The impact of food preservation on food waste.

Wayne Martindale, Walter Schiebel
Author Information
  1. Wayne Martindale: National Centre for Food Manufacturing, Food Insights and Sustainability Service, University of Lincoln, Holbeach, UK. ORCID
  2. Walter Schiebel: Institute for Marketing and Innovation, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria.

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate the relationship between food preservation and reducing consumer waste is of value in developing sustainable meal options. The research reports insights into Austrian marketplace for frozen and fresh foods that have been obtained from a consumer survey.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The consumer survey methodologies indicate how preservation can change meal planning and lower food waste across frozen and fresh and ambient food purchases using freezing preservation methods.
FINDINGS: The results show food waste can be reduced by six-fold when frozen foods are compared with fresh foods.
RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: This study highlights the requirement for a greater understanding of the probability that specific foods will be wasted with respect to the frequency of purchase. This is a limitation of the current study that has been investigated by other researchers.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: This research has enabled the identification of different food waste amounts for different food product categories. The data presented could be used to guide food product development so that less consumer waste is produced.
SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS: The research suggests a decision matrix approach can be used to can guide new product development and a model of this matrix is presented so that it may provide fit-for-purpose food preservation options for consumers.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This paper will continue to highlight the overlooked value of food preservation during processing and manufacturing of foods and their preparation in households.

Keywords

References

  1. Waste Manag. 2017 Sep;67:298-307 [PMID: 28511926]
  2. Science. 2014 Jun 6;344(6188):1124-7 [PMID: 24904157]
  3. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013 Feb;72(1):29-39 [PMID: 23336559]
  4. Waste Manag. 2011 Sep-Oct;31(9-10):1924-33 [PMID: 21705207]
  5. Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Feb;76(1):28-33 [PMID: 27296903]
  6. Food Res Int. 2017 Sep;99(Pt 1):58-71 [PMID: 28784520]
  7. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):3065-81 [PMID: 20713403]
  8. Waste Manag Res. 2014 Aug;32(8):683-94 [PMID: 25161274]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodpreservationwastefoodsconsumercanvalueresearchfrozenfreshproductFoodpapermealoptionssurveystudywillIMPLICATIONS:differentpresentedusedguidedevelopmentmatrixPURPOSE:purposedemonstraterelationshipreducingdevelopingsustainablereportsinsightsAustrianmarketplaceobtainedDESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH:methodologiesindicatechangeplanningloweracrossambientpurchasesusingfreezingmethodsFINDINGS:resultsshowreducedsix-foldcomparedRESEARCHLIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS:highlightsrequirementgreaterunderstandingprobabilityspecificwastedrespectfrequencypurchaselimitationcurrentinvestigatedresearchersPRACTICALenabledidentificationamountscategoriesdatalessproducedSOCIALsuggestsdecisionapproachnewmodelmayprovidefit-for-purposeconsumersORIGINALITY/VALUE:continuehighlightoverlookedprocessingmanufacturingpreparationhouseholdsimpactConsumersFrozenSustainability

Similar Articles

Cited By (4)