Complementary role of transcriptomic endotyping and protein-based biomarkers for risk stratification in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.

Bengi S Tavris, Christian Morath, Christoph Rupp, Roman Szudarek, Florian Uhle, Timothy E Sweeney, Oliver Liesenfeld, Mascha O Fiedler-Kalenka, Simon Dubler, Martin Zeier, Felix C F Schmitt, Markus A Weigand, Thorsten Brenner, Christian Nusshag
Author Information
  1. Bengi S Tavris: Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  2. Christian Morath: Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  3. Christoph Rupp: Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  4. Roman Szudarek: Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  5. Florian Uhle: Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  6. Timothy E Sweeney: Clinical Affairs, Inflammatix Inc., Redwood City, USA.
  7. Oliver Liesenfeld: Clinical Affairs, Inflammatix Inc., Redwood City, USA.
  8. Mascha O Fiedler-Kalenka: Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  9. Simon Dubler: Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  10. Martin Zeier: Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  11. Felix C F Schmitt: Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  12. Markus A Weigand: Department of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  13. Thorsten Brenner: Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
  14. Christian Nusshag: Department of Nephrology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Christian.Nusshag@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is a prevalent and severe complication in critically ill patients. However, diagnostic and therapeutic advancements have been hindered by the biological heterogeneity underlying the disease. Both transcriptomic endotyping and biomarker profiling have been proposed individually to identify molecular subtypes of sepsis and may enhance risk stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of combining transcriptomic endotyping with protein-based biomarkers for improving risk stratification in SA-AKI.
METHODS: This secondary analysis of the PredARRT-Sep-Trial included 167 critically ill patients who met Sepsis-3 criteria. Patients were stratified into three transcriptomic endotypes-inflammopathic (IE), adaptive (AE), and coagulopathic (CE)-using a validated whole-blood gene expression classifier. Eight protein-based biomarkers encompassing kidney function, vascular integrity, and immune response were measured. Predictive performance for the primary endpoint kidney replacement therapy or death was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Stratification into transcriptomic endotypes assigned 33% of patients to IE, 42% to AE, and 24% to CE. Patients classified as IE exhibited the highest disease severity and were most likely to meet the primary endpoint (30%), compared to AE and CE (17% and 10%, respectively). Kidney function biomarkers showed stepwise increases with AKI severity across all endotypes, whereas non-functional biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL], soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor [suPAR], and bioactive adrenomedullin [bio-ADM]) exhibited endotype-specific differences independent of AKI severity. NGAL and suPAR levels were disproportionately elevated in the IE group, suggesting a dominant role of innate immune dysregulation in this endotype. In contrast, bio-ADM, a marker of endothelial dysfunction, was the strongest risk-predictor of outcomes in CE. The combination of transcriptomic endotyping with protein-based biomarkers enhanced predictive accuracy for the primary endpoint and 7-day mortality, with the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.80 (95% CI 0.72-0.88) for endotyping + bio-ADM and 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.93) for endotyping and suPAR, respectively. Combinations of endotyping with functional and non-functional biomarkers particularly improved mortality-related risk stratification.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining transcriptomic endotyping with protein-based biomarker profiling enhances risk-stratification in SA-AKI, offering a promising strategy for personalized treatment and trial enrichment in the future. Further research should validate these findings and explore therapeutic applications.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 27;7(9):e017046 [PMID: 28963294]
  2. Nat Immunol. 2015 Apr;16(4):343-53 [PMID: 25789684]
  3. Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;21(6):732-743 [PMID: 30843353]
  4. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 29;369(9):840-51 [PMID: 23984731]
  5. Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;45(9):e932-e940 [PMID: 28614196]
  6. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023 Jun;19(6):401-417 [PMID: 36823168]
  7. Crit Care. 2023 Jul 20;27(1):292 [PMID: 37474944]
  8. Lancet. 2019 Nov 23;394(10212):1949-1964 [PMID: 31777389]
  9. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Mar;41(3):427-35 [PMID: 25619485]
  10. BMC Nephrol. 2016 Aug 02;17(1):109 [PMID: 27484681]
  11. J Biol Chem. 1993 May 15;268(14):10425-32 [PMID: 7683678]
  12. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Apr 1;199(7):863-872 [PMID: 30334632]
  13. JAMA. 2005 Aug 17;294(7):813-8 [PMID: 16106006]
  14. Biomolecules. 2021 Jul 10;11(7): [PMID: 34356636]
  15. Clin Biochem. 2018 Aug;58:72-77 [PMID: 29782819]
  16. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R99 [PMID: 21418617]
  17. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013 Dec;13(12):862-74 [PMID: 24232462]
  18. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021 Oct;142:112002 [PMID: 34463264]
  19. Lancet. 2021 Apr 3;397(10281):1293-1300 [PMID: 33812488]
  20. Kidney Int. 2019 Jul;96(1):52-57 [PMID: 30926137]
  21. JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10 [PMID: 26903338]
  22. Crit Care. 2024 Mar 12;28(1):73 [PMID: 38475786]
  23. Thromb Res. 2019 Jun;178:182-188 [PMID: 31054468]
  24. Crit Care. 2005 Apr;9(2):R139-43 [PMID: 15774046]
  25. J Intern Med. 2021 Jun;289(6):792-806 [PMID: 33381880]
  26. Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):748-759 [PMID: 33591001]
  27. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0267497 [PMID: 35482727]
  28. JCI Insight. 2023 Apr 10;8(7): [PMID: 37036003]
  29. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014 Oct;25(10):2177-86 [PMID: 24904085]
  30. Intensive Care Med. 2015 Aug;41(8):1411-23 [PMID: 26162677]
  31. Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):e1232-e1241 [PMID: 33044285]
  32. Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Nov 1;536:135-141 [PMID: 36150522]
  33. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Sep;38(9):1418-28 [PMID: 22706919]
  34. Kidney Int Rep. 2023 Aug 19;8(11):2345-2355 [PMID: 38025210]
  35. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84 [PMID: 22890468]
  36. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep 15;202(6):822-829 [PMID: 32516543]
  37. N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1431-1442 [PMID: 30304656]
  38. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Nov 6;15(11):1557-1565 [PMID: 33033164]
  39. Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):75-87 [PMID: 29937192]
  40. Crit Care Med. 2018 Jun;46(6):915-925 [PMID: 29537985]
  41. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2020 Dec 18;8(Suppl 1):20 [PMID: 33336293]
  42. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):240-251 [PMID: 32668114]
  43. Crit Care. 2011 Jul 08;15(4):171 [PMID: 21861864]
  44. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):122-33 [PMID: 27181456]
  45. Shock. 2022 Mar 1;57(3):384-391 [PMID: 35081076]
  46. Crit Care. 2020 Apr 15;24(1):150 [PMID: 32295614]
  47. Nature. 2004 Dec 16;432(7019):917-21 [PMID: 15531878]
  48. Nephron Clin Pract. 2014;127(1-4):180-4 [PMID: 25343846]
  49. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2019209 [PMID: 33021646]
  50. Kidney Int. 2009 Aug;76(4):422-7 [PMID: 19436332]

