The Perceptions of Turkish Consumers Regarding In Vitro Meat and the Relationship Between These Perceptions and Willingness to Try and Consume In Vitro Meat.

Ayse Gulin Eser, P Dilara Kecici, Funda Yilmaz Eker, Bulent Ekiz
Author Information
  1. Ayse Gulin Eser: Department of Food Technology, Biga Vocational School, ��anakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Biga, ��anakkale, T��rkiye. ORCID
  2. P Dilara Kecici: Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University- Cerrahpa��a, Buyukcekmece Campus, Buyukcekmece, Istanbul, T��rkiye. ORCID
  3. Funda Yilmaz Eker: Department of Food Hygiene and Technology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpa��a, Avcilar, Istanbul, T��rkiye.
  4. Bulent Ekiz: Department of Animal Breeding and Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University- Cerrahpa��a, Buyukcekmece Campus, Buyukcekmece, Istanbul, T��rkiye. ORCID

Abstract

This study aims to determine Turkish consumers' perceptions and attitudes toward in vitro meat and to investigate the relationship between their perceptions and their willingness to try and consume it. The questionnaire was distributed to potential participants via social media, and the responses of 989 participants were evaluated. The responses regarding the extent to which participants agreed with 32 opinions about in vitro meat were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA). As a result of PCA, four components were obtained explaining 63.3% of the total variance: i) benefits for the environment, and human and animal welfare; ii) safety and reliability; iii) social and ethical concerns; and iv) concerns about being unnatural. Regression equations developed with these components were able to moderately explain (R ranged between 0.547 and 0.583) the variance observed in consumers' willingness to try, regularly consume, replace conventional meat with and try in vitro meat when recommended by a friend.

Keywords

References

  1. Meat Sci. 2022 Jun;188:108776 [PMID: 35245709]
  2. Front Nutr. 2020 Feb 07;7:7 [PMID: 32118026]
  3. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 30;14(8):e0221129 [PMID: 31469862]
  4. EMBO Rep. 2019 Jan;20(1): [PMID: 30552146]
  5. Meat Sci. 2015 Apr;102:49-58 [PMID: 25541372]
  6. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1889:111-125 [PMID: 30367412]
  7. Appetite. 2022 Mar 1;170:105829 [PMID: 34863794]
  8. Front Nutr. 2020 Sep 08;7:148 [PMID: 33015122]
  9. Meat Sci. 2012 Nov;92(3):297-301 [PMID: 22543115]
  10. PLoS One. 2017 Feb 16;12(2):e0171904 [PMID: 28207878]
  11. Meat Sci. 2018 May;139:213-219 [PMID: 29459297]
  12. Nutrients. 2023 Nov 02;15(21): [PMID: 37960301]
  13. Appetite. 2019 Jun 1;137:104-113 [PMID: 30840874]
  14. Animals (Basel). 2020 Apr 10;10(4): [PMID: 32290141]
  15. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2023 Jan-Feb;14(1):e790 [PMID: 37033200]
  16. Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 20;10:1043618 [PMID: 37408985]
  17. Appetite. 2021 Jan 1;156:104960 [PMID: 32920082]
  18. Meat Sci. 2020 Apr;162:107924 [PMID: 31732401]
  19. Foods. 2021 Feb 07;10(2): [PMID: 33562313]
  20. Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:428-437 [PMID: 29501683]
  21. Appetite. 2017 Jul 1;114:82-92 [PMID: 28323057]
  22. Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:168-79 [PMID: 24953197]
  23. Meat Sci. 2019 Apr;150:101-110 [PMID: 30616073]
  24. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001 Dec;40(Pt 4):471-99 [PMID: 11795063]
  25. Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jul 15;45(14):6117-23 [PMID: 21682287]
  26. Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:245-254 [PMID: 27717657]
  27. Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104814 [PMID: 32783971]

MeSH Term

Turkey
Humans
Meat
Female
Adult
Male
Consumer Behavior
Middle Aged
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Adolescent
Animals
In Vitro Meat

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0meatvitroTurkishperceptionstryparticipantsPCAconsumers'willingnessconsumesocialresponsescomponentsconcerns0PerceptionsVitroMeatstudyaimsdetermineattitudestowardinvestigaterelationshipquestionnairedistributedpotentialviamedia989evaluatedregardingextentagreed32opinionsanalysedusingprincipalcomponentanalysisresultfourobtainedexplaining633%totalvariance:benefitsenvironmenthumananimalwelfareiisafetyreliabilityiiiethicalivunnaturalRegressionequationsdevelopedablemoderatelyexplainRranged547583varianceobservedregularlyreplaceconventionalrecommendedfriendConsumersRegardingRelationshipWillingnessTryConsumeconsumersconsumer

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.