Plant behavior: Theoretical and technological advances.

Margherita Bianchi, Sara Avesani, Bianca Bonato, Marco Dadda, Silvia Guerra, Laura Ravazzolo, Valentina Simonetti, Umberto Castiello
Author Information
  1. Margherita Bianchi: Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy. Electronic address: margherita.bianchi@unipd.it.
  2. Sara Avesani: Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
  3. Bianca Bonato: Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
  4. Marco Dadda: Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
  5. Silvia Guerra: Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
  6. Laura Ravazzolo: DAFNAE-Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padua, Italy.
  7. Valentina Simonetti: Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.
  8. Umberto Castiello: Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Italy.

Abstract

The widespread disregard for plant behavior is gradually being overcome through more inclusive theoretical approaches and the development of appropriate and advanced technologies. In this paper we review scientific evidence on recent contributions to the study of plants, such as movement and communication as well as potential forms of attention. Some of the most recent contributions to the study of plant abilities come from comparative studies on biocommunication and research on the accuracy of plants in responding to different environmental stimuli through electrophysiological and kinematical analyses in different context (e.g., individual and social). Furthermore, an underexplored area that warrants further investigation is plants' multisensory perception and its potential link to multimodal communication capabilities. Research into this set of abilities could help to clarify the degree of behavioral flexibility in sessile organisms without a nervous system and enhance discussions on interactive behavior as expressed in nature. This, in turn, will help to bridge the gap between studies on animal organisms and the rest of the living world.

References

  1. J Comp Psychol. 2021 Feb;135(1):127-141 [PMID: 32496081]
  2. AoB Plants. 2023 Dec 20;16(1):plad088 [PMID: 38192569]
  3. Plant Signal Behav. 2017 Mar 4;12(3):e1290040 [PMID: 28277967]
  4. Plant Physiol. 2016 Jul;171(3):1606-15 [PMID: 27208294]
  5. Molecules. 2017 Sep 04;22(9): [PMID: 28869565]
  6. Plants (Basel). 2023 May 16;12(10): [PMID: 37653922]
  7. Integr Comp Biol. 2021 Oct 4;61(3):842-853 [PMID: 34009312]
  8. Plant Physiol. 1999 Oct;121(2):325-32 [PMID: 10517823]
  9. J R Soc Interface. 2017 Jun;14(131): [PMID: 28637913]
  10. Ann Bot. 2020 Jan 8;125(1):11-28 [PMID: 31563953]
  11. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:1449-1456 [PMID: 23956486]
  12. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):966-973 [PMID: 32542481]
  13. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2023 Oct;59:101086 [PMID: 37468044]
  14. Planta. 2007 Jun;226(1):203-14 [PMID: 17226028]
  15. Interface Focus. 2017 Jun 6;7(3):20160098 [PMID: 28479977]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 7;277(1686):1395-401 [PMID: 20053643]
  17. Bioelectrochemistry. 2017 Feb;113:60-68 [PMID: 27756010]
  18. Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 09;12:614471 [PMID: 33633644]
  19. Animals (Basel). 2021 Jun 22;11(7): [PMID: 34206479]
  20. Trends Neurosci. 2022 Oct;45(10):749-762 [PMID: 35853793]
  21. Curr Biol. 2010 May 11;20(9):R392-7 [PMID: 20462477]
  22. Am Nat. 2005 Aug;166(2):231-45 [PMID: 16032576]
  23. Plant Cell Environ. 2021 Apr;44(4):1095-1110 [PMID: 33274469]
  24. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):32-53 [PMID: 7707032]
  25. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 12;9(1):16570 [PMID: 31719580]
  26. Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 05;5:16135 [PMID: 26538281]
  27. Front Plant Sci. 2021 Mar 18;12:594195 [PMID: 33815431]
  28. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Mar 15;376(1820):20190750 [PMID: 33487107]
  29. Plant J. 2006 Feb;45(4):540-60 [PMID: 16441348]
  30. Plant Physiol. 2020 Apr;182(4):1624-1635 [PMID: 32132112]
  31. Commun Integr Biol. 2021 Aug 17;14(1):176-185 [PMID: 34434483]
  32. Bioelectrochemistry. 2020 Jun;133:107493 [PMID: 32145516]
  33. J Exp Psychol. 1954 Jun;47(6):381-91 [PMID: 13174710]
  34. Anal Chim Acta. 2021 Feb 22;1147:240-258 [PMID: 33485582]
  35. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013;67:1523-1539 [PMID: 23956487]
  36. J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 24;33(17):7463-74 [PMID: 23616552]
  37. Plant Signal Behav. 2021 Nov 2;16(11):1949818 [PMID: 34346847]

Grants

  1. 101096728/European Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plantbehaviorrecentcontributionsstudyplantscommunicationpotentialabilitiesstudiesdifferenthelporganismswidespreaddisregardgraduallyovercomeinclusivetheoreticalapproachesdevelopmentappropriateadvancedtechnologiespaperreviewscientificevidencemovementwellformsattentioncomecomparativebiocommunicationresearchaccuracyrespondingenvironmentalstimulielectrophysiologicalkinematicalanalysescontextegindividualsocialFurthermoreunderexploredareawarrantsinvestigationplants'multisensoryperceptionlinkmultimodalcapabilitiesResearchsetclarifydegreebehavioralflexibilitysessilewithoutnervoussystemenhancediscussionsinteractiveexpressednatureturnwillbridgegapanimalrestlivingworldPlantbehavior:Theoreticaltechnologicaladvances

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.