Counties, 1980���2014,��� Journal of the American Medical Association 317, no. 4 (2017): 388���406, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.20324.
  9. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), ���Effects of Chemotherapy and Hormonal Therapy for Early Breast Cancer on Recurrence and 15���Year Survival: An Overview of the Randomised Trials,��� Lancet 365, no. 9472 (2005): 1687���1717.
  10. M. J. Hassett, A. C. Tramontano, H. Uno, D. P. Ritzwoller, and R. S. Punglia, ���Geospatial Disparities in the Treatment of Curable Breast Cancer Across the US,��� JAMA Oncology 8, no. 3 (2022): 445���449.
  11. G. M. Fitzmaurice, N. M. Laird, and J. H. Ware, Applied Longitudinal Analysis (John Wiley & Sons, 2012).
  12. S. M. Eldridge, O. C. Ukoumunne, and J. B. Carlin, ���The Intra���Cluster Correlation Coefficient in Cluster Randomized Trials: A Review of Definitions,��� International Statistical Review 77, no. 3 (2009): 378���394, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751���5823.2009.00092.x.
  13. M. E. Charlson, P. Pompei, K. L. Ales, and C. R. MacKenzie, ���A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation,��� Journal of Chronic Diseases 40, no. 5 (1987): 373���383.
  14. R. A. Deyo, D. C. Cherkin, and M. A. Ciol, ���Adapting a Clinical Comorbidity Index for Use With ICD���9���CM Administrative Databases,��� Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 45, no. 6 (1992): 613���619.
  15. P. S. Romano, L. L. Roos, and J. G. Jollis, ���Adapting a Clinical Comorbidity Index for Use With ICD���9���CM Administrative Data: Differing Perspectives,��� Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 46, no. 10 (1993): 1075���1079.

Grants

  1. P30CA006516/DFCI Nodal Award Program
  2. RSG-18-097-01-CPPB/American Cancer Society
  3. R01GM152499/The National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  4. /The McGraw/Patterson Research Fund

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0regionalmethodvariancequalityvariationsclustercancerdecomposeobservedoutcomesproportionstargetseffortsDATAcohortdiagnosisbreastdecompositionvariationmeasureOBJECTIVE:developbinaryaggregatedclustersdetermineimprovementreduceSOURCESANDSTUDYSETTING:Data2018linkageSurveillanceEpidemiologyEndResults-MedicaredatabaseSTUDYDESIGN:developedregional-levelfourattributions:randompatients'characteristicsunexplaineddemonstrateefficacyconductedseriesnumericalstudiesappliedanalyzeendocrinetherapyreceipt3-5���yearsusinghealthserviceareaHSAEXTRACTIONMETHODS:includedStagesI-IIIpatientsdiagnosedages66-7920072013receivedsurgeryenrolledMedicarePartsBPRINCIPALFINDINGS:39%totalexplainedHSAshighermeasuresproportionStage4%previouslyreportedsuggestsgeospatialgreatpotentialaddressregardingCONCLUSIONS:providesdirectinformationattributableleveltechniquecanhelpidentificationinterventionimprovecareclinicalDecomposingVariationsClusterLevelBinaryOutcomesApplicationCancerCareDisparityStudiesintraclasscorrelationlogisticregressionmixed���effectsmodelssimulations

Similar Articles

Cited By