Comparison of susceptibilities of anaerobic bacteria determined by agar dilution and by a microbroth method.

E J Baron, D A Bruckner
Author Information

Abstract

The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 110 anaerobic bacteria (84% fresh clinical isolates) to nine antimicrobial agents were determined simultaneously by the tentative reference agar-dilution method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards and a prototype commercial microbroth panel (Microscan). MICs (determined visually for either system) differed by greater than 1 log2 dilution in 17% of all tests. With the exceptions of the MICs of tetracycline and moxalactam, however, all compared antimicrobial MICs were within 1 log2 dilution for at least 82% of all tests. Twenty-three anaerobic bacterial strains (21%) failed to grow in the microdilution panel (Wilkins-Chalgren broth), and seven strains (6%) failed to grow on the reference Wilkins-Chalgren agar. However, for those bacterial strains that could be tested, the microbroth panel appeared to be less cumbersome than the agar-dilution procedure for susceptibility testing of anaerobic microorganisms.

MeSH Term

Agar
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Bacteria, Anaerobic
Bacteroidaceae
Clostridium
Metronidazole
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Peptococcaceae

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Metronidazole
Agar

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MICsanaerobicdeterminedmicrobrothpaneldilutionstrainsbacteriaantimicrobialreferenceagar-dilutionmethod1log2testsbacterialfailedgrowWilkins-Chalgrenagarminimalinhibitoryconcentrations11084%freshclinicalisolatesnineagentssimultaneouslytentativeNationalCommitteeClinicalLaboratoryStandardsprototypecommercialMicroscanvisuallyeithersystemdifferedgreater17%exceptionstetracyclinemoxalactamhowevercomparedwithinleast82%Twenty-three21%microdilutionbrothseven6%HowevertestedappearedlesscumbersomeproceduresusceptibilitytestingmicroorganismsComparisonsusceptibilities

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)