OpenLB
Open Library of Bioscience
Advanced Search
European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society
Apr 03, 2025;51 (1): 159.

Hemorrhage control in pelvic ring injuries: the role of PCCDs and other acute measures in Germany.

Felix Metzger, A Höch, S C Herath, S Buschbeck, S F Huber, U Schweigkofler, Working Group on Pelvic Fractures of the German Trauma Society
Author Information
  1. Felix Metzger: Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. felix.metzger@bgu-frankfurt.de.
  2. A Höch: Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  3. S C Herath: Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Tuebingen, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
  4. S Buschbeck: Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  5. S F Huber: AUC - Academy for Trauma Surgery (AUC), Munich, Germany.
  6. U Schweigkofler: Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Unfallklinik Frankfurt, Friedberger Landstrasse 430, 60389, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
PMID: 40178683 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-025-02836-4

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Partially unstable- and unstable pelvic ring injuries (PRI) can result in massive hemorrhage. Early detection and appropriate management are of utmost importance. This retrospective study, utilizing data from the German Pelvis Registry (GPR), evaluates bleeding complications (BC), the effect of pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCDs) on transfusion requirements and outcomes, and the role of acute measures such as pelvic clamps, external fixators, pelvic tamponade and embolization.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria: Adults (≥ 17 and ≤ 64 years) with partially unstable or unstable PRI (Tile type B and C), with (BC) or without bleeding complications (nBC) recorded in the GPR between July 2018 and February 2023. BC was defined as significant pelvis-related bleeding requiring blood transfusions and/or resulting in systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg. Bleeding complications were identified by transfusions within 3 h of admission, the occurrence of bleeding during the hospital stay, or pre-hospital/ER systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Patients ≤ 17 or ≥ 64 years, Tile type A-, acetabular-, combined pelvic-acetabular injuries, and inter-hospital transfers.
RESULTS: Of 477 cases, 335 (70.2%) met inclusion criteria, with 133 (39.7%) having bleeding complications (BC) and 202 (60.3%) without (nBC). BC occurred more frequently in patients with Tile types B2-C3 injuries, who also had more concomitant injuries, higher ISS, NISS, and RISC II scores. These patients required more blood transfusions during admission and surgery, had longer ICU and hospital stays, and had worse outcomes with higher mortality rates (21.1%). Most patients with bleeding complications (BC) were stabilized with a PCCD (85%). Those with a PCCD had higher ISS but did not require more blood transfusions compared to patients without a PCCD. There were no differences in ICU or hospital stay duration, though outcomes were worse; however, mortality (23%) was not significantly higher. Pelvic tamponade was performed in 3.8% of cases, and embolization in 0.8%, both deemed 100% effective. Stabilization was done in 57.6% of cases, with pelvic clamps applied in 1.5% in the ER and 6.8% in the OR. External fixators were used in 48.9%, percutaneous osteosynthesis in 8.3%, open osteosynthesis in 2.3%, and combined measures in 12.8%. Effectiveness rates were 77.8% for pelvic clamps, 93.8% for external fixators, 100% for percutaneous osteosynthesis, and 66.7% for open osteosynthesis.
CONCLUSION: Bleeding complications occurred in 39.7%, mostly in Tile B2-C3 injuries, with 85% receiving PCCD stabilization. Mortality and transfusion rates were similar to those without PCCD, indicating that injury severity and surgical care quality were more impactful than PCCD use. External fixators were the most commonly used measure and demonstrated high effectiveness. While less frequent, pelvic tamponade and embolization also proved to be effective.

