Availability of Women's Health Clinics, Primary Care Providers, and Women Veterans' Ratings of Care Experiences.

Danielle E Rose, Melissa M Farmer, Sabine M Oishi, Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry, Ismelda Canelo, Donna L Washington, Elizabeth M Yano
Author Information
  1. Danielle E Rose: VA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Danielle.Rose@va.gov. ORCID
  2. Melissa M Farmer: VA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  3. Sabine M Oishi: VA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  4. Bevanne A Bean-Mayberry: VA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  5. Ismelda Canelo: VA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  6. Donna L Washington: VA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  7. Elizabeth M Yano: VA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation & Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: VA strives to improve women Veterans' access to comprehensive care. We assessed if availability of specialized clinic arrangements for women or specialized providers (women's health primary care providers) was associated with women Veterans' ratings of primary care experiences.
DESIGN: Cross sectional.
PARTICIPANTS: We linked patient-level survey data (Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients, FY 2017, n=4264) with primary care clinic-level data (Clinical Practice Organizational Survey, primary care module, 2017-2018, n=126) from clinics with ���300 women Veterans.
MAIN MEASURES: Our dependent variables were derived from top ratings for items rating access, care coordination, comprehensiveness (behavioral health assessed), provider communication, and primary care provider. Our variables of interest were the availability of specialized clinic arrangements such as women's health clinics and specialized providers such as women's health primary care providers.
STATISTICAL ANALYSES: We conducted multi-level, multivariate logistic regression predicting women Veterans' optimal ratings of care, controlling for patient-, clinic-, and area-level characteristics.
KEY RESULTS: Women Veterans receiving care at general primary care clinics with no women's health primary care providers had a lower likelihood of rating provider communication as optimal (Adjusted Odds Ratio .60, 95%CI .45-.78) or rating the primary care provider as 9 or 10/10 (Adjusted Odds Ratio .61, 95%CI .42-.86). Women Veterans receiving care at VA sites with a gynecology clinic had a higher likelihood of rating access as optimal (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.40, 95%CI 1.01-1.94).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that availability of women's health primary care providers in general primary care and availability of gynecology clinics were associated with higher likelihood of women Veterans rating care experiences as optimal. Almost all VA sites have women's health primary care providers available, increasing availability at every site remains an important goal. Relatively few VA community-based outpatient clinics offer gynecology clinics, offering opportunities for improved care experiences among women Veterans.