MeSH Term

Humans
Acute Kidney Injury
Biomarkers
Male
Female
Sepsis
Middle Aged
Aged
Risk Assessment
Transcriptome
ROC Curve

Chemicals

Biomarkers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0endotypingtranscriptomicbiomarkerskidneystratificationprotein-basedriskIECE0injurySA-AKIpatientsAEprimaryendpointseverityacutecriticallyilltherapeuticdiseasebiomarkerprofilinganalysisPatientsfunctionimmunereceiveroperatingcharacteristiccurveendotypesexhibitedhighestrespectivelyAKInon-functionalsuPARrole95%CIBACKGROUND:Sepsis-associatedprevalentseverecomplicationHoweverdiagnosticadvancementshinderedbiologicalheterogeneityunderlyingproposedindividuallyidentifymolecularsubtypessepsismayenhancestudyaimedevaluateutilitycombiningimprovingMETHODS:secondaryPredARRT-Sep-Trialincluded167metSepsis-3criteriastratifiedthreeendotypes-inflammopathicadaptivecoagulopathic-usingvalidatedwhole-bloodgeneexpressionclassifierEightencompassingvascularintegrityresponsemeasuredPredictiveperformancereplacementtherapydeathassessedusinglogisticregressionmodelsRESULTS:Stratificationassigned33%42%24%classifiedlikelymeet30%compared17%10%Kidneyshowedstepwiseincreasesacrosswhereasneutrophilgelatinase-associatedlipocalin[NGAL]soluble urokinaseplasminogenactivatorreceptor [suPAR]bioactiveadrenomedullin[bio-ADM]endotype-specificdifferencesindependentNGALlevelsdisproportionatelyelevatedgroupsuggestingdominantinnatedysregulationendotypecontrastbio-ADMmarkerendothelialdysfunctionstrongestrisk-predictoroutcomescombinationenhancedpredictiveaccuracy7-daymortalityarea8072-088endotyping + bio-ADM8578-093Combinationsfunctionalparticularlyimprovedmortality-relatedCONCLUSIONS:Combiningenhancesrisk-stratificationofferingpromisingstrategypersonalizedtreatmenttrialenrichmentfutureresearchvalidatefindingsexploreapplicationsComplementarysepsis-associatedAcuteBiomarkersRiskSepsisTranscriptomic

Similar Articles

Cited By