TCA chemical peel as facial anti-aging therapy for postmenopausal women: a randomised clinical study.

Laura Piejko, Małgorzata Glenc-Ambroży, Jan Juszczyk, Joanna Czajkowska, Monika Bugdol, Mikołaj Łanocha, Beata Bergler-Czop, Anna Polak
Author Information
  1. Laura Piejko: Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.
  2. Małgorzata Glenc-Ambroży: Amber Academy Research Center, Rybnik, Poland.
  3. Jan Juszczyk: Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland.
  4. Joanna Czajkowska: Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland.
  5. Monika Bugdol: Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland.
  6. Mikołaj Łanocha: Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  7. Beata Bergler-Czop: Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  8. Anna Polak: Institute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.

Abstract

Introduction: A randomised controlled clinical trial involving a novel trichloroacetic acid (TCA) peel was performed. The experimental group, the placebo group, the staff administering treatments, the persons evaluating intervention results, and the statistical analyst were all blinded.
Aim: To assess the efficacy of a novel TCA peel containing urea peroxide 5%, coenzyme Q10 5%, and kojic acid 10% as anti-aging skin therapy for postmenopausal women.
Material and methods: Forty-six postmenopausal women at a mean age of 60.63 ±2.6 years were equally and randomly divided into an experimental group (EG; = 23) and a control group (CG; = 23), which received facial skin treatments with a TCA peel and a placebo solution, respectively. Treatment sessions were performed once weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. Between the sessions, the participants were required to apply the same post-peel cream in the morning and evening. Skin-aging parameters - hydration, elasticity, and sebum levels - were measured using the MC 750 B2 (Courage + Khazaka electronic GmbH, Cologne, Germany), wrinkle appearance was assessed based on photographs taken with the Fujifilm XT-1 camera, and the Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale and skin aesthetic improvement was rated using the Patient's Aesthetic Improvement Scale and the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale. All assessments were carried out pre- and post-intervention and at months 1 and 3 of follow-up.
Results: Skin hydration and participants' satisfaction with treatment results measured post-treatment and at month 3 of follow-up were greater in the EG than in the CG.
Conclusions: The TCA chemical peel improved facial skin hydration in postmenopausal women, but not skin elasticity. The results of the treatments were rated by the participants as satisfying.Trial Registration no: ISRCTN41899475; doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN41899475.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Feb 12;8:617068 [PMID: 33681250]
  2. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2020 Feb;13(2):53-57 [PMID: 32308785]
  3. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2021 Aug;38(4):629-635 [PMID: 34658706]
  4. J Dermatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):740-7 [PMID: 21352325]
  5. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016 Jun;33(3):199-205 [PMID: 27512355]
  6. Dermatol Res Pract. 2021 Aug 30;2021:3085670 [PMID: 34504524]
  7. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2023 Nov;22(11):3033-3041 [PMID: 37227430]
  8. Biometrics. 1977 Jun;33(2):363-74 [PMID: 884196]
  9. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2010 Mar;9(1):50-8 [PMID: 20367673]
  10. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Feb;19(1):e238-42 [PMID: 22650601]
  11. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Aug;40(8):883-91 [PMID: 25068547]
  12. Br J Dermatol. 2017 May;176(5):1155-1161 [PMID: 28012181]
  13. Dermatol Ther. 2022 Nov;35(11):e15846 [PMID: 36129212]
  14. Mol Ther. 2006 Jan;13(1):211-20 [PMID: 16126008]
  15. Dermatol Surg. 2019 May;45(5):711-717 [PMID: 30908361]
  16. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021 Feb;23(2):372-377 [PMID: 32617869]
  17. Mech Ageing Dev. 2021 Jul;197:111513 [PMID: 34044023]
  18. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jan;19(1):137-146 [PMID: 31603267]
  19. Acta Biomed. 2018 Oct 08;89(3):400-405 [PMID: 30333466]
  20. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2019 Nov-Dec;33(6 Suppl. 2):93-101. DENTAL SUPPLEMENT [PMID: 32425029]
  21. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2004;5(1):49-52 [PMID: 14979743]
  22. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022 Jan;15(1):E61-E65 [PMID: 35309276]
  23. Med Arch. 2015 Dec;69(6):414-6 [PMID: 26843737]
  24. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Feb;10(2):125-32 [PMID: 21283916]
  25. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Dec;17(6):1096-1100 [PMID: 29318715]
  26. Cell Transplant. 2018 May;27(5):729-738 [PMID: 29692196]
  27. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):1051-7 [PMID: 24161420]
  28. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Jun;18(3):798-805 [PMID: 31033162]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0peelskinTCAgrouppostmenopausalacidtreatmentsresultswomenfacialhydrationScalechemicalrandomisedclinicalnoveltrichloroaceticperformedexperimentalplacebo5%anti-agingtherapyEG=23CGsessionsparticipants-elasticitymeasuredusingratedAestheticImprovement3follow-upIntroduction:controlledtrialinvolvingstaffadministeringpersonsevaluatinginterventionstatisticalanalystblindedAim:assessefficacycontainingureaperoxidecoenzymeQ10kojic10%Materialmethods:Forty-sixmeanage6063±26yearsequallyrandomlydividedcontrolreceivedsolutionrespectivelyTreatmentweekly4consecutiveweeksrequiredapplypost-peelcreammorningeveningSkin-agingparameterssebumlevelsMC750B2Courage+KhazakaelectronicGmbHCologneGermanywrinkleappearanceassessedbasedphotographstakenFujifilmXT-1cameraWrinkleSeverityRatingaestheticimprovementPatient'sGlobalassessmentscarriedpre-post-interventionmonths1Results:Skinparticipants'satisfactiontreatmentpost-treatmentmonthgreaterConclusions:improvedsatisfyingTrialRegistrationno:ISRCTN41899475doiorg/101186/ISRCTN41899475women:studyrejuvenation

Similar Articles

Cited By