Keywords

Bleeding Emergency medicine German pelvis registry Hemorrhage Pelvic circumferential compression device Pelvic ring injury

References

  1. Trentzsch H, Lefering R, Schweigkofler U, TraumaRegister DGU. Imposter or knight in shining armor? Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCD) for severe pelvic injuries in patients with multiple trauma: a trauma-registry analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024;32(1):2. [PMID: 38225602]
  2. Marson AC, Grion CM, Ferreira Filho OF, Thomson JC. Preventable deaths in trauma patients associated with Non adherence to management guidelines. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2010;22(3):220–8. [PMID: 25302427]
  3. Kleber C, Giesecke MT, Tsokos M, Haas NP, Buschmann CT. Trauma-related preventable deaths in Berlin 2010: need to change prehospital management strategies and trauma management education. World J Surg. 2013;37(5):1154–61. [PMID: 23430005]
  4. Rossler A, Lukhaup L, Seidelmann M, Gaeth C, Dietz SO, Audretsch C et al. Hemorrhage in pelvic ring fractures after Low-Energy trauma: A systematic review. J Clin Med. 2024;13(23).
  5. Committee on Emergency Medicine I, of CaTMSN, (AUC) tGTSDA-AfTS. General Annual Report 2024 - TraumaRegister DGU (TR-DGU) 2024 [Available from: https://www.auc-online.de/fileadmin/AUC/Dokumente/Register/TraumaRegister_DGU/TR-DGU-Jahresbericht_2024.pdf
  6. Schweigkofler U, Wohlrath B, Paffrath T, Flohe S, Wincheringer D, Hoffmann R, et al. [Recommendations for releasing the pelvic binder after a Non-Invasive pelvic stabilisation procedure under emergency room conditions]. Z Orthop Unfall. 2016;154(5):470–6. [PMID: 27294481]
  7. Wohlrath B, Trentzsch H, Hoffmann R, Kremer M, Schmidt-Horlohe K, Schweigkofler U. [Preclinical and clinical treatment of instable pelvic injuries: results of an online survey]. Der Unfallchirurg. 2016;119(9):755–62. [PMID: 25412858]
  8. Marmor M, El Naga AN, Barker J, Matz J, Stergiadou S, Miclau T. Management of pelvic ring injury patients with hemodynamic instability. Front Surg. 2020;7:588845. [PMID: 33282907]
  9. Carvalho Mota MT, Goldfinger VP, Lokerman R, Terra M, Azijli K, Schober P, et al. Prehospital accuracy of (H)EMS pelvic ring injury assessment and the application of non-invasive pelvic binder devices. Injury. 2023;54(4):1163–8. [PMID: 36801132]
  10. Tan EC, van Stigt SF, van Vugt AB. Effect of a new pelvic stabilizer (T-POD(R)) on reduction of pelvic volume and haemodynamic stability in unstable pelvic fractures. Injury. 2010;41(12):1239–43. [PMID: 21374905]
  11. Nunn T, Cosker TD, Bose D, Pallister I. Immediate application of improvised pelvic binder as first step in extended resuscitation from life-threatening hypovolaemic shock in conscious patients with unstable pelvic injuries. Injury. 2007;38(1):125–8. [PMID: 16996515]
  12. Pereira SJ, O’Brien DP, Luchette FA, Choe KA, Lim E, Davis K Jr., et al. Dynamic helical computed tomography scan accurately detects hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. Surgery. 2000;128(4):678–85. [PMID: 11015102]
  13. Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Savage SA, Wood GW 2nd, Fabian TC. Emergent pelvic fixation in patients with exsanguinating pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(5):935–9. discussion 40– 2. [PMID: 17481514]
  14. Ono S, Miyata S, Suzuki H, Shimizu K. Effectiveness of pelvic circumferential compression device for lower body trauma: insights from a Japan trauma data bank retrospective study. Acute Med Surg. 2024;11(1):e983. [PMID: 39045517]
  15. Klingebiel FK, Hasegawa M, Parry J, Balogh ZJ, Sen RK, Kalbas Y, et al. Standard practice in the treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries: an international survey. Int Orthop. 2023;47(9):2301–18. [PMID: 37328569]
  16. Lefering R, Huber-Wagner S, Nienaber U, Maegele M, Bouillon B. Update of the trauma risk adjustment model of the traumaregister DGU: the revised injury severity classification, version II. Crit Care. 2014;18(5):476. [PMID: 25394596]
  17. Tosounidis TI, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic fractures presenting with haemodynamic instability: treatment options and outcomes. Surgeon. 2013;11(6):344–51. [PMID: 23932669]
  18. Valisena S, Abboud AE, Andereggen E, Ansorge A, Gamulin A. Management of high-energy blunt pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective cohort study evaluating an institutional protocol. Injury. 2022;53(12):4054–61. [PMID: 36195515]
  19. Stahel PF, Ziran N. The pathophysiology of pelvic ring injuries: a review. Patient Saf Surg. 2024;18(1):16. [PMID: 38741186]
  20. Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G, Biffl W, Horer TM, Catena F, et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World J Emerg Surg. 2017;12:5. [PMID: 28115984]
  21. Stahel PF, Burlew CC, Moore EE. Current trends in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic ring injuries. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23(6):511–9. [PMID: 29095714]
