Competitive short-term and long-term memory processes in spatial habituation.

David J Sanderson, David M Bannerman
Author Information
  1. David J Sanderson: Department of Experimental Psychology,University of Oxford,South Parks Road, Oxford OX13UD, UK. david.sanderson@psy.ox.ac.uk

Abstract

Exposure to a spatial location leads to habituation of exploration such that, in a novelty preference test, rodents subsequently prefer exploring a novel location to the familiar location. According to Wagner's (1981) theory of memory, short-term and long-term habituation are caused by separate and sometimes opponent processes. In the present study, this dual-process account of memory was tested. Mice received a series of exposure training trials to a location before receiving a novelty preference test. The novelty preference was greater when tested after a short, rather than a long, interval. In contrast, the novelty preference was weaker when exposure training trials were separated by a short, rather than a long interval. Furthermore, it was found that long-term habituation was determined by the independent effects of the amount of exposure training and the number of exposure training trials when factors such as the intertrial interval and the cumulative intertrial interval were controlled. A final experiment demonstrated that a long-term reduction of exploration could be caused by a negative priming effect due to associations formed during exploration. These results provide evidence against a single-process account of habituation and suggest that spatial habituation is determined by both short-term, recency-based memory and long-term, incrementally strengthened memory.

References

  1. Science. 1972 Jan 28;175(4020):451-4 [PMID: 17731371]
  2. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Oct;10(10):455-63 [PMID: 16935547]
  3. Psychol Rev. 1966 Jan;73(1):16-43 [PMID: 5324565]
  4. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2000 Feb;53(1):1-23 [PMID: 10718058]
  5. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1952 Jun;45(3):287-93 [PMID: 14946277]
  6. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2000 Apr;10(2):200-4 [PMID: 10753791]
  7. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jan;26(1):3-14 [PMID: 10650540]
  8. Behav Neurosci. 2004 Aug;118(4):785-97 [PMID: 15301604]
  9. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Nov;8(11):872-83 [PMID: 17948032]
  10. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Jun;45(6):387-93 [PMID: 13052878]
  11. Behav Res Ther. 1987;25(2):81-97 [PMID: 3593171]
  12. Behav Processes. 2008 Jul;78(3):481-6 [PMID: 18358637]
  13. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):217-31 [PMID: 20384402]
  14. Learn Mem. 2009 May 23;16(6):379-86 [PMID: 19470654]
  15. Learn Behav. 2004 May;32(2):220-9 [PMID: 15281394]
  16. Q J Exp Psychol B. 2005 Jul-Oct;58(3-4):218-33 [PMID: 16194966]
  17. J Exp Psychol. 1974 Oct;103(4):802-4 [PMID: 4448972]
  18. Psychol Rev. 1970 Sep;77(5):419-50 [PMID: 4319167]
  19. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1993 Jan;19(1):90-7 [PMID: 8418219]
  20. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jan;59(1):77-99 [PMID: 16556560]
  21. Behav Neurosci. 2007 Jun;121(3):559-69 [PMID: 17592947]
  22. J Neurosci. 1998 Mar 15;18(6):2226-30 [PMID: 9482806]
  23. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Oct;7(4):295-312 [PMID: 7288366]
  24. Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):289-344 [PMID: 10789198]
  25. Behav Brain Res. 1988 Nov 1;31(1):47-59 [PMID: 3228475]
  26. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Aug;72(2):177-92 [PMID: 5489452]

Grants

  1. /Wellcome Trust
  2. 074385/Wellcome Trust
  3. 087736/Wellcome Trust

MeSH Term

Analysis of Variance
Animals
Behavior, Animal
Exploratory Behavior
Female
Habituation, Psychophysiologic
Maze Learning
Memory, Long-Term
Memory, Short-Term
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Reaction Time
Recognition, Psychology
Spatial Behavior
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0habituationmemorylong-termlocationnoveltypreferenceexposuretrainingintervalspatialexplorationshort-termtrialstestcausedprocessesaccounttestedshortratherlongdeterminedintertrialExposureleadsrodentssubsequentlypreferexploringnovelfamiliarAccordingWagner's1981theoryseparatesometimesopponentpresentstudydual-processMicereceivedseriesreceivinggreatercontrastweakerseparatedFurthermorefoundindependenteffectsamountnumberfactorscumulativecontrolledfinalexperimentdemonstratedreductionnegativeprimingeffectdueassociationsformedresultsprovideevidencesingle-processsuggestrecency-basedincrementallystrengthenedCompetitive

Similar Articles

Cited By (20)