Reliability of a non-invasive method to calculate buffer capacity after exhaustive cycling exercise of 20���s to 12���min: a pilot study.

Sebastian Gehlert, Asatur Khurshudyan, Sebastian Weber, Jochem Widdershoven, Reinout Van Schuylenbergh
Author Information
  1. Sebastian Gehlert: Institut f��r Sportwissenschaft, University of Hildesheim, Hildesheim, Lower Saxony, Germany.
  2. Asatur Khurshudyan: INSCYD GmbH, Salenstein, Switzerland.
  3. Sebastian Weber: INSCYD GmbH, Salenstein, Switzerland.
  4. Jochem Widdershoven: INSCYD GmbH, Salenstein, Switzerland.
  5. Reinout Van Schuylenbergh: INSCYD GmbH, Salenstein, Switzerland.

Abstract

Traditionally, buffer capacity () is measured on muscle biopsies by measuring changes in muscle pH in relation to exposure of standardized quantities of hydrochloric acid. This is an invasive approach requiring specific equipment and trained personnel which limits its usability in a normal training context. Assessing using capillary blood lactate concentration (BLC) and pH values has been proposed as a more practical and cost-effective approach. The reliability of the input BLC and pH data on the calculations of after maximal sprint and endurance exercise has not yet been investigated and was major aim of our study. Eleven subjects performed six maximal performance tests ranging from 20���s to 12���min duration over a 2-week period. All subjects were familiarized with the test conditions. For each performance test, pre and posttest BLC and pH was measured and used to calculate using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation. As BLC and pH values showed poor reliability, calculations were repeated using constants for BLC (1.23���mmol��L) and pH (7.426) chosen from the average values in the experimental data. Test-retest reliability for BLC (ICC: 0.12, 95% CI -0.49-0.65, n.s.) and pH (ICC: 0.40, 95% CI -0.22-0.79, n.s.) was poor, whereas BLC (ICC: 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-0.99, ���<���0.05) and pH (ICC: 0.89, 95% CI 0.65-0.97, ���<���0.05) displayed good to excellent reliability. Good reliability was observed for calculated from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation utilizing BLC and pH only (ICC: 0.86, 95% CI 0.55-0.96, ���<���0.05). The validity of this method in comparison with gold-standard methods needs further scientific investigation.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Nov;48(11):2339-2342 [PMID: 27755383]
  2. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Feb;96(3):225-34 [PMID: 16235069]
  3. Int J Sports Med. 2005 Dec;26(10):874-9 [PMID: 16320173]
  4. J Physiol. 1975 Aug;250(1):1-22 [PMID: 16992502]
  5. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Jan 03;18(2):157-163 [PMID: 36596309]
  6. J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Feb;29(2):321-9 [PMID: 25144132]
  7. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009 Sep;107(1):105-11 [PMID: 19526366]
  8. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Nov;38(11):2004-11 [PMID: 17095936]
  9. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2021 Sep 9;18(1):61 [PMID: 34503527]
  10. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2024 Dec;124(12):3781-3788 [PMID: 39158591]
  11. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993 Sep;75(3):1412-8 [PMID: 8226558]
  12. Int J Sports Med. 1984 Oct;5(5):228-31 [PMID: 6094373]
  13. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 May;46(5):579-84 [PMID: 12027853]
  14. Pflugers Arch. 1975;356(3):209-22 [PMID: 239385]
  15. J Sci Med Sport. 2013 May;16(3):286-9 [PMID: 22884738]
  16. Sports Med. 2022 Mar;52(3):505-526 [PMID: 34687438]
  17. Clin Chem. 1999 Apr;45(4):561-6 [PMID: 10102917]
  18. Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):532-553 [PMID: 38320802]
  19. Sports Med. 2006;36(4):279-91 [PMID: 16573355]
  20. J Physiol. 1993 Mar;462:115-33 [PMID: 8331579]
  21. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2016 Dec 1;121(6):1290-1305 [PMID: 27742804]
  22. J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63 [PMID: 27330520]
  23. Physiol Rep. 2023 Nov;11(22):e15876 [PMID: 37996974]
  24. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Dec 28;367(2):143-9 [PMID: 13343]
  25. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 May;102(5):1936-44 [PMID: 17289910]
  26. Clin Chem. 1993 May;39(5):908 [PMID: 8485890]
  27. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014 Aug;114(8):1715-24 [PMID: 24832191]
  28. Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):191-225 [PMID: 20585013]
  29. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Jul;26(7):1975-83 [PMID: 22505127]
  30. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;76(5):462-71 [PMID: 9367287]
  31. Br J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;52(7):439-455 [PMID: 29540367]
  32. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1985 Jan;58(1):14-7 [PMID: 3968004]
  33. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2008 May;193(1):17-24 [PMID: 18267000]
  34. Int J Sports Med. 2000 Nov;21(8):593-7 [PMID: 11156281]
  35. NMR Biomed. 2020 Feb 10;:e4246 [PMID: 32037688]
  36. Am J Physiol. 1999 Feb;276(2):E255-61 [PMID: 9950784]
  37. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;75(1):7-13 [PMID: 9007451]
  38. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Jul;92(3):263-6 [PMID: 15083366]
  39. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Sep;101(3):918-25 [PMID: 16627675]
  40. Acta Physiol Scand. 1984 Nov;122(3):331-9 [PMID: 6516884]
  41. J Sports Sci Med. 2015 Mar 01;14(1):203-14 [PMID: 25729309]
  42. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Jan;96(1):97-105 [PMID: 16283370]
  43. Physiol Rep. 2024 Aug;12(16):e70020 [PMID: 39187400]
  44. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Mar;28(3):386-91 [PMID: 8776228]
  45. J Physiol. 2022 Jul;600(13):3069-3081 [PMID: 35593645]
  46. Front Physiol. 2023 Apr 13;14:1147321 [PMID: 37123252]
  47. Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Dec;523:497-503 [PMID: 34748780]
  48. J Sports Sci. 2010 Jul;28(9):975-82 [PMID: 20544484]
  49. Physiol Rep. 2024 May;12(10):e16086 [PMID: 38783143]
  50. Physiol Rev. 1997 Apr;77(2):321-58 [PMID: 9114817]
  51. Front Physiol. 2018 Jul 10;9:862 [PMID: 30042692]
  52. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2004 Sep;287(3):R502-16 [PMID: 15308499]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pHBLC0reliabilityICC:95%CIbuffercapacityusingvaluesexercise���<���005measuredmuscleapproachlactatedatacalculationsmaximalstudysubjectsperformance20���stestcalculateequationpoor-0nsmethodcyclingTraditionallybiopsiesmeasuringchangesrelationexposurestandardizedquantitieshydrochloricacidinvasiverequiringspecificequipmenttrainedpersonnellimitsusabilitynormaltrainingcontextAssessingcapillarybloodconcentrationproposedpracticalcost-effectiveinputsprintenduranceyetinvestigatedmajoraimElevenperformedsixtestsranging12���minduration2-weekperiodfamiliarizedconditionspreposttestusedHenderson-Hasselbachshowedrepeatedconstants123���mmol��L7426chosenaverageexperimentalTest-retest1249-0654022-079whereas9582-0998965-097displayedgoodexcellentGoodobservedcalculatedHenderson-Hasselbalchutilizing8655-096validitycomparisongold-standardmethodsneedsscientificinvestigationReliabilitynon-invasiveexhaustive12���min:pilotinducedacidosis

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.