An Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc., Diagnostic Classification Among Spanish Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Claudio-Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez, María-Isabel Mariscal-Crespo, María-Naira Hernández-De Luis, Emília-Isabel Martins Teixeira-da-Costa, Héctor González-de la Torre, Rafaela Camacho-Bejarano
Author Information
  1. Claudio-Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez: Research Support Unit at Maternal and Child Insular University Hospital Complex, Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), 35016 Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain. ORCID
  2. María-Isabel Mariscal-Crespo: Faculty of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Andalusia, Spain. ORCID
  3. María-Naira Hernández-De Luis: Las Remudas Primary Health Care Centre; Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), 35213 Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain. ORCID
  4. Emília-Isabel Martins Teixeira-da-Costa: Nursing Department, School of Health Sciences, University of Algarve, 8000 Faro, Portugal. ORCID
  5. Héctor González-de la Torre: Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35016 Las Palmas, Canary Islands, Spain. ORCID
  6. Rafaela Camacho-Bejarano: Faculty of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Andalusia, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

: The NANDA International, Inc., (NANDA-I) diagnostic classification is the most widely used standardized nursing language internationally. The EVALUAN-I tool was developed to evaluate the NANDA-I diagnostic classification. The aim was to analyze the use of the NANDA-I diagnostic classification among Spanish nurses and assess its correlation with sociodemographic characteristics. : A cross-sectional study was conducted on a non-probabilistic sample of Spanish nurses working in clinical, management, and academic settings using the EVALUAN-I tool (September 2019-December 2020). The analysis was conducted using R (version 3.6.3, Lavaan package; R Core Team, 2020), with statistical significance set at < 0.05. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee (2019-190-1). A total of 483 responses were obtained. There was a correlation between the intensity of use of NANDA-I and its application in practice (polychoric correlation = 0.50; < 0.001). Nurses with a PhD degree considered nursing diagnoses to be less evidence-based ( = 0.037) but more useful ( = 0.035). Academic and research nurses stated that NANDA-I was more useful ( = 0.007), even for exclusive responsibilities ( = 0.034), and that it provided greater significance to diagnoses ( = 0.0012). NANDA-I is the most widely used standardized nursing language in Spain. Nurses' academic qualifications and work environment significantly influence their perceptions and use of NANDA-I. Advanced education fosters a critical yet positive perspective, highlighting a relationship between the intensity of its use, its application in clinical practice, and the nurse's educational background. Tools such as EVALUAN-I promote its integration and evidence-based practice, but challenges remain in improving perceptions, scientific evidence, and visibility in electronic health records to enhance its clinical impact and nursing recognition.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Sep;23(17-18):2681-4 [PMID: 24003834]
  2. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2023 Jan;34(1):21-34 [PMID: 35420728]
  3. Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Jan 01;42(1):44-52 [PMID: 37580054]
  4. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jun 19;10(6): [PMID: 35742192]
  5. West J Nurs Res. 2025 Mar;47(3):159-168 [PMID: 39758050]
  6. Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Aug;55:103168 [PMID: 34411879]
  7. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2019 Jul;30(3):173-189 [PMID: 30362270]
  8. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Apr;32(2):103-107 [PMID: 32706525]
  9. J Adv Nurs. 2023 Feb;79(2):832-849 [PMID: 36424724]
  10. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2017 Apr;28(2):109-119 [PMID: 26602330]
  11. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296 [PMID: 17941714]
  12. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2021 Jul;53(4):519-526 [PMID: 33860621]
  13. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 22;20(5): [PMID: 36900945]
  14. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 01;11(17): [PMID: 37685482]
  15. Int J Med Inform. 2021 May;149:104431 [PMID: 33713915]
  16. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021 Jul 07;55:e03766 [PMID: 34259756]
  17. West J Nurs Res. 2020 Nov;42(11):963-973 [PMID: 32075542]
  18. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2024 Sep 24;318:6-11 [PMID: 39320173]
  19. Nurs Res. 2022 Nov-Dec 01;71(6):469-476 [PMID: 35997708]
  20. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2022 Jul;33(3):165-168 [PMID: 35819858]
  21. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013 Jun;47(3):591-9 [PMID: 24601134]
  22. Am J Public Health. 1996 May;86(5):726-8 [PMID: 8629727]
  23. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2007;4(3):126-45 [PMID: 17850494]
  24. BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 15;24(1):55 [PMID: 39819792]
  25. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021 Aug 4;40(2):104-112 [PMID: 34347643]
  26. Rev Bras Enferm. 2024 Apr 22;77(1):e20230371 [PMID: 38655980]
  27. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jun;94:74-84 [PMID: 30939418]
  28. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Oct;94:215-21 [PMID: 27573329]
  29. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):3764-3783 [PMID: 28042921]
  30. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Aug;51(8):1160-70 [PMID: 24412062]
  31. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023 Nov;55(6):1126-1153 [PMID: 36959705]
  32. Int J Med Inform. 2024 Dec;192:105627 [PMID: 39306908]
  33. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2024 Oct 23;: [PMID: 39439415]
  34. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2021 Oct;32(4):220-228 [PMID: 33580632]
  35. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;9(11): [PMID: 34828504]
  36. Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70003 [PMID: 39166373]
  37. BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 23;7(2):e013659 [PMID: 28235968]
  38. Nurse Educ. 2010 Jul-Aug;35(4):162-6 [PMID: 20548185]
  39. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2023 Oct;34(4):276-283 [PMID: 36303464]
  40. J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7010-7035 [PMID: 37485751]
  41. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1149-1165 [PMID: 32651588]
  42. J Clin Nurs. 2017 Feb;26(3-4):379-387 [PMID: 27192041]

Grants

  1. ENF19/33/Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC)

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.00NANDA-Inursing=usediagnosticclassificationstandardizedEVALUAN-ISpanishnursescorrelationclinicalpractice:NANDAInternationalIncwidelyusedlanguagetoolstudyconductedacademicusing2020R3significance<intensityapplicationdiagnosesevidence-basedusefulresearchperceptionsinternationallydevelopedevaluateaimanalyzeamongassesssociodemographiccharacteristicscross-sectionalnon-probabilisticsampleworkingmanagementsettingsSeptember2019-Decemberanalysisversion6LavaanpackageCoreTeamstatisticalset05approvedResearchEthicsCommittee2019-190-1total483responsesobtainedpolychoric50001NursesPhDdegreeconsideredless037035Academicstated007evenexclusiveresponsibilities034providedgreater0012SpainNurses'qualificationsworkenvironmentsignificantlyinfluenceAdvancededucationfosterscriticalyetpositiveperspectivehighlightingrelationshipnurse'seducationalbackgroundToolspromoteintegrationchallengesremainimprovingscientificevidencevisibilityelectronichealthrecordsenhanceimpactrecognitionEvaluationDiagnosticClassificationAmongNurses:Cross-SectionalStudydiagnosismethodologyterminologysurveysquestionnaires

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.