Pulse and legume consumption is associated with a more optimal nutrient intake and a higher EAT-Lancet index in a representative UK population.

Yankho Kaimila, Oyinkansola A Olotu, Miriam E Clegg, Kim G Jackson, Julie A Lovegrove
Author Information
  1. Yankho Kaimila: Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, University of Reading, Harry Nursten Building, Pepper Lane, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK. ORCID
  2. Oyinkansola A Olotu: Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, University of Reading, Harry Nursten Building, Pepper Lane, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK. ORCID
  3. Miriam E Clegg: Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, University of Reading, Harry Nursten Building, Pepper Lane, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK. ORCID
  4. Kim G Jackson: Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, University of Reading, Harry Nursten Building, Pepper Lane, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK. ORCID
  5. Julie A Lovegrove: Hugh Sinclair Unit of Human Nutrition, University of Reading, Harry Nursten Building, Pepper Lane, Reading, RG6 6DZ, UK. j.a.lovegrove@reading.ac.uk. ORCID

Abstract

PURPOSE: Diets high in pulses and legumes have been associated with improved cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers but the relationship is less well studied in UK populations. To address this, associations between consumption of pulses (dried beans, peas and lentils) and legumes (pulses, fresh peas and green beans) with nutrient intake and status, a sustainable diet quality score (EAT-Lancet index), CVD risk markers and food expenditure was assessed in representative UK populations.
METHODS: A secondary analysis of data from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008-2019) and the Living Costs and Food Survey (2001-2022) was conducted. To assess the relationships, regression models controlling for covariates were used.
RESULTS: Children and adults consumed mean ± SD 10.6 ± 27.0 g/day and 15.0 ± 21.0 g/day of pulses, and 16.7 ± 32.5 g/day and 27.3 ± 26.0 g/day of legumes, respectively. Diets rich in pulses and legumes were associated with higher intakes of energy, fibre, vitamin E, thiamine, folate, biotin, sodium, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, zinc, and manganese; lower intakes of saturated fats, total and free sugars and higher plasma selenium and total carotenoid concentrations (all P < 0.05). Consumption of a portion (80 g) of pulses and legumes was associated with a 3.7 point increase in EAT-Lancet index (P < 0.001). Average expenditure on pulses and legumes/person/week in 2022 was £1.68 and £2.90, equivalent to 0.33% and 0.56% of weekly income respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulse and legume-rich diets are broadly associated with a more optimum nutrient intake, higher micronutrient status and a more sustainable diet. Strategies are needed to increase pulse and legume consumption in UK populations.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Mar 1;107(3):436-444 [PMID: 29566200]
  2. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 May;109(5):909-13 [PMID: 19394480]
  3. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Mar;117(3):477-489 [PMID: 36811474]
  4. J Food Sci Technol. 2017 Mar;54(4):853-857 [PMID: 28303036]
  5. Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):213-214 [PMID: 31235280]
  6. Eur J Nutr. 2023 Mar;62(2):807-817 [PMID: 36266476]
  7. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Jun;31(6):1461-1462 [PMID: 37203335]
  8. Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Feb;83(2):100-8 [PMID: 15744402]
  9. Front Nutr. 2018 Jul 19;5:55 [PMID: 30073167]
  10. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Aug 10;9:475-483 [PMID: 28848355]
  11. Eur J Nutr. 2021 Sep;60(6):3107-3118 [PMID: 33515322]
  12. Nutrients. 2019 Aug 21;11(9): [PMID: 31438636]
  13. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2018 Oct;28(7):437-441 [PMID: 29496410]
  14. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004 Feb;58(2):363-75 [PMID: 14749759]
  15. Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Aug 10;51(4):e143-e155 [PMID: 35640141]
  16. Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Mar 4;115(3):705-716 [PMID: 34791011]
  17. Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492 [PMID: 30660336]
  18. Nutr Bull. 2023 Mar;48(1):134-143 [PMID: 36649740]
  19. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1994 Sep;3(6):493-500 [PMID: 8000300]
  20. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 19;5:CD011737 [PMID: 32428300]
  21. Can J Diabetes. 2016 Aug;40(4):355-63 [PMID: 27497151]
  22. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 1:S27-36 [PMID: 22916812]
  23. Br J Nutr. 2021 Jul 14;126(1):92-100 [PMID: 32993824]
  24. Nutrients. 2022 Aug 16;14(16): [PMID: 36014869]
  25. Br J Nutr. 2002 Dec;88 Suppl 3:S263-71 [PMID: 12498626]

Grants

  1. BB/W017946/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

MeSH Term

Humans
Fabaceae
United Kingdom
Male
Female
Adult
Child
Middle Aged
Nutrition Surveys
Adolescent
Young Adult
Diet
Cardiovascular Diseases
Aged
Nutritional Status

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pulseslegumesassociatedUKintakehigherCVDriskmarkerspopulationsconsumptionnutrientEAT-Lancetindex0 g/dayDietsbeanspeasstatussustainabledietscoreexpenditurerepresentativeSurveyFoodrespectivelyintakestotalP < 0increase0PulselegumePURPOSE:highimprovedcardiovasculardiseaserelationshiplesswellstudiedaddressassociationsdriedlentilsfreshgreenqualityfoodassessedMETHODS:secondaryanalysisdataNationalDietNutrition2008-2019LivingCosts2001-2022conductedassessrelationshipsregressionmodelscontrollingcovariatesusedRESULTS:Childrenadultsconsumedmean ± SD106 ± 27150 ± 21167 ± 325 g/day273 ± 26richenergyfibrevitaminEthiaminefolatebiotinsodiumpotassiumphosphorusmagnesiumironzincmanganeselowersaturatedfatsfreesugarsplasmaseleniumcarotenoidconcentrations05Consumptionportion80 g37point001Averagelegumes/person/week2022£168£290equivalent33%56%weeklyincomeCONCLUSIONS:legume-richdietsbroadlyoptimummicronutrientStrategiesneededpulseoptimalpopulationEATLancetIndexFamilymoduleNDNSNutrientPulses

Similar Articles

Cited By