RETRACTION: Effect of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement on Transfusion and Postoperative Wound Complications in Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

No authors listed.

Abstract

RETRACTION: Y. Chen, W. Yu, Y. Jiang, J. Gao, D. Xie, J. Yu, W. Li, Z. Liu, and J. Xiong, "Effect of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement on Transfusion and Postoperative Wound Complications in Patients: A Meta-Analysis," International Wound Journal 21, no. 2 (2024): e14396, https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14396. The above article, published online on 23 September 2023, in Wiley Online Library (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/), has been retracted by agreement between the journal Editor in Chief, Professor Keith Harding; and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Following an investigation by the publisher, all parties have concluded that this article was accepted solely on the basis of a compromised peer review process. The editors have therefore decided to retract the article. The authors did not indicate their agreement with the retraction.

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0JWoundarticleRETRACTION:YWYuMinimallyInvasiveVersusConventionalAorticRootReplacementTransfusionPostoperativeComplicationsPatients:Meta-AnalysisWileyagreementChenJiangGaoDXieLiZLiuXiong"Effect"InternationalJournal2122024:e14396https://doiorg/101111/iwj14396publishedonline23September2023OnlineLibraryhttp://onlinelibrarywileycom/retractedjournalEditorChiefProfessorKeithHardingJohn&SonsLtdFollowinginvestigationpublisherpartiesconcludedacceptedsolelybasiscompromisedpeerreviewprocesseditorsthereforedecidedretractauthorsindicateretractionEffect

Similar Articles

Cited By