Keywords

References

  1. Yano EM. A partnered research initiative to accelerate implementation of comprehensive care for women veterans: the VA women���s health CREATE. Med Care, 2015. 53(4 Suppl 1): p. S10-4. [PMID: 25767962]
  2. Frayne SM et al. Sourcebook: Women veterans in the Veterans Health Administration. Volume 4: Longitudinal trends in sociodemographics, utilization, health profile, and geographic distribution. Women���s Health Evaluation Initiative, Women���s Health Services, Veterans Health Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington DC, 2018;2.
  3. Yano EM et al. The organization and delivery of women���s health care in Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Womens Health Issues, 2003. 13(2): p. 55-61. [PMID: 12732441]
  4. Bean-Mayberry BA et al. Organizational characteristics associated with the availability of women���s health clinics for primary care in the Veterans Health Administration. Mil Med, 2007. 172(8): p. 824-8. [PMID: 17803073]
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHA Directive 1330.01(7). 2023, Veterans Health Administration: Washington, DC 20420.
  6. Washington DL et al. Tailoring VA primary care to women veterans: association with patient-rated quality and satisfaction. Womens Health Issues, 2011. 21(4 Suppl): p. S112-9. [PMID: 21724130]
  7. Washington DL et al. To use or not to use. What influences why women veterans choose VA health care. J Gen Intern Med, 2006. 21 Suppl 3(Suppl 3): p. S11-8.
  8. Washington DL et al. Women veterans��� healthcare delivery preferences and use by military service era: findings from the National Survey of Women Veterans. J Gen Intern Med, 2013. 28 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): p. S571-6.
  9. Spelman JF et al. Post deployment care for returning combat veterans. J Gen Intern Med, 2012. 27(9): p. 1200-9. [PMID: 22648608]
  10. Noel PH et al. A pilot survey of post-deployment health care needs in small community-based primary care clinics. BMC Fam Pract, 2011. 12: p. 79. [PMID: 21801356]
  11. Seelig MD et al. Availability of gynecologic services in the department of veterans affairs. Womens Health Issues, 2008. 18(3): p. 167-73. [PMID: 18329895]
  12. Friedman S et al. Gynecologist Supply Deserts Across the VA and in the Community. J Gen Intern Med, 2022. 37(Suppl 3): p. 690-697. [PMID: 36042097]
  13. Katon J et al. VA location and structural factors associated with on-site availability of reproductive health services. J Gen Intern Med, 2013. 28 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): p. S591-7.
  14. Baier Manwell L et al. Mini-residencies to improve care for women veterans: a decade of re-educating Veterans Health Administration primary care providers. J Women���s Health, 2022. 31(7): p. 991-1002. [PMID: 35049359]
  15. Bastian LA et al. Association between women veterans��� experiences with VA outpatient health care and designation as a women���s health provider in primary care clinics. Womens Health Issues, 2014. 24(6): p. 605-12. [PMID: 25442706]
  16. Trentalange M et al. Patient Perception of Enough Time Spent With Provider Is a Mechanism for Improving Women Veterans��� Experiences With VA Outpatient Health Care. Eval Health Prof, 2016. 39(4): p. 460-474. [PMID: 26908572]
  17. Bean-Mayberry B et al. Associations between provider designation and female-specific cancer screening in women Veterans. Med Care, 2015. 53(4 Suppl 1): p. S47-54. [PMID: 25767975]
  18. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring: the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. 1980: Health Administration Press.
  19. Yabroff KR. et al. Systems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practice. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2011. 20(12): p. 2471-9. [PMID: 21976292]
  20. Taplin SH, Yabroff KR, Zapka J. A multilevel research perspective on cancer care delivery: the example of follow-up to an abnormal mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2012. 21(10): p. 1709-15. [PMID: 22911332]
  21. Zapka J et al. Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2010. 2010(40): p. 58-71. [PMID: 20386054]
  22. Office of Performance Management, Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) Primer Version 2. 2021, Department of Veterans Affairs, VHA Office of Quality and Patient Safety: Washington, DC. p. 5.
  23. Office of Performance Management, Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) Handbook. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHA Office of Quality and Patient Safety: Washington, DC. p. 32.
  24. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The CAHPS Program. April 2023; Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/cahps-program/index.html .
  25. Quigley DD et al. Practice leaders report targeting several types of changes in care experienced by patients during patient-centered medical home transformation. J Patient Exp, 2020. 7(6): p. 1509-1518. [PMID: 33457608]
  26. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. CAHPS Bibliography. 2024; Available from: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/bibliography/index.html . Accessed January 24, 2025.
  27. Veterans Health Administration, Journey of the Survey. 2020.
  28. Center for Strategic Analytics and Reporting (CSAR), The Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning (SAIL) Value Model. 2023.
  29. Area Health Resource Files, H.R.S.A. Bureau of Health Workforce, Department of Health and Human Services, Editor. 2017.
  30. Health Resources and Services Administration. About the Data. 2024 04/04/2024]; Available from: https://data.hrsa.gov/data/about .
  31. Cordasco KM et al. Health and Health Care Access of Rural Women Veterans: Findings From the National Survey of Women Veterans. J Rural Health, 2016. 32(4): p. 397-406. [PMID: 27466970]
  32. Statacorp, Stata. 2023, StataCorp LLC: College Station, TX.
  33. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA, 1988. 260(12): p. 1743-8.
  34. deKleijn M et al. Creating a roadmap for delivering gender-sensitive comprehensive care for women Veterans: results of a national expert panel. Med Care, 2015. 53(4 Suppl 1): p. S156-64. [PMID: 25767971]
  35. Hamilton AB et al. Factors related to attrition from VA healthcare use: findings from the National Survey of Women Veterans. J Gen Intern Med, 2013. 28 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): p. S510-6.
  36. Klap R et al. Prevalence of stranger harassment of women veterans at veterans affairs medical centers and impacts on delayed and missed care. Womens Health Issues, 2019. 29(2): p. 107-115. [PMID: 30686577]
  37. Apaydin EA et al. Differences in burnout and intent to leave between women���s health and general primary care providers in the veterans health administration. J Gen Intern Med, 2022. 37(10): p. 2382-2389. [PMID: 34618305]
  38. Schwartz R et al. Retaining VA Women���s health primary care providers: work setting matters. J Gen Intern Med, 2021. 36(3): p. 614-621. [PMID: 33063204]

Grants

  1. CRE 12_038/U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  2. RCS 05-195/U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0careprimaryhealthproviderswomenwomen'sclinicsVeteransavailabilityratingVAVeterans'specializedclinicprovideroptimalaccessratingsexperiencesWomenlikelihoodAdjusted95%CIgynecologyassessedarrangementsassociateddataSurveyExperiencesvariablescommunicationreceivinggeneralOddsRatiositeshigher1Carewomen���sBACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:strivesimprovecomprehensiveDESIGN:CrosssectionalPARTICIPANTS:linkedpatient-levelsurveyHealthcarePatientsFY2017n=4264clinic-levelClinicalPracticeOrganizationalmodule2017-2018n=126���300MAINMEASURES:dependentderivedtopitemscoordinationcomprehensivenessbehavioralinterestSTATISTICALANALYSES:conductedmulti-levelmultivariatelogisticregressionpredictingcontrollingpatient-clinic-area-levelcharacteristicsKEYRESULTS:lower6045-78910/10Odds Ratio6142-864001-194CONCLUSIONS:studyfoundAlmostavailableincreasingeverysiteremainsimportantgoalRelativelycommunity-basedoutpatientofferofferingopportunitiesimprovedamongAvailabilityWomen'sHealthClinicsPrimaryProvidersRatingspatientsatisfaction

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.