Starting Two or More Drugs Concurrently in Primary Care: How Often Is It Done, How Often Is It Needed?

Tewodros Eguale, Maria Mirica, Alejandra Salazar, John Shilka, William Galanter, John Cashy, Walid Gellad, Jennifer Hale, Bruce L Lambert, Aneesha Fathima Syed Mohamed, Renuka Kandikatla, Lynn A Volk, Adam Wright, Jeffrey A Linder, Gordon D Schiff
Author Information
  1. Tewodros Eguale: Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
  2. Maria Mirica: Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
  3. Alejandra Salazar: Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
  4. John Shilka: University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  5. William Galanter: University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  6. John Cashy: VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  7. Walid Gellad: VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  8. Jennifer Hale: VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  9. Bruce L Lambert: Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
  10. Aneesha Fathima Syed Mohamed: Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
  11. Renuka Kandikatla: Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA.
  12. Lynn A Volk: Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
  13. Adam Wright: Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
  14. Jeffrey A Linder: Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
  15. Gordon D Schiff: Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA. gschiff@bwh.harvard.edu. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is growing awareness of the need for more cautious, conservative prescribing. One conservative prescribing principle urges prescribers, whenever possible, to start only one new medication at a time. Little is known about how often primary care physicians (PCPs) start multiple medications at the same time, and when that is needed.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how frequently PCPs start multiple prescriptions at the same time, evaluate evidence supporting the necessity of initiating multiple prescriptions concurrently, and describe PCP and clinical sites' prescribing variability.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
PARTICIPANTS: PCPs at four sites who wrote prescriptions during January 2017-December 2018.
MAIN MEASURES: Frequency of initiating two or more new prescriptions during the same session.
KEY RESULTS: Across the four sites, 4646 PCPs wrote 7,849,914 new prescriptions. The Veterans Administration (VA) site had the highest percentage of encounters with multiple concurrent new drug starts (27.2%), followed by Northwestern (NW) (19.7%), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) (16.1%), and University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) (14.0%). Within each site, there was wide variation among PCPs in percentage of encounters where they prescribed multiple new medications. Interquartile range varied: 11.0-18.5% (BWH), 15.1-22% (NW), 11.0-15.8% (UIC), and 22.9-31.0% (VA). Reviewing the most frequent combinations, only 0.6% had strong evidence for starting them concurrently. Most were drugs either recommended to be taken together (16.8%) or reasonable to be taken together, but with no evidence supporting starting them simultaneously (71.5%). A smaller percentage of concurrent starts were potentially problematic (10.4%) or contraindicated (0.7%) due to overlapping side effects or drug-drug interactions.
CONCLUSIONS: PCPs frequently started multiple medications concurrently, often without compelling evidence, with notable variations across prescribers and institutions. Although we could not conduct detailed chart review for each encounter, classification of the most frequent drug pairs concurrently prescribed in our study suggests opportunities to potentially improve prescribing safety.

