Preoperative diagnostic failure in gallbladder cancer: Influence of tumor location and size on imaging precision.

Miho Akabane, Jun Kawashima, Abdullah Altaf, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Federico Aucejo, Minoru Kitago, Yuki Imaoka, Andrea Ruzzenente, Itaru Endo, Hugo P Marques, Vincent Lam, Shishir K Maithel, Tom Hugh, Nazim Bhimani, Timothy M Pawlik
Author Information
  1. Miho Akabane: Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  2. Jun Kawashima: Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  3. Abdullah Altaf: Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  4. Selamawit Woldesenbet: Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
  5. Federico Aucejo: Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH, USA.
  6. Minoru Kitago: Department of Surgery, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
  7. Yuki Imaoka: Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  8. Andrea Ruzzenente: Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  9. Itaru Endo: Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
  10. Hugo P Marques: Department of Surgery, Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
  11. Vincent Lam: Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  12. Shishir K Maithel: Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  13. Tom Hugh: Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  14. Nazim Bhimani: Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  15. Timothy M Pawlik: Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Electronic address: Tim.Pawlik@osumc.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative imaging diagnosis of early-stage gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains challenging. The effectiveness of different imaging modalities and clinical factors to diagnose GBC have not been fully investigated. We identified risk factors for preoperative diagnostic failure of GBC, including tumor location (hepatic vs. peritoneal) and size relative to different imaging approaches.
METHODS: Patients undergoing curative-intent GBC resection (2000-2023) were identified from an international, multi-institutional database. The primary outcome was successful preoperative GBC diagnosis based solely on imaging without biopsy. Multivariable logistic regression identified risk factors associated with diagnostic failure, and the impact of different imaging modalities was assessed.
RESULTS: Among 293 patients, preoperative GBC diagnosis was successfully made in 164 (56.0 %) patients. Hepatic-sided tumors were less common among undiagnosed versus diagnosed patients (18.6 % vs. 44.5 %; p = 0.033). On multivariable analysis, hepatic-sided location (OR:0.13 [0.02-0.76]; p = 0.025, ref:peritoneal-sided) and tumor size ���2.0 cm (OR:0.11 [0.01-0.88]; p = 0.035) were associated with lower odds of preoperative imaging diagnostic failure. Among tumors <2.0 cm, peritoneal-sided lesions had a higher risk of diagnostic failure than hepatic-sided, with the risk gap widening as size decreased. MRI/MRCP (39.5 % vs. 65.2 %) and EUS (5.4 % vs. 16.5 %) were used less often among undiagnosed patients compared to diagnosed ones (both p < 0.001), while CT use was similar (84.5 % vs. 85.4 %; p = 0.993). The failure of preoperative imaging diagnosis decreased as more imaging modalities were combined compared with CT alone: 65.1 % for CT only versus 17.4 % for CT plus MRI/MRCP or EUS.
CONCLUSION: Peritoneal-sided tumors and lesions <2.0 cm were associated with higher preoperative diagnostic failure risk among patients with GBC, especially when a single imaging modality was utilized. Combining different imaging modalities may improve preoperative diagnosis among this subset of patients.

Keywords

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0imagingGBCpreoperativefailurediagnosticpatientsdiagnosisriskvsdifferentmodalitieslocationsizeamong5 %p = 0CTfactorsidentifiedtumorassociatedtumors0 cm4 %PreoperativegallbladderAmonglessundiagnosedversusdiagnosedhepatic-sidedOR:0[0<2lesionshigherdecreasedMRI/MRCP65EUScomparedBACKGROUND:early-stagecancerremainschallengingeffectivenessclinicaldiagnosefullyinvestigatedincludinghepaticperitonealrelativeapproachesMETHODS:Patientsundergoingcurative-intentresection2000-2023internationalmulti-institutionaldatabaseprimaryoutcomesuccessfulbasedsolelywithoutbiopsyMultivariablelogisticregressionimpactassessedRESULTS:293successfullymade164560 %Hepatic-sidedcommon186 %44033multivariableanalysis1302-076]025ref:peritoneal-sided���21101-088]035loweroddsperitoneal-sidedgapwidening392 %516usedoftenonesp < 0001usesimilar8485993combinedalone:1 %17plusCONCLUSION:Peritoneal-sidedespeciallysinglemodalityutilizedCombiningmayimprovesubsetcancer:InfluenceprecisionDiagnosisGallbladdercarcinomaImagingPeritonealSizeTumor

Similar Articles

Cited By