Utility of an ADL index for institutionalized elderly people: Examining possible applications for independent elderly people.

S Demura, S Sato, M Minami
Author Information
  1. S Demura: Faculty of Education, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify the application range and utility of an ADL index for disabled elderly people (Demura et al., 2000), by examining the ADL characteristics of an elderly population when this index was applied to disabled and independent elderly people. Subjects of this study were 697 Japanese institutionalized disabled elderly people and 482 independent elderly people (ID) living at home. Disabled elderly people were classified into four groups based on condition of use of assisting devices for movement; D1 did not use assisting devices; D2 used a stick or a walker; D3 used a wheelchair; D4 was immobile. From the findings of comparing achievement proportions, ADL score and the distribution of total score among elderly groups, it was suggested that this ADL index can assess gradually from disabled elderly people who cannot move to independent elderly people. Since this index classifies independent elderly people and disabled elderly people with high probability, it can evaluate if elderly people can maintain a functional level needed for independent living, and can recognize the symptoms of disability. Furthermore, this study proposed useful activities to discriminate the functional level for each elderly group. Although it is important to comprehensively assess ADL ability, further use of this ADL index to discriminate the functional level of an elderly population, by making use of these useful activities, is expected.

Keywords

References

  1. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5 [PMID: 14258950]
  2. JAMA. 1963 Sep 21;185:914-9 [PMID: 14044222]
  3. Gerontologist. 1969 Autumn;9(3):179-86 [PMID: 5349366]
  4. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18 [PMID: 3503663]
  5. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):1299-305 [PMID: 7490592]
  6. Gerontologist. 1990 Aug;30(4):497-502 [PMID: 2394384]
  7. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1968 Apr;49(4):221-9 [PMID: 5647959]
  8. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(6):481-9 [PMID: 3597653]
  9. Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi. 2000 Oct;55(3):538-46 [PMID: 11215139]
  10. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Aug;38(8):855-61 [PMID: 2387949]
  11. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 1999 Jan;46(1):25-34 [PMID: 10222611]
  12. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 1992 Nov;29(11):841-8 [PMID: 1491480]
  13. Appl Human Sci. 1999 Sep;18(5):169-74 [PMID: 10584396]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0elderlypeopleADLindependentindexdisabledusecanstudyfunctionallevelpopulationJapaneseinstitutionalizedlivinggroupsassistingdevicesusedscoreassessusefulactivitiesdiscriminatepurposeclarifyapplicationrangeutilityDemuraetal2000examiningcharacteristicsappliedSubjects697482IDhomeDisabledclassifiedfourbasedconditionmovementD1D2stickwalkerD3wheelchairD4immobilefindingscomparingachievementproportionsdistributiontotalamongsuggestedgraduallymoveSinceclassifieshighprobabilityevaluatemaintainneededrecognizesymptomsdisabilityFurthermoreproposedgroupAlthoughimportantcomprehensivelyabilitymakingexpectedUtilitypeople:Examiningpossibleapplicationsdiscriminantanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)