Not Only Caseload but Also Patient Selection Is Predictive of Mortality After Pancreatic Resection.

Rene Mantke, Barbara Seliger, Shuji Ogino, Markus W B��chler, Richard Hunger
Author Information
  1. Rene Mantke: From the Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
  2. Barbara Seliger: Institute for Translational Immunology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
  3. Shuji Ogino: Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
  4. Markus W B��chler: Botton-Champalimaud Pancreatic Cancer Centre, Lisbon, Portugal.
  5. Richard Hunger: From the Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.

Abstract

Background: Centralization of pancreatic surgery in high-volume centers is regarded as a key strategy in improving the outcome quality. However, the specific factors, in addition to higher case volumes, that influence inhospital mortality remain unclear.
Methods: In this retrospective observational study, the German nationwide diagnostic-related groups statistics were analyzed for 86,073 patients with pancreatic resections. Hospitals performing at least 50 resections per year were identified as high-volume pancreatic centers (HVPCs). Statistical analyses compared crude and adjusted estimates of inhospital mortality for patients treated in HVPCs and non-HVPCs. A generalized mixed model was used for risk adjustment, considering various factors such as age group, sex, diagnosis, and comorbidities (ClinicalTrail.gov, NCT06390891).
Results: A total of 24.2% (n = 20,798) of all pancreatic resections were performed in 23 HVPCs. The crude inhospital mortality for all patients undergoing resection was 9.0%. Crude inhospital mortality in HVPCs was 5.5% compared with 10.1% in non-HVPCs ( < 0.001). HVPCs performed more complex resections including more concomitant procedures. On the other hand, HVPCs treated younger patients and patients with less complicated comorbidities. Statistical adjustment of comorbidities and patient characteristics resulted in a significant increase of inhospital mortality from 5.5% to 8.7% in HVPCs.
Conclusions: HVPCs have significantly lower inhospital mortality than the other hospitals. Nevertheless, the superior quality of outcome can be attributed not only to the enhanced expertise of the centers but also, at least in part, to a healthier patient population on average. However, the extent to which this patient selection is due to active selection by the practitioners or other causes remains unclear.

Keywords

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT06390891

References

  1. Int J Surg. 2022 May;101:106640 [PMID: 35525416]
  2. Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):130-139 [PMID: 29158237]
  3. Br J Surg. 2011 Apr;98(4):485-94 [PMID: 21500187]
  4. Cancer. 2005 Feb 1;103(3):435-41 [PMID: 15622523]
  5. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Oct;16(10):899-906 [PMID: 24905343]
  6. Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1206-18 [PMID: 25479696]
  7. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jun 2;364(22):2128-37 [PMID: 21631325]
  8. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4671-8 [PMID: 19720926]
  9. Ann Surg. 2014 Aug;260(2):244-51 [PMID: 24368634]
  10. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3002-3010 [PMID: 36592257]
  11. Surgery. 1999 Aug;126(2):178-83 [PMID: 10455881]
  12. Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):159-166 [PMID: 33234781]
  13. HPB (Oxford). 2023 Apr;25(4):387-399 [PMID: 36813680]
  14. N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37 [PMID: 11948273]
  15. JAMA Surg. 2022 Feb 1;157(2):120-128 [PMID: 34787667]
  16. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Dec;10(6):1080-1093 [PMID: 31949925]
  17. Biostatistics. 2009 Jan;10(1):17-31 [PMID: 18482997]
  18. Comput Math Methods Med. 2012;2012:829465 [PMID: 22474540]
  19. JAMA. 2006 Oct 25;296(16):1973-80 [PMID: 17062860]
  20. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr 10;10(7):683-685 [PMID: 28385405]
  21. Med Care. 2005 Nov;43(11):1130-9 [PMID: 16224307]
  22. JAMA. 1988 Dec 23-30;260(24):3611-6 [PMID: 3057250]
  23. JAMA Surg. 2023 Mar 1;158(3):284-291 [PMID: 36576819]
  24. N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27 [PMID: 14645640]
  25. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9 [PMID: 18313558]
  26. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;28(2):617-631 [PMID: 32699923]
  27. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 09;8(4):e59160 [PMID: 23593133]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HVPCspancreaticinhospitalmortalitypatientscentersresectionsqualitycomorbiditiespatientsurgeryhigh-volumeoutcomeHoweverfactorsunclearleastStatisticalcomparedcrudetreatednon-HVPCsadjustmentperformed55%selectionBackground:CentralizationregardedkeystrategyimprovingspecificadditionhighercasevolumesinfluenceremainMethods:retrospectiveobservationalstudyGermannationwidediagnostic-relatedgroupsstatisticsanalyzed86073Hospitalsperforming50peryearidentifiedanalysesadjustedestimatesgeneralizedmixedmodelusedriskconsideringvariousagegroupsexdiagnosisClinicalTrailgovNCT06390891Results:total242%n=2079823undergoingresection90%Crude101%<0001complexincludingconcomitantprocedureshandyoungerlesscomplicatedcharacteristicsresultedsignificantincrease87%Conclusions:significantlylowerhospitalsNeverthelesssuperiorcanattributedenhancedexpertisealsoparthealthierpopulationaverageextentdueactivepractitionerscausesremainsCaseloadAlsoPatientSelectionPredictiveMortalityPancreaticResectionassurancevolume-outcome-relationship

Similar Articles

Cited By