Xpert MTB/XDR Assay for Detection of Resistance to Isoniazid, Fluoroquinolone, Aminoglycoside, and Ethionamide Among Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis in Bangladesh.

S M Mazidur Rahman, Noshin Nawer Ruhee, Amiyo Haider, Md Jahid Hasan, Rumana Nasrin, Ahammad Shafiq Sikder Adel, Mohammad Khaja Mafij Uddin, Shahriar Ahmed, Aung Kya Jai Maug, Sayera Banu
Author Information
  1. S M Mazidur Rahman: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  2. Noshin Nawer Ruhee: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  3. Amiyo Haider: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  4. Md Jahid Hasan: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  5. Rumana Nasrin: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  6. Ahammad Shafiq Sikder Adel: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  7. Mohammad Khaja Mafij Uddin: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  8. Shahriar Ahmed: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  9. Aung Kya Jai Maug: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
  10. Sayera Banu: Program on Emerging Infections, Infectious Diseases Division, icddr,b, Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh. sbanu@icddrb.org. ORCID

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Early detection of drug resistance in patients with tuberculosis (TB) is crucial for prompt and effective treatment. This study evaluated the performance of Xpert MTB/XDR assay (Xpert XDR) for detecting resistance to isoniazid (INH), fluoroquinolones (FLQ), aminoglycosides (AMG), and ethionamide (ETH) in patients with pulmonary TB (PTB) in Bangladesh.
METHODS: Xpert XDR was performed on sputum samples from 793 Xpert MTB/RIF positive patients with PTB enrolled between April 2021 and March 2023. Results were compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility test (pDST) performed on Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) media for the detection of resistance to INH, FLQ, AMG, and ETH. The performance of the assay was also compared between newly diagnosed or rifampicin (RIF)-sensitive versus re-treated or RIF-resistant patients with PTB.
RESULTS: Of 793 samples tested by Xpert XDR, indeterminate results for INH, FLQ, AMG, and ETH were observed for 3 (0.4%), 5 (0.6%), 33 (4.2%), and 0 (0%) isolates, respectively. The assay's sensitivity and specificity compared to pDST was 94.0% (95% CI 90.5-96.4; 264/281) and 97.3% (95% CI 95.4-98.5; 495/509), respectively for INH; 86.0% (95% CI 78.2-91.8; 98/114) and 99.3% (95% CI 98.3-99.3; 669/674), respectively for FLQ; 85.7% (95% CI 42.1-99.6; 6/7) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.3-100.0; 752/753), respectively for AMG; and 25.0% (95% CI 19.0-31.7; 48/192) and 96.7% (95% CI 94.9-98.0; 581/601), respectively for ETH. Agreement of Xpert XDR with pDST was almost perfect for detecting resistance to INH, FLQ, and AMG (kappa: 0.91, 0.89, and 0.86, respectively), but fair for ETH (kappa: 0.28). Xpert XDR performed significantly better among re-treated or RIF-resistant patients with TB compared to newly diagnosed or RIF-sensitive cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the high performance, Xpert XDR assay can be programmatically implemented nationwide for rapid and accurate detection of resistance to INH, FLQ, and AMG in patients with PTB, aiding clinicians in selecting appropriate regimens for the treatment of drug-resistant TB.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Jul 29;13:352 [PMID: 23895665]
  2. J Clin Microbiol. 2024 Aug 14;62(8):e0022924 [PMID: 39058018]
  3. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2025 Feb;31(2):220-225 [PMID: 39374650]
  4. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;22(2):242-249 [PMID: 34627496]
  5. Infection. 2024 Dec;52(6):2207-2212 [PMID: 38709461]
  6. J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Feb 18;59(3): [PMID: 33298611]
  7. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1963 May;87:775-9 [PMID: 13927224]
  8. Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Apr 12;17:1491-1506 [PMID: 38628245]
  9. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017 Jan 1;21(1):12-17 [PMID: 28157459]
  10. J Clin Microbiol. 2023 Jun 20;61(6):e0183222 [PMID: 37249422]
  11. Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Mar 6;:e0276122 [PMID: 36877052]
  12. J Clin Microbiol. 2010 Jan;48(1):229-37 [PMID: 19864480]
  13. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Sep;69(9):2369-75 [PMID: 24855126]
  14. J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Jan;52(1):156-63 [PMID: 24172155]
  15. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Jan;55(1):355-60 [PMID: 20974869]
  16. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Mar 25;60(4):2090-6 [PMID: 26787695]
  17. Bull World Health Organ. 1969;41(1):21-43 [PMID: 5309084]
  18. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 05;12(2): [PMID: 35204501]
  19. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Aug;53(8):3181-9 [PMID: 19451293]
  20. PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0284545 [PMID: 37590288]
  21. J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Nov;43(11):5477-82 [PMID: 16272473]
  22. mBio. 2017 Aug 29;8(4): [PMID: 28851844]
  23. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2006 Jan;30(1):36-52 [PMID: 16438679]
  24. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Dec;70(12):3214-21 [PMID: 26311839]
  25. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0120470 [PMID: 25816236]
  26. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014 Apr;353(1):40-8 [PMID: 24822277]
  27. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 18;5:CD014841 [PMID: 35583175]
  28. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 19;8(1):3246 [PMID: 29459669]
  29. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 23;10(3):e0119628 [PMID: 25799046]
  30. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 [PMID: 843571]
  31. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2016 Aug;20(8):1105-12 [PMID: 27393547]
  32. Indian J Med Res. 2015 Nov;142(5):512-4 [PMID: 26658583]

Grants

  1. 72038820CA00002/United States Agency for International Development

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0Xpert095%CIresistanceXDRINHFLQAMGrespectivelypatients withETHTBperformancePTBcompared0%detectionMTB/XDRassayBangladeshperformedpDST99drugtreatmentdetectingsamples793newlydiagnosedre-treatedRIF-resistant354943%867%kappa:TuberculosisINTRODUCTION:EarlytuberculosiscrucialprompteffectivestudyevaluatedisoniazidfluoroquinolonesaminoglycosidesethionamidepatientspulmonaryMETHODS:sputumMTB/RIFpositiveenrolledApril2021March2023ResultsphenotypicsusceptibilitytestLowenstein-JensenL-JmediaalsorifampicinRIF-sensitiveversusRESULTS:testedindeterminateresultsobserved4%6%332%isolatesassay'ssensitivityspecificity905-96264/28197CI 954-98495/509782-91898/114983-99669/67485421-9966/79%3-100752/75325190-31748/192969-98581/601Agreementalmostperfect9189fair28significantlybetteramongRIF-sensitivecasesCONCLUSIONS:Givenhighcanprogrammaticallyimplementednationwiderapidaccurateaidingcliniciansselectingappropriateregimensdrug-resistantAssayDetectionResistanceIsoniazidFluoroquinoloneAminoglycosideEthionamideAmongPatientsPulmonaryDiagnosticDrug

Similar Articles

Cited By