  22. Baque P, Trojani C, Delotte J, Sejor E, Senni-Buratti M, de Baque F, et al. Anatomical consequences of open-book pelvic ring disruption: a cadaver experimental study. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27(6):487–90. [PMID: 16311717]
  23. Stover MD, Summers HD, Ghanayem AJ, Wilber JH. Three-dimensional analysis of pelvic volume in an unstable pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2006;61(4):905–8. [PMID: 17033560]
  24. Costantini TW, Coimbra R, Holcomb JB, Podbielski JM, Catalano RD, Blackburn A, et al. Pelvic fracture pattern predicts the need for hemorrhage control intervention-Results of an AAST multi-institutional study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;82(6):1030–8. [PMID: 28520685]
  25. Blum L, Hake ME, Charles R, Conlan T, Rojas D, Martin MT, et al. Vertical shear pelvic injury: evaluation, management, and fixation strategies. Int Orthop. 2018;42(11):2663–74. [PMID: 29582114]
  26. Giannoudis PV, Grotz MR, Tzioupis C, Dinopoulos H, Wells GE, Bouamra O, et al. Prevalence of pelvic fractures, associated injuries, and mortality: the united Kingdom perspective. J Trauma. 2007;63(4):875–83. [PMID: 18090020]
  27. Coleman JR, Moore EE, Vintimilla DR, Parry J, Nelson JT, Samuels JM, et al. Association between Young-Burgess pelvic ring injury classification and concomitant injuries requiring urgent intervention. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(6):1099–103. [PMID: 33192014]
  28. Devaney GL, Tarrant SM, Weaver N, King KL, Balogh ZJ. Major pelvic ring injuries: fewer transfusions without deaths from bleeding during the last decade. World J Surg. 2023;47(5):1136–43. [PMID: 36648519]
  29. Hoch A, Zeidler S, Pieroh P, Josten C, Stuby FM, Herath SC, et al. Trends and efficacy of external emergency stabilization of pelvic ring fractures: results from the German pelvic trauma registry. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021;47(2):523–31. [PMID: 31119322]
  30. Benning D, Hackenberg L, Pavlu F, Weber W, Franke A, Kollig E, et al. New recommendations for the care of severely injured patients: revision of the S3 guideline on treatment of polytrauma/severe injuries. Z Orthop Unfall; 2024.
  31. Kuner V, van Veelen N, Studer S, Van de Wall B, Fornaro J, Stickel M et al. Application of pelvic circumferential compression devices in pelvic ring Fractures-Are guidelines followed in daily practice?? J Clin Med. 2021;10(6).
  32. Bangura A, Burke CE, Enobun B, O’Hara NN, Gary JL, Floccare D, et al. Are Pelvic Binders Effective Prehospital Intervention? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(1):24–30. [PMID: 34874811]
  33. Zingg T, Piaget-Rossel R, Steppacher J, Carron PN, Dami F, Borens O, et al. Prehospital use of pelvic circumferential compression devices in a physician-based emergency medical service: A 6-year retrospective cohort study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5106. [PMID: 32198451]
  34. Berger-Groch J, Rueger JM, Czorlich P, Frosch KH, Lefering R, Hoffmann M, et al. Evaluation of pelvic circular compression devices in severely injured trauma patients with pelvic fractures. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26(4):547–55. [PMID: 34152927]
  35. Rungsinaporn V, Akkarawanit P, Kongmalai P. Benefits of early application of pelvic circumferential compression device to reduce bleeding in pelvic fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):203. [PMID: 35241032]
  36. Fu CY, Wu YT, Liao CH, Kang SC, Wang SY, Hsu YP, et al. Pelvic circumferential compression devices benefit patients with pelvic fractures who need transfers. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(10):1432–6. [PMID: 23972479]
  37. Audretsch CK, Mader D, Bahrs C, Trulson A, Hoch A, Herath SC, et al. Comparison of pelvic C-clamp and pelvic binder for emergency stabilization and bleeding control in type-C pelvic ring fractures. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2338. [PMID: 33504874]
  38. Salati SA. Extraperitoneal pelvic packing in trauma a review. Pol Przegl Chir. 2022;95(3):1–5. [PMID: 36805990]
  39. Hundersmarck D, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, Heng M. Pelvic packing and angio-embolization after blunt pelvic trauma: a retrospective 18-year analysis. Injury. 2021;52(4):946–55. [PMID: 33223257]
  40. Lustenberger T, Stormann P, Eichler K, Nau C, Janko M, Marzi I. Secondary Angio-Embolization after emergent pelvic stabilization and pelvic packing is a safe option for patients with persistent hemorrhage from unstable pelvic ring injuries. Front Surg. 2020;7:601140. [PMID: 33392246]
  41. Lustenberger T, Wutzler S, Stormann P, Laurer H, Marzi I. The role of angio-embolization in the acute treatment concept of severe pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 4):S33–8. [PMID: 26542864]
  42. Klingebiel FK, Kalbas Y, Klee O, Long A, Teuben M, Teuber H, et al. Efficacy and outcomes of rescue screws in unstable pelvic ring injuries - A retrospective matched cohort study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024;50(6):2987–97. [PMID: 39190065]

