General Practitioners' Needs and Preferences Regarding the Provision of Self-sampling Tests for Cervical Cancer Screening in Flanders, Belgium.

Eva Gezels, Sara Willems, Katrien Vanthomme, Lien Keersse, Kaatje Van Roy
Author Information
  1. Eva Gezels: Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. ORCID
  2. Sara Willems: Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  3. Katrien Vanthomme: Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  4. Lien Keersse: Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  5. Kaatje Van Roy: Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening coverage for cervical cancer remains suboptimal in Flanders, Belgium. The upcoming transition to primary HPV screening in January 2025 presents an opportunity to offer self-sampling kits (SSKs) as an alternative to conventional Pap smears, with the potential to increase participation rates. General practitioners (GPs) can play a crucial role in reaching under-screened populations. Hereto it is essential to understand the needs and preferences of GPs regarding the integration of SSKs into their routine practice.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with GPs participating in an implementation study on the added value of SSKs for long-term non-screened women, focusing on their experiences, challenges, and suggestions regarding the provision of SSKs to these patients.
RESULTS: The interviewed GPs recognized the potential of SSKs to increase participation, particularly due to their less invasive nature, which makes them more acceptable to underscreened women. Time constraints, technical software challenges, limited knowledge and doubt about SSK accuracy were identified as key barriers to implement SSKs in routine practice. GPs emphasized the need for adaptability in the distribution methods of SSKs, with many preferring a combination of mailing the SSKs and providing them in person. Personalized communication and tailored explanations were considered as crucial to ensure patient acceptance and the correct use of the tests.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that while GPs recognize the potential of SSKs to enhance cervical cancer screening, several challenges need to be addressed for their effective integration into primary care. A successful approach should incorporate streamlined support systems, tailored approaches to implement reminders for GPs and improved education for GPs. Future research should consider quantitative data on the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of SSKs in the specific context of Flanders and the perspectives of a broader range of stakeholders, including patients, practice nurses, gynecologists and policymakers, to develop more comprehensive strategies for the successful implementation of SSKs.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 09;6:77 [PMID: 29686981]
  2. HRB Open Res. 2021 May 5;4:44 [PMID: 34458677]
  3. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jun;26(6):609-615 [PMID: 28332888]
  4. Br J Cancer. 2023 Mar;128(5):805-813 [PMID: 36517552]
  5. Int J Public Health. 2018 Jan;63(1):93-103 [PMID: 29063122]
  6. Psychol Health. 2022 Mar;37(3):279-330 [PMID: 34121540]
  7. J Med Screen. 2017 Sep;24(3):127-145 [PMID: 27754937]
  8. BMJ. 2018 Dec 5;363:k4823 [PMID: 30518635]
  9. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Oct;110:103684 [PMID: 32702568]
  10. Eur J Cancer. 2009 Oct;45(15):2640-8 [PMID: 19695864]
  11. Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jan 06;38:102599 [PMID: 38292027]
  12. Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 26;12(17): [PMID: 39273727]
  13. Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Feb;93(1):56-61 [PMID: 28100761]
  14. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Dec 13;3(1):130 [PMID: 36514133]
  15. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2024 Feb 12;25:e12 [PMID: 38345096]
  16. Arch Public Health. 2021 Aug 30;79(1):155 [PMID: 34462004]
  17. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022 Sep;40(3):385-394 [PMID: 36314584]
  18. BMC Womens Health. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):112 [PMID: 31477083]
  19. Int J Equity Health. 2021 Sep 24;20(1):211 [PMID: 34560888]
  20. BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 14;12(11):e062823 [PMID: 36375978]
  21. Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 4;8(1):257 [PMID: 31685010]
  22. Int J Cancer. 2020 Aug 1;147(3):887-896 [PMID: 31837006]
  23. J Prim Health Care. 2023 Jun;15(2):147-154 [PMID: 37390037]
  24. Int J Cancer. 2023 Jul 1;153(1):8-19 [PMID: 36385698]
  25. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):415-422 [PMID: 30289317]
  26. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 May;6(5): [PMID: 34011537]
  27. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83 [PMID: 24433684]
  28. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2023 Apr 27;24:e31 [PMID: 37185205]
  29. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Sep;144:107617 [PMID: 38977179]
  30. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 26;15(21): [PMID: 37958337]
  31. Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):524-32 [PMID: 24192252]
  32. Vaccine. 2012 Nov 20;30 Suppl 5:F88-99 [PMID: 23199969]
  33. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 06;18(14): [PMID: 34299698]
  34. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022 Dec;46(6):858-864 [PMID: 35735902]

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Belgium
Early Detection of Cancer
General Practitioners
Middle Aged
Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Papillomavirus Infections
Specimen Handling
Vaginal Smears
Interviews as Topic
Self Care
Papanicolaou Test
Male

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SSKsGPscancerFlandersprimarypotentialpracticechallengesScreeningcervicalBelgiumscreeningself-samplingincreaseparticipationGeneralpractitionerscrucialregardingintegrationroutineimplementationstudywomenpatientsimplementneedtailoredcaresuccessfulresearchBACKGROUND:coverageremainssuboptimalupcomingtransitionHPVJanuary2025presentsopportunityofferkitsalternativeconventionalPapsmearsratescanplayrolereachingunder-screenedpopulationsHeretoessentialunderstandneedspreferencesMETHODS:Semi-structuredinterviewsconductedparticipatingaddedvaluelong-termnon-screenedfocusingexperiencessuggestionsprovisionRESULTS:interviewedrecognizedparticularlyduelessinvasivenaturemakesacceptableunderscreenedTimeconstraintstechnicalsoftwarelimitedknowledgedoubtSSKaccuracyidentifiedkeybarriersemphasizedadaptabilitydistributionmethodsmanypreferringcombinationmailingprovidingpersonPersonalizedcommunicationexplanationsconsideredensurepatientacceptancecorrectusetestsCONCLUSION:showsrecognizeenhanceseveraladdressedeffectiveapproachincorporatestreamlinedsupportsystemsapproachesremindersimprovededucationFutureconsiderquantitativedataeffectivenesscost-efficiencyspecificcontextperspectivesbroaderrangestakeholdersincludingnursesgynecologistspolicymakersdevelopcomprehensivestrategiesPractitioners'NeedsPreferencesRegardingProvisionSelf-samplingTestsCervicalCancerearlydetectiongeneralhealthqualitativedevice

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.