Antimicrobial stewardship initiative on prescribing at discharge from a community medical center.

Gargi Adenkar, Karan Raja, Brandon Chen, Donald Beggs, Christopher Cilderman, Mitesh Patel, Mona Philips
Author Information
  1. Gargi Adenkar: Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ, USA. ORCID
  2. Karan Raja: Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ, USA. ORCID
  3. Brandon Chen: Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ, USA.
  4. Donald Beggs: Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ, USA.
  5. Christopher Cilderman: Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ, USA.
  6. Mitesh Patel: Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ, USA.
  7. Mona Philips: Robert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health, Clara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, NJ, USA.

Abstract

Objective: Assess the impact of a multifaceted discharge antimicrobial stewardship initiative by comparing proportion of appropriate antimicrobial regimens before and after implementation.
Design: Cohort study.
Setting: Non-teaching, urban, community medical center.
Patients: Adult patients prescribed an oral antimicrobial regimen at discharge were included. Patients were randomized irrespective of encounter type or discharge disposition. Pregnant and post-partum patients were excluded.
Methods: A discharge antimicrobial stewardship program was implemented at our facility. Components of the initiative included development of a comprehensive, institution-specific, inpatient and outpatient prescribing guideline, extensive face-to-face clinician education, and real-time, pharmacist prospective audit and feedback at discharge. The validated National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey tool was used to then categorize one hundred randomized discharge antimicrobial prescriptions as appropriate (optimal or adequate), inappropriate (suboptimal or inadequate), or not assessable. Hospital-specific treatment guidelines, literature references, and patient-specific factors were used to determine appropriateness.
Results: One hundred antimicrobial regimens selected via random sampling were analyzed in each cohort. The proportion of appropriate antimicrobial regimens increased by 15% after program implementation (47% vs 62%, = .03).
Conclusions: Study results highlight the positive impact of a multidisciplinary, multipronged approach in improving discharge antimicrobial prescribing.

References

  1. Ann Pharmacother. 2022 Aug;56(8):869-877 [PMID: 34738475]
  2. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 28;67(8):1306-1307 [PMID: 29659764]
  3. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017 May;38(5):534-541 [PMID: 28260538]
  4. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211331 [PMID: 35536577]
  5. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2022 Nov 16;2(1):e185 [PMID: 36406165]
  6. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Feb 09;4(1):dlac012 [PMID: 35156035]
  7. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4499-e4506 [PMID: 32918077]
  8. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Jul 11;4(4):dlac065 [PMID: 35821743]
  9. BMC Infect Dis. 2018 May 16;18(1):225 [PMID: 29769028]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0dischargeantimicrobialstewardshipinitiativeappropriateregimensprescribingimpactproportionimplementationcommunitymedicalcenterpatientsincludedrandomizedprogramAntimicrobialusedhundredObjective:AssessmultifacetedcomparingDesign:CohortstudySetting:Non-teachingurbanPatients:AdultprescribedoralregimenPatientsirrespectiveencountertypedispositionPregnantpost-partumexcludedMethods:implementedfacilityComponentsdevelopmentcomprehensiveinstitution-specificinpatientoutpatientguidelineextensiveface-to-faceclinicianeducationreal-timepharmacistprospectiveauditfeedbackvalidatedNationalPrescribingSurveytoolcategorizeoneprescriptionsoptimaladequateinappropriatesuboptimalinadequateassessableHospital-specifictreatmentguidelinesliteraturereferencespatient-specificfactorsdetermineappropriatenessResults:Oneselectedviarandomsamplinganalyzedcohortincreased15%47%vs62%=03Conclusions:Studyresultshighlightpositivemultidisciplinarymultiprongedapproachimproving

Similar Articles

Cited By