Association between mean hemodynamic variables during the first 24 h and outcomes in cardiogenic shock: identification of clinically relevant thresholds.

Bruno Levy, Anais Curtiaud, Kevin Duarte, Clément Delmas, Julien Demiselle, Nicolas Girerd, Caroline Eva Gebhard, Julie Helms, Ferhat Meziani, Antoine Kimmoun, Hamid Merdji
Author Information
  1. Bruno Levy: Medical Intensive Care Unit Brabois, INSERM U1116, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, CHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
  2. Anais Curtiaud: Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), 1, Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
  3. Kevin Duarte: Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique, INSERM 1433, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, CHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
  4. Clément Delmas: Intensive Cardiac Care Unit, Cardiology Department, Rangueil University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
  5. Julien Demiselle: Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), 1, Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
  6. Nicolas Girerd: Centre d'Investigations Cliniques Plurithématique, INSERM 1433, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, CHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
  7. Caroline Eva Gebhard: Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
  8. Julie Helms: Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), 1, Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
  9. Ferhat Meziani: Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), 1, Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France.
  10. Antoine Kimmoun: Medical Intensive Care Unit Brabois, INSERM U1116, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, CHRU de Nancy, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France.
  11. Hamid Merdji: Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Strasbourg (UNISTRA), 1, Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg Cedex, France. hamid.merdji@chru-strasbourg.fr.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a critical condition with high mortality rates despite advances in treatment. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate both macrocirculatory and tissue perfusion variables over the initial 24 h post-admission to determine their impact on patient prognosis and identify potential hemodynamic thresholds for optimal outcomes. Secondary aims were to explore the correlation between macrocirculatory and tissue perfusion variables.
DESIGN: This is a post hoc analysis of data from two prospective studies, OptimaCC (NCT01367743) and MicroShock (NCT03436641), involving only patients with CS. Both studies applied regular assessment of hemodynamic variables at specific time points (admission, 6, 12, and 24 h) to ensure consistency in data collection, enrolling 118 patients between September 2011 and July 2021, with similar inclusion criteria and care processes.
RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 69 years, 59% being male. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, occurred in 37% of patients. Average macrocirculation variables over the first 24 h of CS such as mean arterial pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), cardiac index (CI), and cardiac power index (CPI) were significantly lower in patients meeting the primary outcome. Accordingly, average tissue perfusion variables (ΔPCO and ΔPCO/C(a-v)O) over the first 24 h of CS were also consistently impaired in patients meeting the primary outcome. The optimal clinically relevant thresholds of the first 24 h time course for poor outcomes, closely approximating the optimal values identified in the analysis, were: mean SAP < 95 mmHg, MAP < 70 mmHg, CO < 3.5 L/min, CI ≤ 1.8 L/min/m, CPI < 0.27 W/m, ScvO < 70%, ΔPCO ≥ 9 mmHg, and ΔPCO/C(a-v)O ≥ 1.5 mmHg/mL.
CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to identify critical hemodynamic thresholds, encompassing both macrocirculatory and tissue perfusion variables, within the initial 24 h of CS that are associated with adverse outcomes. The identified thresholds suggest specific hemodynamic targets that may guide resuscitation strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 10;72(2):173-182 [PMID: 29976291]
  2. Am J Cardiol. 1977 Feb;39(2):137-45 [PMID: 835473]
  3. Circulation. 1966 May;33(5):753-62 [PMID: 5936693]
  4. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 1;99(1):19-26 [PMID: 33871159]
  5. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Oct;35(10):3067-3077 [PMID: 33069558]
  6. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Nov 15;206(10):1230-1238 [PMID: 35849736]
  7. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2021 Oct 1;10(7):712-720 [PMID: 34382063]
  8. Shock. 2018 Aug;50(2):167-172 [PMID: 29112104]
  9. Circulation. 2023 Oct 3;148(14):1113-1126 [PMID: 37782695]
  10. Br J Anaesth. 1992 Oct;69(4):409-10 [PMID: 1419454]
  11. Crit Care. 2013 Dec 13;17(6):R294 [PMID: 24330804]
  12. ESC Heart Fail. 2022 Feb;9(1):408-419 [PMID: 34973047]
  13. Minerva Anestesiol. 2019 Dec;85(12):1308-1314 [PMID: 31238640]
  14. Intensive Care Med. 2014 May;40(5):654-66 [PMID: 24615559]
  15. Crit Care. 2020 Aug 20;24(1):513 [PMID: 32819421]
  16. Shock. 2020 Dec;54(6):744-750 [PMID: 32496416]
  17. Respiration. 2001;68(3):279-85 [PMID: 11416249]
  18. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 May 6;13(1):38 [PMID: 37148451]
  19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Jul 21;44(2):340-8 [PMID: 15261929]
  20. Intensive Care Med. 2011 May;37(5):801-7 [PMID: 21373821]
  21. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34 [PMID: 10460813]
  22. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Apr;22(4):664-672 [PMID: 32078218]
  23. Intensive Care Med. 2002 Mar;28(3):272-7 [PMID: 11904655]
  24. Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Sep 6;13(1):80 [PMID: 37672139]
  25. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 8;79(9):933-946 [PMID: 35115207]
  26. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep 1;94(3):481-505 [PMID: 31313449]
  27. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Nov;50(11):1814-1829 [PMID: 39254735]
  28. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 May 19;65(19):2140-1 [PMID: 25861962]
  29. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Jan;105(1):5-12 [PMID: 22369912]
  30. Br Med J. 1970 Oct 31;4(5730):276-8 [PMID: 4920225]
  31. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 May;25(5):609-615 [PMID: 36987926]
  32. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 5;12(23):e032748 [PMID: 37930059]
  33. JACC Adv. 2022 May 27;1(2):100034 [PMID: 38939320]
  34. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815 [PMID: 25392034]
  35. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023 Oct 25;12(10):651-660 [PMID: 37640029]
  36. Circulation. 2008 Feb 5;117(5):686-97 [PMID: 18250279]
  37. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-3726 [PMID: 34447992]
  38. Am Heart J. 1991 Jul;122(1 Pt 1):27-33 [PMID: 2063757]
  39. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Feb;42(2):211-21 [PMID: 26578172]
  40. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 21;12(22):e031427 [PMID: 37982222]
  41. Am Heart J. 2018 May;199:181-191 [PMID: 29754660]

