Comparison of the Predictive Value of Neutrophil Percentage-to-Albumin Ratio and Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for the Risk of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia Among Stroke Patients.

Zhu Tian, Yufeng Lin, Yang Song, Chi Zhang, Zhiyun Wang
Author Information
  1. Zhu Tian: Department of Neurology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, People's Republic of China.
  2. Yufeng Lin: Department of Neurology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, People's Republic of China.
  3. Yang Song: Department of Neurology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, People's Republic of China.
  4. Chi Zhang: Network and Information Office, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People's Republic of China.
  5. Zhiyun Wang: Department of Neurology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the predicting value of neutrophil percentage-to-Albumin ratio (NPAR) and modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) for Stroke-Associated Pneumonia (SAP) occurrence among Stroke patients.
Methods: We recruited Stroke patients (aged 18 years) hospitalized at Tianjin First Central Hospital from January 2022 to February 2023 for this retrospective cohort study. NPAR was categorized into four groups by considering the quartiles: Q1 (<1.38), Q2 (≥1.38 and <1.62), Q3 (≥1.62 and <1.87), Q4 (≥1.87). SAP incident was the primary outcome in this study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were employed to explore the association between NPAR, mGPS and SAP occurrence among individuals with Stroke. Besides, we compared the predicting value of NPAR and mGPS for SAP occurrence by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Results: Our study encompassed 851 patients with Stroke. One hundred and forty-seven patients (17.27%) developed SAP. After accounting for confounding factors, we observed significant positive association of high NPAR with SAP occurrence [(for the third quartile: odds ratio (OR)=2.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-5.47; for the fourth quartile: OR=3.35, 95% CI: 1.44-7.77)]. Additionally, the results also indicated that mGPS 1 (OR=2.26, 95% CI: 1.25-4.08) and mGPS 2 (OR=7.37, 95% CI: 2.63-20.70) were related to the increased probability of SAP, respectively. ROC analysis demonstrated that both the NPAR [area under the curve (AUC)=0.729, 95% CI: 0.687-0.771] and mGPS (AUC=0.671, 95% CI: 0.627-0.716) exhibited good predictive power for SAP occurrence. Based on the DeLong test, the predictive value of NPAR for SAP may be significantly superior to that of mGPS (<0.05).
Conclusion: Our findings suggest that both NPAR and mGPS serve as reliable biomarker for assessing SAP risk in Stroke patients, with NPAR demonstrating superior predictive value for SAP compared to mGPS.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancer. 2021 Jun 15;127(12):1974-1983 [PMID: 33760232]
  2. Front Immunol. 2023 Feb 13;14:1115031 [PMID: 36860868]
  3. Front Surg. 2023 Jan 09;9:1094973 [PMID: 36700011]
  4. Head Neck. 2023 Jul;45(7):1856-1867 [PMID: 37161915]
  5. J Transl Med. 2017 Feb 15;15(1):36 [PMID: 28202039]
  6. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018 Feb;18(2):134-147 [PMID: 28990587]
  7. Am Fam Physician. 2022 Jun 1;105(6):616-624 [PMID: 35704804]
  8. Front Neurol. 2021 May 13;12:671739 [PMID: 34054712]
  9. Stroke. 2015 Aug;46(8):2335-40 [PMID: 26111886]
  10. J Inflamm Res. 2023 Feb 18;16:691-700 [PMID: 36844255]
  11. Brain Behav. 2023 Dec;13(12):e3302 [PMID: 37938870]
  12. Dysphagia. 2020 Oct;35(5):735-744 [PMID: 31493069]
  13. Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23632 [PMID: 39384573]
  14. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2019 Aug 30;12:1756286419873264 [PMID: 31516557]
  15. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 10;24(2): [PMID: 36674837]
  16. Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 17;13(8): [PMID: 37626573]
  17. Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 08;12:705790 [PMID: 34566849]
  18. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2023 Jun 23;133(6): [PMID: 36633195]
  19. Nat Commun. 2020 May 19;11(1):2488 [PMID: 32427863]
  20. Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Sep 11;18:1477-1490 [PMID: 37720840]
  21. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):115 [PMID: 35300600]
  22. Stroke. 2018 Aug;49(8):1886-1892 [PMID: 29967014]
  23. Front Immunol. 2023 Jun 14;14:1173718 [PMID: 37388726]
  24. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Nov;18(11):1058-1066 [PMID: 31296369]
  25. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):746 [PMID: 39468499]
  26. Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Dec;511:81-89 [PMID: 33002476]
  27. Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 4;14(1):26646 [PMID: 39496695]
  28. Am J Infect Control. 2008 Jun;36(5):309-32 [PMID: 18538699]
  29. Cancer Cell Int. 2020 Sep 22;20:462 [PMID: 32982584]
  30. BMC Neurol. 2023 Aug 3;23(1):290 [PMID: 37537542]
  31. Front Immunol. 2023 Aug 09;14:1223464 [PMID: 37622119]
  32. Postgrad Med. 2023 Sep;135(7):681-689 [PMID: 37756038]
  33. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Feb 1;35(2):198-203 [PMID: 36472501]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SAPNPARmGPS95%valueoccurrencestrokepatientsCI:1predictivestudy<1≥1predictingratioGlasgowPrognosticScoreStroke-AssociatedPneumoniaamong386287associationcomparedROCcurvequartile:3520superiorObjective:assessneutrophilpercentage-to-albuminmodifiedMethods:recruitedaged18yearshospitalizedTianjinFirstCentralHospitalJanuary2022February2023retrospectivecohortcategorizedfourgroupsconsideringquartiles:Q1Q2Q3Q4incidentprimaryoutcomeUnivariatemultivariatelogisticregressionmodelsemployedexploreindividualsBesidesreceiveroperatingcharacteristicResults:encompassed851Onehundredforty-seven1727%developedaccountingconfoundingfactorsobservedsignificantpositivehigh[thirdoddsOR=2confidenceintervalCI:01-547fourthOR=344-777]AdditionallyresultsalsoindicatedOR=22625-408OR=73763-2070relatedincreasedprobabilityrespectivelyanalysisdemonstrated[areaAUC=0729687-0771]AUC=0671627-0716exhibitedgoodpowerBasedDeLongtestmaysignificantly<005Conclusion:findingssuggestservereliablebiomarkerassessingriskdemonstratingComparisonPredictiveValueNeutrophilPercentage-to-AlbuminRatioModifiedRiskAmongStrokePatientscomparison

Similar Articles

Cited By