Implementation of a Multicancer Detection (MCD) Test in a Tertiary Referral Center in Asymptomatic Patients: An 18-Month Prospective Cohort Study.

Ryan T Hurt, Aditya K Ghosh, Brian M Dougan, Elizabeth A Gilman, Bradley R Salonen, Jay Adusumalli, Sara L Bonnes, Carl A Andersen, Amirala S Pasha, Sanjeev Nanda, Erin M Pagel, Christina D Verness, Steven D Crowley, Steven W Ressler, Jewel J Samadder, Richard J Presutti, Aadel A Chaudhuri, William Sanchez, Ivana T Croghan, Christopher R Stephenson, Karthik Ghosh
Author Information
  1. Ryan T Hurt: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  2. Aditya K Ghosh: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  3. Brian M Dougan: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  4. Elizabeth A Gilman: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. ORCID
  5. Bradley R Salonen: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  6. Jay Adusumalli: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  7. Sara L Bonnes: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  8. Carl A Andersen: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  9. Amirala S Pasha: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. ORCID
  10. Sanjeev Nanda: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  11. Erin M Pagel: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. ORCID
  12. Christina D Verness: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  13. Steven D Crowley: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  14. Steven W Ressler: Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
  15. Jewel J Samadder: Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
  16. Richard J Presutti: Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA. ORCID
  17. Aadel A Chaudhuri: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  18. William Sanchez: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. ORCID
  19. Ivana T Croghan: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. ORCID
  20. Christopher R Stephenson: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  21. Karthik Ghosh: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Multicancer Detection (MCD) tests, such as the GRAIL Galleri, offer a novel approach to cancer screening by detecting cancer-specific methylation patterns in cell-free DNA through a single blood sample. This study evaluated an 18-month implementation of MCD testing in a tertiary ambulatory internal medicine clinic.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2022 and November 2023, 2244 asymptomatic (without symptoms attributed to cancer) patients underwent MCD testing. The study focused on operational workflows, patient and physician education, and diagnostic follow-up of positive results. Standardized materials, including electronic health record (EHR) workflows, FAQs, and diagnostic pathways, were developed to facilitate implementation. Challenges included managing false positives, patient anxiety, costs, and ethical considerations.
RESULTS: Of the 2244 patients tested, 17 (0.76%) had positive results, and 15 underwent further diagnostic evaluation. Cancer was confirmed in 11 (73.3%) patients, including cases of breast, colon, esophageal, lymphoma, ovarian, and pancreatic cancers. Four patients had no identifiable malignancy despite comprehensive work-up.
CONCLUSIONS: MCD testing is feasible in routine clinical workflows, with 73% of positive cases yielding cancer diagnoses. While promising, further research is required to assess long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and optimal implementation strategies of cancer interception in broader healthcare settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;13(14): [PMID: 34298717]
  2. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2024 Sep 2;8(5): [PMID: 39270066]
  3. Science. 2018 Feb 23;359(6378):926-930 [PMID: 29348365]
  4. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Oct 01;14(19): [PMID: 36230741]
  5. Gut. 2024 Mar 7;73(4):639-648 [PMID: 38123998]
  6. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 May;29(5):895-902 [PMID: 32229577]
  7. Cancer Med. 2024 Aug;13(15):e70040 [PMID: 39118261]
  8. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024 Jun 10;:OF1-OF5 [PMID: 38853442]
  9. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2024 Aug 23;22:eAO0771 [PMID: 39194069]
  10. J Med Screen. 2024 Sep;31(3):140-149 [PMID: 38304990]
  11. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Feb;137:107426 [PMID: 38160749]
  12. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Jan;26(1):43-51 [PMID: 26588231]
  13. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Nov 15;27(22):6135-6144 [PMID: 34465601]
  14. Ann Oncol. 2023 May;34(5):486-495 [PMID: 36849097]
  15. Lancet. 2023 Oct 7;402(10409):1251-1260 [PMID: 37805216]
  16. Tumori. 2023 Jun;109(3):335-341 [PMID: 36316952]
  17. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jun;31(6):745-759 [PMID: 33506766]
  18. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jun 3;33(6):830-837 [PMID: 38506751]
  19. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 1;22(17):4322-7 [PMID: 27220959]
  20. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Mar;30(3):460-468 [PMID: 33328254]
  21. Am J Med. 2022 Jul;135(7):e145-e149 [PMID: 35367445]
  22. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Jul;24(7):733-743 [PMID: 37352875]
  23. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024 Aug 1;17(8):349-353 [PMID: 38819783]
  24. Cancer. 2022 Dec 15;128(24):4251-4284 [PMID: 36301149]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Prospective Studies
Male
Neoplasms
Middle Aged
Tertiary Care Centers
Early Detection of Cancer
Aged
Adult
Asymptomatic Diseases

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MCDcancertestingpatientsdiagnosticimplementationworkflowspositiveMulticancerDetectiontestsGRAILGalleriscreeningstudy2244underwentpatientresultsincludingcasesinterceptionOBJECTIVE:offernovelapproachdetectingcancer-specificmethylationpatternscell-freeDNAsinglebloodsampleevaluated18-monthtertiaryambulatoryinternalmedicineclinicPATIENTSANDMETHODS:June2022November2023asymptomaticwithoutsymptomsattributedfocusedoperationalphysicianeducationfollow-upStandardizedmaterialselectronichealthrecordEHRFAQspathwaysdevelopedfacilitateChallengesincludedmanagingfalsepositivesanxietycostsethicalconsiderationsRESULTS:tested17076%15evaluationCancerconfirmed11733%breastcolonesophageallymphomaovarianpancreaticcancersFouridentifiablemalignancydespitecomprehensivework-upCONCLUSIONS:feasibleroutineclinical73%yieldingdiagnosespromisingresearchrequiredassesslong-termoutcomescost-effectivenessoptimalstrategiesbroaderhealthcaresettingsImplementationTestTertiaryReferralCenterAsymptomaticPatients:18-MonthProspectiveCohortStudyearlymulticancerdetection

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.