MeSH Term

Humans
Pelvic Bones
Germany
Male
Female
Retrospective Studies
Adult
Middle Aged
Hemorrhage
Blood Transfusion
Fractures, Bone
Registries
Hemostatic Techniques
Embolization, Therapeutic
Young Adult
External Fixators
Adolescent
Journal Article

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0pelvicbleedingcomplicationsBCPCCD8%injuriesbloodfixatorsTilewithouttransfusionspatientshigherosteosynthesisunstableringoutcomesmeasuresclampstamponadeembolizationBleedinghospitalcases7%3%ratesPelvicPRIGermanGPRcircumferentialcompressionPCCDstransfusionroleacuteexternalyearstypenBCsystolicpressure < 100mmHgadmissionstaycombined39occurredB2-C3alsoISSICUworsemortality85%100%effectiveExternalusedpercutaneousopeninjuryHemorrhageBACKGROUND/PURPOSE:Partiallyunstable-canresultmassivehemorrhageEarlydetectionappropriatemanagementutmostimportanceretrospectivestudyutilizingdataPelvisRegistryevaluateseffectdevicesrequirementsMETHODS:Inclusioncriteria:Adults≥ 17≤ 64partiallyBCrecordedJuly2018February2023definedsignificantpelvis-relatedrequiringand/orresultingidentifiedwithin3 hoccurrencepre-hospital/EREXCLUSIONCRITERIA:Patients ≤ 17≥ 64A-acetabular-pelvic-acetabularinter-hospitaltransfersRESULTS:477335702%metinclusioncriteria13320260frequentlytypesconcomitantNISSRISCIIscoresrequiredsurgerylongerstays211%stabilizedrequirecompareddifferencesdurationthoughhowever23%significantlyperformed30deemedStabilizationdone576%applied15%ER6OR489%8212Effectiveness779366CONCLUSION:mostlyreceivingstabilizationMortalitysimilarindicatingseveritysurgicalcarequalityimpactfulusecommonlymeasuredemonstratedhigheffectivenesslessfrequentprovedcontrolinjuries:GermanyEmergencymedicinepelvisregistrydevice

Similar Articles

Cited By