What is the best surgical approach for esophageal cancer?

Verena Tripke, Vladimir J Lozanovski, Carolina Mann, Hauke Lang, Peter P Grimminger
Author Information
  1. Verena Tripke: Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  2. Vladimir J Lozanovski: Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. ORCID
  3. Carolina Mann: Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  4. Hauke Lang: Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  5. Peter P Grimminger: Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. ORCID

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive tumor entity, and oncologic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy after perioperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for curative treatment. Oncological esophagectomy is a complex procedure associated with a relevant surgical trauma. Complications, such as severe pulmonary infections and anastomotic leakage with mediastinitis lead to a high morbidity rate. To reduce the surgical trauma, the minimally invasive technique was introduced in esophageal surgery. Minimally invasive esophagectomy is associated with less postoperative pain and a reduced rate of pulmonary infections. Currently, there are two major different totally minimally invasive techniques, the conventional laparoscopic/thoracoscopic approach (MIE) and the robotic assisted approach (RAMIE). Both methods require teaching due to the flat learning curve associated with these complex procedures. However, both MIE and RAMIE are performed safely in specialized centers. They are associated with improved short-term outcome and similar oncological outcome compared to open esophagectomy. The robotic assisted approach has additional benefits that may be supported by the results of more randomized controlled trials in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1060 [PMID: 34565343]
  2. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030907 [PMID: 31748296]
  3. Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3873-81 [PMID: 26659248]
  4. Dis Esophagus. 2020 Apr 15;33(4): [PMID: 31206577]
  5. Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92 [PMID: 22552194]
  6. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Jul;12(7):681-92 [PMID: 21684205]
  7. Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):646-653 [PMID: 34171870]
  8. Br J Surg. 2024 Jul 2;111(7): [PMID: 38960881]
  9. Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-630 [PMID: 30308612]
  10. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13 [PMID: 15273542]
  11. Surg Endosc. 2006 Sep;20(9):1435-9 [PMID: 16703427]
  12. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;66(5):404-406 [PMID: 28869991]
  13. Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):486-94; discussion 494-5 [PMID: 14530720]
  14. Ann Surg. 2023 Jul 1;278(1):39-50 [PMID: 36538615]
  15. Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):814-821 [PMID: 28796646]
  16. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):95-103 [PMID: 22668811]
  17. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):232-236 [PMID: 28187044]
  18. Ann Surg. 2022 Nov 1;276(5):e386-e392 [PMID: 33177354]
  19. Thorac Cancer. 2023 Jan;14(1):3-11 [PMID: 36482832]
  20. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):597-603 [PMID: 25190126]
  21. J Surg Res. 2023 Mar;283:152-160 [PMID: 36410231]
  22. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Aug;66(5):401-403 [PMID: 28514810]
  23. Eur Surg. 2018;50(6):249-255 [PMID: 30546384]
  24. Ann Surg. 2017 Nov;266(5):863-869 [PMID: 28742691]
  25. N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 21;347(21):1662-9 [PMID: 12444180]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 4;349(23):2241-52 [PMID: 14657432]
  27. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162 [PMID: 30625052]
  28. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):545-53 [PMID: 17540306]
  29. Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):4957-4965 [PMID: 29931451]
  30. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1992 Feb;37(1):7-11 [PMID: 1573620]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0approachesophagectomyassociatedinvasivesurgicalminimallyroboticassistedcomplextraumapulmonaryinfectionsrateesophagealtechniqueslaparoscopic/thoracoscopicMIERAMIEoutcomeEsophagealcanceraggressivetumorentityoncologictwo-fieldlymphadenectomyperioperativechemotherapychemoradiotherapystandardcarecurativetreatmentOncologicalprocedurerelevantComplicationssevereanastomoticleakagemediastinitisleadhighmorbidityreducetechniqueintroducedsurgeryMinimallylesspostoperativepainreducedCurrentlytwomajordifferenttotallyconventionalmethodsrequireteachingdueflatlearningcurveproceduresHoweverperformedsafelyspecializedcentersimprovedshort-termsimilaroncologicalcomparedopenadditionalbenefitsmaysupportedresultsrandomizedcontrolledtrialsfuturebestcancer?esophagectomy

Similar Articles

Cited By