Reduced field of view alters scanning behaviour.

E M J L Postuma, F W Cornelissen, M Pahlevan, J Heutink, G A de Haan
Author Information
  1. E M J L Postuma: Department Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. F W Cornelissen: Laboratory for Experimental Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  3. M Pahlevan: Department Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  4. J Heutink: Department Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. ORCID
  5. G A de Haan: Department Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. ORCID

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual reality environments presented through head mounted displays (HMDs) hold promise for training or studying mobility activities, such as cycling, walking, and street crossing. Yet, the limited field of view (FoV) of HMDs may influence scanning behaviour, reducing the translatability of findings to real-life situations. This study aims to (i) investigate how a reduced FoV influences scanning behaviour during mobility activities, and (ii) whether these alterations in scanning vary across these activities.
Method: Sixteen participants performed a real-life walking, cycling and street crossing activity twice; once with and once without a reduced FoV. A mobile eye-tracker with a built in gyroscope recorded scanning behaviour. Scanning behaviour was evaluated in terms of saccadic frequency and amplitude, horizontal head movement frequency and amplitude, and the horizontal and vertical eye position.
Results: The participants performed more horizontal head movements with larger amplitudes during the reduced FoV compared to the normal FoV. Additionally, they distributed their horizontal eye position more towards the central regions and less towards their peripheral regions. Overall, the range of both horizontal and vertical eye position decreased. The impact of the reduced FoV on horizontal head movement amplitude, horizontal eye position, and vertical eye position varied across activities.
Conclusion: Generally, individuals seem to compensate for a reduced FoV by making more horizontal head movements with large amplitudes, while reducing the eye position distribution. Consequently, caution is advised when translating outcomes on scanning behaviour observed in HMDs to those expected in real-life situations.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10055-025-01125-0.

Keywords

References

  1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023 Nov 1;64(14):26 [PMID: 37975848]
  2. Front Neurosci. 2021 May 24;15:656913 [PMID: 34108857]
  3. iScience. 2024 Feb 01;27(3):109076 [PMID: 38361615]
  4. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134459 [PMID: 26275160]
  5. Eye (Lond). 2015 Feb;29(2):196-9 [PMID: 25397783]
  6. ACM Trans Graph. 2023 Feb;42(1): [PMID: 37122317]
  7. J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Apr 05;12(1): [PMID: 33828721]
  8. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Aug 16;11:218 [PMID: 31474851]
  9. Sci Data. 2022 Aug 3;9(1):473 [PMID: 35922448]
  10. Sensors (Basel). 2016 Sep 09;16(9): [PMID: 27618056]
  11. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 9;11(12):e0166310 [PMID: 27935973]
  12. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 16;21(16): [PMID: 34450941]
  13. Accid Anal Prev. 2008 Jul;40(4):1394-400 [PMID: 18606271]
  14. Hum Factors. 2022 Nov;64(7):1210-1226 [PMID: 33529060]
  15. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 23;5:CD008388 [PMID: 31120142]
  16. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2020 May;26(5):1981-1990 [PMID: 32070971]
  17. Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106387 [PMID: 34492561]
  18. Exp Brain Res. 2008 Oct;190(4):369-87 [PMID: 18704387]
  19. Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Jan;82(1):18-26 [PMID: 15630400]
  20. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 28;11(6):e0157825 [PMID: 27351629]
  21. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Aug 09;13(1):68 [PMID: 27503112]
  22. Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8907 [PMID: 38632334]
  23. Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 24;4:996 [PMID: 24399993]
  24. Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;151:105943 [PMID: 33370601]
  25. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2021 Nov;27(11):4204-4214 [PMID: 34449388]
  26. Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:106004 [PMID: 33540347]
  27. Front Neurol. 2021 Jan 15;11:577713 [PMID: 33519665]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0horizontalFoVscanningbehavioureyepositionheadreducedactivitiesmovementsHMDsviewreal-lifeamplitudeverticalmounteddisplaysmobilitycyclingwalkingstreetcrossingfieldreducingsituationsacrossparticipantsperformedfrequencymovementamplitudestowardsregionsHeadIntroduction:VirtualrealityenvironmentspresentedholdpromisetrainingstudyingYetlimitedmayinfluencetranslatabilityfindingsstudyaimsinvestigateinfluencesiiwhetheralterationsvaryMethod:Sixteenactivitytwicewithoutmobileeye-trackerbuiltgyroscoperecordedScanningevaluatedtermssaccadicResults:largercomparednormalAdditionallydistributedcentrallessperipheralOverallrangedecreasedimpactvariedConclusion:GenerallyindividualsseemcompensatemakinglargedistributionConsequentlycautionadvisedtranslatingoutcomesobservedexpectedSupplementaryInformation:onlineversioncontainssupplementarymaterialavailable101007/s10055-025-01125-0ReducedaltersEyeFieldMobilityRehabilitation

Similar Articles

Cited By