Socioeconomic health disparities revisited: coping flexibility enhances health-related quality of life for individuals low in socioeconomic status.

Saloni Atal, Cecilia Cheng
Author Information
  1. Saloni Atal: Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
  2. Cecilia Cheng: Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. ceci-cheng@hku.hk.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous research has generally indicated that disadvantaged socioeconomic groups tend to experience poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). In an effort to extend the literature, this study proposes that coping flexibility is a stress buffer that mitigates the adverse effects of low socioeconomic status (SES).
METHODS: The participants comprised 150 Indians (53 % women; mean age = 36.38 years) from high, medium and low socioeconomic groups. Their levels of perceived stress, coping flexibility, subjective SES and HRQoL were assessed individually through household interviews.
RESULTS: The findings provide support for the hypothesised moderating role of coping flexibility between subjective SES and HRQoL (p < 0.001). In the low SES group, participants higher in coping flexibility reported significantly better HRQoL than those lower in coping flexibility. Moreover, coping flexibility moderated the association between perceived stress and HRQoL (p = 0.001). Of the participants who experienced higher levels of stress, those higher in coping flexibility reported better HRQoL than those lower in coping flexibility.
CONCLUSIONS: This study enriches the literature by revealing the beneficial role of coping flexibility on HRQoL among individuals low in SES. These new findings highlight the potential importance of psychological interventions that strengthen the flexible coping skills of socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.

References

  1. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Sep;53(3):763-73 [PMID: 12217450]
  2. Eur J Public Health. 2009 Aug;19(4):412-7 [PMID: 19389863]
  3. Psychol Bull. 2003 Jan;129(1):10-51 [PMID: 12555793]
  4. Chin J Cancer Res. 2011 Mar;23(1):54-8 [PMID: 23467708]
  5. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;18(5):269-274 [PMID: 22210579]
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):814-30 [PMID: 17983302]
  7. J Pers. 2009 Apr;77(2):471-94 [PMID: 19220723]
  8. Psychiatry Res. 2015 Dec 15;230(2):137-42 [PMID: 26342281]
  9. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2005 Jul;3(4):557-71 [PMID: 16038646]
  10. Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):568-73 [PMID: 18783391]
  11. Psychosom Med. 1999 Nov-Dec;61(6):789-95 [PMID: 10593630]
  12. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Mar;74(3):763-73 [PMID: 9523418]
  13. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2008 Jan;21(1):3-14 [PMID: 18027121]
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):425-38 [PMID: 12585814]
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):814-33 [PMID: 11374752]
  16. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):60-76 [PMID: 11900187]
  17. Psychosom Med. 2012 Feb-Mar;74(2):178-86 [PMID: 22286848]
  18. Soc Sci Med. 2008 Aug;67(3):368-79 [PMID: 18433961]
  19. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:679-704 [PMID: 19572784]
  20. J Health Psychol. 2010 May;15(4):560-74 [PMID: 20460413]
  21. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Feb;84(2):365-76 [PMID: 12585810]
  22. Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):1003-12 [PMID: 14651418]
  23. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:377-401 [PMID: 17716061]
  24. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1096 [PMID: 23253581]
  25. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Nov;128(5):970-6 [PMID: 21824649]
  26. Psychooncology. 2012 Feb;21(2):211-8 [PMID: 22271542]
  27. Omega (Westport). 2010;61(4):273-89 [PMID: 21058610]
  28. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:518 [PMID: 20799956]
  29. Am J Public Health. 2008 May;98(5):889-96 [PMID: 18382003]
  30. Psychosom Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;66(4):553-8 [PMID: 15272102]
  31. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 May;109(2):205-13 [PMID: 10895558]
  32. Health Psychol. 2010 Nov;29(6):626-35 [PMID: 20954777]
  33. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:131-44 [PMID: 10681894]
  34. Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1582-607 [PMID: 25222637]
  35. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov;8(6):591-612 [PMID: 26173226]
  36. Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92 [PMID: 11129362]
  37. Psychosom Med. 2007 Jan;69(1):81-8 [PMID: 17167126]
  38. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(2):247-61 [PMID: 23713698]
  39. Lancet. 2011 Feb 5;377(9764):505-15 [PMID: 21227492]
  40. Int J Behav Med. 2013 Mar;20(1):148-58 [PMID: 22200973]

MeSH Term

Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Attitude to Health
Female
Health Status Disparities
Humans
India
Male
Middle Aged
Quality of Life
Social Class
Socioeconomic Factors
Stress, Psychological
White People

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0copingflexibilityHRQoLlowSESsocioeconomicstressgroupsparticipantshigherdisadvantagedhealth-relatedqualitylifeliteraturestudystatus=levelsperceivedsubjectivefindingsrolep0001reportedbetterlowerindividualsBACKGROUND:PreviousresearchgenerallyindicatedtendexperiencepooreffortextendproposesbuffermitigatesadverseeffectsMETHODS:comprised150Indians53%womenmeanage3638yearshighmediumassessedindividuallyhouseholdinterviewsRESULTS:providesupporthypothesisedmoderating<groupsignificantlyMoreovermoderatedassociationexperiencedCONCLUSIONS:enrichesrevealingbeneficialamongnewhighlightpotentialimportancepsychologicalinterventionsstrengthenflexibleskillssocioeconomicallySocioeconomichealthdisparitiesrevisited:enhances

Similar Articles

Cited By (16)