The Tact is Being Emitted by the Child: Replicating and Extending Parity Research with English-Speaking, Typically Developing Children.

Samantha Bergmann, Tiffany Kodak
Author Information
  1. Samantha Bergmann: Department of Behavior Analysis, University of North Texas, 1155 Union Circle #311277, Denton, TX 76203 USA. ORCID
  2. Tiffany Kodak: Psychology Department, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI USA. ORCID

Abstract

Parity is one source of automatic reinforcement that increases the probability of verbal behavior that conforms to models provided by the verbal community. Parity as a conditioned reinforcer could explain the acquisition of grammar in the absence of direct, explicit reinforcement. This possibility has been explored in previous research on children's use of tacts with passive-voice autoclitic frames. In this study, we assessed the effects of modeling on the emission of passive-voice autoclitic frames using a pre- and post-test design with multiple training and testing phases. Thirteen children, aged 3 to 5 years, participated in the study and were randomly assigned to either a control, model-only, or model-plus-vocal-imitation group. None of the participants in the control group emitted tacts with passive-voice autoclitic frames. Eighty percent of the participants in the model-only and model-plus-vocal-imitation groups emitted passive-voice autoclitic frames, but the degree of change varied across participants. We measured whether participants attempted to echo the experimenter's passive-voice model in training, and participants in the model-only condition were much more likely to echo the model than participants in the model-plus-vocal-imitation group; nevertheless, participants in the model-plus-vocal-imitation group emitted more tacts with passive-voice autoclitic frames during testing phases. We discuss the results and mechanisms, including parity, which may account for these differences.

Keywords

References

  1. Anal Verbal Behav. 2006;22:153-69 [PMID: 22477353]
  2. J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1304-1315 [PMID: 32383188]
  3. Anal Verbal Behav. 2021 Jun 22;37(1):57-76 [PMID: 34395166]
  4. Behav Modif. 2019 Mar;43(2):288-306 [PMID: 29338313]
  5. Anal Verbal Behav. 2006;22:35-48 [PMID: 22477342]
  6. Anal Verbal Behav. 2016 Sep 12;32(2):96-106 [PMID: 30800619]
  7. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):289-90 [PMID: 16812795]
  8. Behav Anal Pract. 2017 Jan 17;10(4):395-401 [PMID: 29214135]
  9. Anal Verbal Behav. 1996;13:39-48 [PMID: 22477109]
  10. Anal Verbal Behav. 1998;15:3-16 [PMID: 22477124]
  11. J Child Lang. 1996 Feb;23(1):129-55 [PMID: 8733564]
  12. Anal Verbal Behav. 2012;28(1):73-82 [PMID: 22754105]
  13. Anal Verbal Behav. 2017 Nov 21;33(2):229-259 [PMID: 30854299]
  14. Anal Verbal Behav. 2018 Nov 21;35(1):74-84 [PMID: 31976222]
  15. Anal Verbal Behav. 2000;17:51-6 [PMID: 22477213]
  16. J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 Jan;65(1):185-241 [PMID: 16812780]
  17. Anal Verbal Behav. 1996;13:21-37 [PMID: 22477108]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0participantspassive-voiceautocliticframesParitymodel-plus-vocal-imitationgrouptactsmodel-onlyemittedreinforcementverbalbehaviorstudytrainingtestingphasescontrolechomodelonesourceautomaticincreasesprobabilityconformsmodelsprovidedcommunityconditionedreinforcerexplainacquisitiongrammarabsencedirectexplicitpossibilityexploredpreviousresearchchildren'suseassessedeffectsmodelingemissionusingpre-post-testdesignmultipleThirteenchildrenaged35yearsparticipatedrandomlyassignedeitherNoneEightypercentgroupsdegreechangevariedacrossmeasuredwhetherattemptedexperimenter'sconditionmuchlikelyneverthelessdiscussresultsmechanismsincludingparitymayaccountdifferencesTactEmittedChild:ReplicatingExtendingResearchEnglish-SpeakingTypicallyDevelopingChildrenAutocliticsGrammarPassivevoiceVerbal

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.