MeSH Term

Humans
Shock, Cardiogenic
Male
Female
Aged
Hemodynamics
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Time Factors
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Cardiac Output

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0variables24 hCSperfusionhemodynamicthresholdspatientsfirsttissueoutcomesmacrocirculatoryoptimalprimaryoutcomemeancardiacCardiogenicshockcriticalmortalitystudyaimsinitialidentifyanalysisdatastudiesspecifictimeindexmeetingΔPCO/Ca-vclinicallyrelevantidentifiedPURPOSE:remainsconditionhighratesdespiteadvancestreatmentcomprehensivelyevaluatepost-admissiondetermineimpactpatientprognosispotentialSecondaryexplorecorrelationDESIGN:posthoctwoprospectiveOptimaCCNCT01367743MicroShockNCT03436641involvingappliedregularassessmentpointsadmission612ensureconsistencycollectionenrolling118September2011July2021similarinclusioncriteriacareprocessesRESULTS:medianagecohort69 years59%male30-dayoccurred37%AveragemacrocirculationarterialpressureMAPoutputCOCIpowerCPIsignificantlylowerAccordinglyaverageΔPCOOalsoconsistentlyimpairedcoursepoorcloselyapproximatingvalueswere:SAP < 95 mmHgMAP < 70 mmHgCO < 35 L/minCI ≤ 18 L/min/mCPI < 027 W/mScvO < 70%ΔPCO ≥ 9 mmHgO ≥ 15 mmHg/mLCONCLUSIONS:encompassingwithinassociatedadversesuggesttargetsmayguideresuscitationstrategiesAssociationcardiogenicshock:identificationHeartfailureMacrocirculationTissue

Similar Articles

Cited By