Effect of Prophylactic Dual Histamine Blockade on Filgrastim-Induced Bone Pain in Female Cancer Patients: Single Institutional Analysis.

Noor Ul Ain Azam, Fauzia Abdus Samad, Abdus Samad Syed, Asif Riaz Khan, Aalia Mushtaq, Faraz Saif
Author Information
  1. Noor Ul Ain Azam: Department of Medical Oncology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. ORCID
  2. Fauzia Abdus Samad: Department of Medical Oncology, Foundation University Medical College, Pakistan. ORCID
  3. Abdus Samad Syed: Department of Radiation Oncology, Combined Military Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. ORCID
  4. Asif Riaz Khan: Department of Medical Oncology, Life Care Hospital and research institute, Peshawar, Pakistan. ORCID
  5. Aalia Mushtaq: Department of Medical Oncology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. ORCID
  6. Faraz Saif: Department of Medical Oncology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. ORCID

Abstract

Bone pain is the commonest side-effect faced by cancer patients receiving granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy for the primary or secondary prevention of febrile neutropenia. We conducted a prospective quasi-experimental study at our setup to see the efficacy of dual histamine blockade (combined H1 and H2 receptor blockers) for preventing G-CSF-induced bone pain. Adult female patients with solid tumors who had received filgrastim for the primary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia and met our inclusion criteria, were enrolled (���=���119). This population was analyzed for the development of significant bone pain 24���h after the administration of Filgrastim. Significant bone pain in our study was defined as emergence of new onset pain measuring ���4 on 11-point Numerical rating scale (NRS) or at least ��� 2-point increase in score when compared to the baseline pain (if any). Those patients who experienced significant bone pain (���=���47) were given Loratadine 10���mg and Famotidine 20���mg orally half an hour before the next filgrastim administration. Pain assessment was done 24���h after Filgrastim administration, using NRS and data was analyzed. The mean NRS score in our patients after administration of filgrastim was 6.87��������1.055. Most of these patients (���=���34 i.e 72%) experienced relief in bone pain after dual histamine blockade use. The mean NRS score following the use of dual antihistamines was 4.36��������1.870. The NRS score improved by a mean of 2.51 after using dual histamine blockade, which was statistically significant (p-value= 0.0005). We propose that dualhistamine blockade may prove to be an effective option for prophylaxis of G-CSF-induced-bone-pain. Randomized control trials on larger and more diverse patient populations are required to reinforce the findings.

Keywords

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0painboneNRSpatientsdualhistamineblockadefilgrastimadministrationscoresignificantmeanBoneG-CSFprimaryfebrileneutropeniastudyprophylaxisanalyzed24���hFilgrastimexperiencedPainusingusecommonestside-effectfacedcancerreceivinggranulocytecolonystimulatingfactortherapysecondarypreventionconductedprospectivequasi-experimentalsetupseeefficacycombinedH1H2receptorblockerspreventingG-CSF-inducedAdultfemalesolidtumorsreceivedmetinclusioncriteriaenrolled���=���119populationdevelopmentSignificantdefinedemergencenewonsetmeasuring���411-pointNumericalratingscaleleast���2-pointincreasecomparedbaseline���=���47givenLoratadine10���mgFamotidine20���mgorallyhalfhournextassessmentdonedata687��������1055���=���34ie72%relieffollowingantihistamines436��������1870improved251statisticallyp-value=00005proposedualhistaminemayproveeffectiveoptionG-CSF-induced-bone-painRandomizedcontroltrialslargerdiversepatientpopulationsrequiredreinforcefindingsEffectProphylacticDualHistamineBlockadeFilgrastim-InducedFemaleCancerPatients:SingleInstitutionalAnalysisanti

Similar Articles

Cited By