Science of Learning Strategy Series: Article 7, The Role of Context in Learning.

Thomas J Van Hoof, Megan A Sumeracki, Christopher R Madan
Author Information
  1. Thomas J Van Hoof: Dr. Van Hoof: Associate Professor, University of Connecticut School of Nursing, Storrs, and Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Storrs, CT; Dr. Sumeracki: Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Rhode Island College, Providence, RI; Dr. Madan: Assistant Professor, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The science of learning (learning science) is an interprofessional field that concerns itself with how the brain learns and remembers important information. Learning science has compiled a set of evidence-based strategies, such as distributed practice, retrieval practice, interleaving, and elaboration, which are quite relevant to continuing professional development (CPD). Spreading out study and practice separated by cognitive breaks (distributed practice), testing oneself to check mastery and memory of previously learned information (retrieval practice), mixing the learning of separate but associated information (interleaving), and making connections between concepts one is trying to learn and other known concepts (elaboration) represent strategies that are underused in CPD. Participants and planners alike can benefit from learning science recommendations to inform their decisions. Contextual learning, the subject of this article, is another evidence-based strategy that supports the study and practice of important information. By better understanding how the context in which one learns later affects retention and performance, CPD participants and planners can make more informed educational decisions.

References

  1. Kitto S. Opening up the CPD imagination. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2019;39:159���160.
  2. Green ML, Moeller JJ, Spak JM. Test-enhanced learning in health professions education: a systematic review: BEME Guide No. 48. Med Teach. 2018;40:337���350.
  3. Phillips JL, Heneka N, Bhattarai P, et al. Effectiveness of the spaced education pedagogy for clinicians' continuing professional development: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2019;53:886���902.
  4. Van Hoof TJ, Doyle TJ. Learning science as a potential new source of understanding and improvement for continuing education and continuing professional development. Med Teach. 2018;40:880���885.
  5. Weinstein Y, Madan CR, Sumeracki MA. Teaching the science of learning. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018;3:2���17.
  6. Dunlosky J, Rawson KA, Marsh EJ, et al. Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2013;14:4���58.
  7. Van Hoof TJ, Sumeracki MA, Madan CR. Science of learning strategy series: article 1, distributed practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2021;41:59���62.
  8. Van Hoof TJ, Madan CR, Sumeracki MA. Science of learning strategy series: article 2, retrieval practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2021;41:119���123.
  9. Van Hoof TJ, Sumeracki MA, Madan CR. Science of learning strategy series: article 3, interleaving. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022;42:265���268.
  10. Van Hoof TJ, Madan CR, Sumeracki MA. Science of learning strategy series: article 4, application to educational meetings. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2024;44:273���276.
  11. Van Hoof TJ, Madan CR, Sumeracki MA, et al. Science of learning strategy series: article 5, Incentivizing sleep in continuing professional development. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2024;44:277���281.
  12. Van Hoof TJ, Sumeracki MA, Madan CR, et al. Science of learning strategy series: article 6, elaboration. J Contin Educ Health Prof. In press.
  13. Smith SM, Vela E. Environmental context-dependent memory: a review and meta-analysis. Psychon Bull Rev. 2001;8:203���220.
  14. Tulving E, Thomson DM. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychol Rev. 1973;80:352���373.
  15. Smith SM. Background music and context-dependent memory. Am J Psychol. 1985;98:591���603.
  16. Faul L, LaBar KS. Mood-congruent memory revisited. Psychol Rev. 2023;130:1421���1456.
  17. Shams L, Seitz AR. Benefits of multisensory learning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2008;12:411���417.
  18. Godden DR, Baddeley AD. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br J Psychol. 1975;66:325���331.
  19. Finn GM, Patten D, McLachlan JC. The impact of wearing scrubs on contextual learning. Med Teach. 2010;32:381���384.
  20. Roediger HL, Tekin E, Uner O. Encoding-retrieval interactions. In: Byrne JH, ed. Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Academic Press; 2017:5���26.
  21. Doss MK, Picart JK, Gallo DA. The dark side of context: context reinstatement can distort memory. Psychol Sci. 2018;29:914���925.
  22. McCormick-Huhn JM, Bowman CR, Dennis NA. Repeated study of items with and without repeated context: aging effects on memory discriminability. Memory. 2018;26:603���609.
  23. Raaijmakers J. Spacing and repetition effects in human memory: application of the SAM model. Cogn Sci. 2003;27:431���452.
  24. Verkoeijen PP, Rikers RM, Schmidt HG. Detrimental influence of contextual change on spacing effects in free recall. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004;30:796���800.
  25. Whiffen JW, Karpicke JD. The role of episodic context in retrieval practice effects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017;43:1036���1046.
  26. Anderson JR, Bower GH. Interference in memory for multiple contexts. Mem Cogn. 1974;2:509���514.
  27. Madan CR, Spetch ML, Machado FM, et al. Encoding context determines risky choice. Psychol Sci. 2021;32:743���754.
  28. Guo D, Yang J. Interplay of the long axis of the hippocampus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex in schema���related memory retrieval. Hippocampus. 2020;30:263���277.
  29. Hermann A, Stark R, M��ller EA, et al. Multiple extinction contexts modulate the neural correlates of context-dependent extinction learning and retrieval. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020;168:107150.
  30. Lissek S, Glaubitz B, Schmidt-Wilcke T, et al. Hippocampal context processing during acquisition of a predictive learning task is associated with renewal in extinction recall. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016;28:747���762.
  31. Spalding KN, Jones SH, Duff MC, et al. Investigating the neural correlates of schemas: ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary for normal schematic influence on memory. J Neurosci. 2015;35:15746���15751.
  32. Szatkowska I, Szyma��ska O, Grabowska A. The role of the human ventromedial prefrontal cortex in memory for contextual information. Neurosci Lett. 2004;364:71���75.
  33. Boespflug A, Guerra J, Dalle S, et al. Enhancement of customary dermoscopy education with spaced education e-learning: a prospective controlled trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151:847���853.
  34. Ojha R, Liu A, Champion BL, et al. Spaced scenario demonstrations improve knowledge and confidence in pediatric acute illness management. Front Pediatr. 2014;2:133.
  35. Zimmerman D, Pilcher J. Implementing NICU critical thinking programs: one unit's experience. Neonatal Netw. 2008;27:231���238.
  36. Leamnson R. Thinking About Teaching and Learning: Developing Habits of Learning With First Year College and University Students. Sterling, VA: Stylus; 1999.

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0practicelearningscienceinformationLearningCPDlearnsimportantevidence-basedstrategiesdistributedretrievalinterleavingelaborationstudyconceptsoneplannerscandecisionsABSTRACT:interprofessionalfieldconcernsbrainrememberscompiledsetquiterelevantcontinuingprofessionaldevelopmentSpreadingseparatedcognitivebreakstestingoneselfcheckmasterymemorypreviouslylearnedmixingseparateassociatedmakingconnectionstryinglearnknownrepresentunderusedParticipantsalikebenefitrecommendationsinformContextualsubjectarticleanotherstrategysupportsbetterunderstandingcontextlateraffectsretentionperformanceparticipantsmakeinformededucationalScienceStrategySeries:Article7RoleContext

Similar Articles

Cited By