Exploring Problematic TikTok Use and Mental Health Issues: A Systematic Review of Empirical Studies.

Lakshit Jain, Luis Velez, Surya Karlapati, Mary Forand, Rajasekhar Kannali, Rao Ahmed Yousaf, Rizwan Ahmed, Zouina Sarfraz, Pearl A Sutter, Christian Anthony Tallo, Saeed Ahmed
Author Information
  1. Lakshit Jain: University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
  2. Luis Velez: University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT, USA.
  3. Surya Karlapati: Oregon State Hospital, Salem, OR, USA.
  4. Mary Forand: Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
  5. Rajasekhar Kannali: Novant Health Psychiatric Associates-Randolph, Charlotte, NC, USA.
  6. Rao Ahmed Yousaf: Faisalabad Medical University, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan. ORCID
  7. Rizwan Ahmed: University of Karachi, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
  8. Zouina Sarfraz: Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan. ORCID
  9. Pearl A Sutter: University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  10. Christian Anthony Tallo: University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
  11. Saeed Ahmed: Saint Francis Hospital & Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since its launch in 2017, TikTok has rapidly emerged as a major player in the digital landscape, amassing over a billion active users. Its engaging features have raised concerns about potential problematic use and negative mental health outcomes. Despite increasing scholarly attention, a consolidated understanding of TikTok's problematic use potential and implications remains elusive This systematic review synthesizes empirical research on problematic TikTok use and its impact on mental health.
METHODS: This review followed PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines and conducted a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases until July 10, 2024. Keywords included terms related to TikTok use, addiction, and problematic use. Studies were included based on empirical focus and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Data extraction comprised study characteristics, measures of TikTok problematic use, and related mental health outcomes. Quality assessment used JBI, Cochrane's RoB 2, MMAT, CASP, and NOS tools. The protocol was registered in OSF: https://osf.io/cjf97.
RESULTS: This review included 26 studies, involving a total of 11 462 participants. The pooled prevalence of TikTok use was estimated at 80.19%, with the highest rates observed among people aged 18 to 29 years, where it reached 85.4%. Frequent use of TikTok was closely linked with an increase in symptoms of anxiety and depression, especially in users aged under 24 years. Female users were more likely to experience problematic TikTok use, with 67.3% of such cases found among female university students. Moreover, higher addiction scores were noted among individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and those who had higher levels of neuroticism.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this review highlight the growing concern surrounding the impact of problematic TikTok use on mental health, particularly among younger and more vulnerable populations. It is imperative for stakeholders to prioritize the integration of digital literacy and media literacy into educational curricula. Moreover, the involvement of caregivers through guided mediation and the establishment of clear usage parameters could play a crucial role in managing screen time, particularly for younger users. To improve the current landscape of empirical research, longitudinal and interventional research is warranted.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022 Oct;40:97-105 [PMID: 36064253]
  2. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2024 Jan;43(1):36-44 [PMID: 36917507]
  3. Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Apr;39(7):1179-88 [PMID: 24712997]
  4. Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;9:641673 [PMID: 33816425]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3): [PMID: 36767464]
  6. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2022 May;25(5):287-293 [PMID: 35512731]
  7. Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 11;14(1):5864 [PMID: 38467750]
  8. Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 01;13:992824 [PMID: 36532978]
  9. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;17(13): [PMID: 32630054]
  10. Alcohol Alcohol. 2024 Mar 16;59(3): [PMID: 38619423]
  11. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Aug;248:104369 [PMID: 38936231]
  12. Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):680-689 [PMID: 28108188]
  13. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jun;22(2):135-142 [PMID: 32699513]
  14. J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):44-52 [PMID: 29484779]
  15. Neuroimage. 2019 Oct 15;200:313-331 [PMID: 31229660]
  16. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  17. Nature. 2019 Jan;565(7739):265-266 [PMID: 30643305]
  18. Health Educ Res. 2022 May 24;37(3):167-184 [PMID: 35543267]
  19. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2022 Jul;41(5):1119-1125 [PMID: 35073422]
  20. J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 22;13(5): [PMID: 38592070]
  21. Eat Behav. 2023 Aug;50:101793 [PMID: 37633221]
  22. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):279-306 [PMID: 35689365]
  23. Cureus. 2024 Mar 21;16(3):e56631 [PMID: 38646360]
  24. BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 17;12(1):81 [PMID: 38368362]
  25. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Dec 1;229(Pt A):109147 [PMID: 34749199]
  26. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 06;13:932805 [PMID: 36148123]
  27. Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):251-254 [PMID: 34312317]
  28. Cureus. 2023 Nov 3;15(11):e48227 [PMID: 38050505]
  29. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 28;14:1068431 [PMID: 37056408]
  30. Addict Behav. 2022 Jun;129:107259 [PMID: 35091200]
  31. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;195(3):249-56 [PMID: 19721116]
  32. JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Jul 5;4:e53233 [PMID: 38967966]
  33. Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 15;237:118136 [PMID: 33951514]
  34. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2010 Apr;16(2):144-51 [PMID: 20438152]
  35. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Sep;15(5):1143-1157 [PMID: 32603635]
  36. Psychol Sci. 2016 Jul;27(7):1027-35 [PMID: 27247125]

MeSH Term

Humans
Mental Health
Mental Disorders
Internet Addiction Disorder
Social Media
Female

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0useTikTokproblematicmentalhealthaddictiondigitalusersreviewamongempiricalresearchincludedliteracymedialandscapepotentialoutcomesimpactrelatedStudiesagedMoreoverhigherparticularlyyoungersocialBACKGROUND:Sincelaunch2017rapidlyemergedmajorplayeramassingbillionactiveengagingfeaturesraisedconcernsnegativeDespiteincreasingscholarlyattentionconsolidatedunderstandingTikTok'simplicationsremainselusivesystematicsynthesizesMETHODS:followedPRISMAStatement2020guidelinesconductedcomprehensivesearchacrossPubMedEmbaseScopusWebSciencePsycINFOdatabasesJuly102024Keywordstermsbasedfocuspublicationpeer-reviewedjournalsDataextractioncomprisedstudycharacteristicsmeasuresQualityassessmentusedJBICochrane'sRoB2MMATCASPNOStoolsprotocolregisteredOSF:https://osfio/cjf97RESULTS:26studiesinvolvingtotal11 462participantspooledprevalenceestimated8019%highestratesobservedpeople1829 yearsreached854%Frequentcloselylinkedincreasesymptomsanxietydepressionespecially24 yearsFemalelikelyexperience673%casesfoundfemaleuniversitystudentsscoresnotedindividualslowersocioeconomicbackgroundslevelsneuroticismCONCLUSION:findingshighlightgrowingconcernsurroundingvulnerablepopulationsimperativestakeholdersprioritizeintegrationeducationalcurriculainvolvementcaregiversguidedmediationestablishmentclearusageparametersplaycrucialrolemanagingscreentimeimprovecurrentlongitudinalinterventionalwarrantedExploringProblematicUseMentalHealthIssues:SystematicReviewEmpiricalpsychiatry

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.