References

  1. Foster KR, Vecchia P, Repacholi MH. Science and the precautionary principle. Science 2000;288(5468):979-981. [PMID: 10841718]
  2. Kriebel D, Tickner J, Epstein P, et al. The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect 2001;109(9):871-876. [PMID: 11673114]
  3. Organization WH. Medication safety in polypharmacy: technical report. World Health Organization, 2019.
  4. Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2007;5(4):345-351. [PMID: 18179993]
  5. Wallis KA, Elley CR, Moyes SA, Lee A, Hikaka JF, Kerse NM. Safer Prescribing and Care for the Elderly (SPACE): a cluster randomised controlled trial in general practice. BJGP open 2022;6(1).
  6. Galimberti F, Casula M, Scotti L, et al. Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing among Elderly Outpatients: Evaluation of Temporal Trends 2012���2018 in Piedmont, Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19(6):3612. [PMID: 35329299]
  7. Brooks CF, Argyropoulos A, Matheson-Monnet CB, Kryl D. Evaluating the impact of a polypharmacy Action Learning Sets tool on healthcare practitioners��� confidence, perceptions and experiences of stopping inappropriate medicines. BMC Med Educ 2022;22(1):1-15.
  8. Li Y, Zhang X, Yang L, et al. Association between polypharmacy and mortality in the older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2022:104630. [PMID: 35101709]
  9. Haerdtlein A, Boehmer AM, Karsten Dafonte K, Rottenkolber M, Jaehde U, Dreischulte T. Prioritisation of adverse drug events leading to hospital admission and occurring during hospitalisation: a RAND survey. J Clin Med 2022;11(15):4254. [PMID: 35893345]
  10. Rankin A, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018(9).
  11. Reeve E, Shakib S, Hendrix I, Roberts MS, Wiese MD. Review of deprescribing processes and development of an evidence���based, patient���centred deprescribing process. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014;78(4):738-747. [PMID: 24661192]
  12. Secora A, Alexander GC, Ballew SH, Coresh J, Grams ME. Kidney Function, Polypharmacy, and Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in a Community-Based Cohort of Older Adults. Drugs Aging 2018;35(8):735-750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-018-0563-1 .
  13. Schiff GD, Galanter WL. Promoting more conservative prescribing. JAMA 2009;301(8):865-867. [PMID: 19244196]
  14. Schiff GD, Galanter WL, Duhig J, Lodolce AE, Koronkowski MJ, Lambert BL. Principles of conservative prescribing. Arch Int Med 2011;171(16):1433-1440. [PMID: 21670331]
  15. Marcum ZA, Gellad WF. Medication adherence to multi-drug regimens. Clin Geriatr Med 2012;28(2):287. [PMID: 22500544]
  16. Gautam CS, Saha L. Fixed Dose Drug Combinations (FDCs): Rational or Irrational: a View Point. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;65(5):795-6. (In eng). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03089.x . [PMID: 18294326]
  17. Patel RI, Beckett RD. Evaluation of resources for analyzing drug interactions. J Med Lib Assoc JMLA 2016;104(4):290. [PMID: 27822150]
  18. Joseph P, Roshandel G, Gao P, et al. Fixed-Dose Combination Therapies With and Without Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: an Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis. The Lancet 2021;398(10306):1133-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01827-4 .
  19. Abushouk AI, Sayed A, Munir M, et al. Fixed-Dose Combination (Polypill) for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Meta-Analysis. Am J Prev Med 2022;63(3):440-449. (In eng). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.03.027 . [PMID: 35613977]
  20. Galanter W, Eguale T, Gellad W, et al. Personal formularies of primary care physicians across 4 health care systems. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4(7):e2117038-e2117038. [PMID: 34264328]
  21. Psaty BM, Breckenridge AM. Mini-Sentinel and Regulatory Science--big Data Rendered Fit and Functional. New England J Med 2014;370(23):2165-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1401664 . [PMID: 24897081]
  22. Lauffenburger JC, Landon JE, Fischer MA. Effect of Combination Therapy on Adherence Among US Patients Initiating Therapy for Hypertension: a Cohort Study. J Gen Int Med 2017;32(6):619-625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3972-z . [PMID: 28050754]
  23. Gellad WF, Grenard JL, Marcum ZA. A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2011;9(1):11-23. [PMID: 21459305]
  24. Gaziano TA, Opie LH, Weinstein MC. Cardiovascular Disease Prevention With a Multidrug Regimen in the Developing World: a Cost-effectiveness Analysis. Lancet 2006;368(9536):679-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69252-0 . [PMID: 16920473]
  25. Jahangiri R, Rezapour A, Malekzadeh R, Olyaeemanesh A, Roshandel G, Motevalian SA. Cost-Effectiveness of Fixed-dose Combination Pill (Polypill) in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. PLoS One 2022;17(7):e0271908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271908 . [PMID: 35901100]
  26. Ooi K. The Pitfalls of Overtreatment: Why More Care is not Necessarily Beneficial. Asian Bioeth Rev 2020;12(4):399-417. (In eng). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-020-00145-z . [PMID: 33717342]
  27. Berwick DM. Avoiding overuse—the next quality frontier. The Lancet 2017;390(10090):102-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32570-3 .
  28. Oduola WO, Li X, Duan C, Qian L, Wu F, Dougherty ER. Time-Based Switching Control of Genetic Regulatory Networks: Toward Sequential Drug Intake for Cancer Therapy. Cancer Info 2017;16:1176935117706888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1176935117706888 .
  29. Oh M, Merrill DP, Sutton L, Hirsch MS. Sequential Versus Simultaneous Combination Antiretroviral Regimens for the Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection in Vitro. J Infect Dis 1997;176(2):510-4. https://doi.org/10.1086/517277 . [PMID: 9237720]
  30. Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE. What is Polypharmacy? A Systematic Review of Definitions. BMC Geriatr 2017;17(1):230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2 . [PMID: 29017448]
  31. Foucquier J, Guedj M. Analysis of drug combinations: current methodological landscape. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2015;3(3):e00149.
  32. Podolsky SH, Greene JA. Combination drugs���hype, harm, and hope. New England J Med 2011;365(6):488-491. [PMID: 21830965]
  33. Barrett, A. K., et al. Latent class analysis of prescribing behavior of primary care physicians in the veterans health administration. J Gen Intern Med 2022;37(13): 3346-3354. [PMID: 34993865]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PCPsmultiplenewprescriptionsprescribingevidenceconcurrentlystarttimemedicationspercentageconservativeprescribersoftendescribefrequentlysupportinginitiatingstudyfoursiteswroteVAsiteencountersconcurrentdrugstartsNW7%BWH16UIC0%prescribed115%8%frequent0startingtakentogetherpotentiallyOftenBACKGROUND:growingawarenessneedcautiousOneprincipleurgeswheneverpossibleonemedicationLittleknownprimarycarephysiciansneededOBJECTIVE:evaluatenecessityPCPclinicalsites'variabilityDESIGN:RetrospectivecohortPARTICIPANTS:January2017-December2018MAINMEASURES:FrequencytwosessionKEYRESULTS:Across46467849914VeteransAdministrationhighest272%followedNorthwestern19BrighamWomen'sHospital1%UniversityIllinoisChicago14WithinwidevariationamongInterquartilerangevaried:0-18151-22%0-15229-31Reviewingcombinations6%strongdrugseitherrecommendedreasonablesimultaneously71smallerproblematic104%contraindicateddueoverlappingsideeffectsdrug-druginteractionsCONCLUSIONS:startedwithoutcompellingnotablevariationsacrossinstitutionsAlthoughconductdetailedchartreviewencounterclassificationpairssuggestsopportunitiesimprovesafetyStartingTwoDrugsConcurrentlyPrimaryCare:DoneNeeded?

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.