Not as Stable as We Think: A Descriptive Study of 12 Monthly Assessments of Fear of Cancer Recurrence Among Curatively-Treated Breast Cancer Survivors 0-5 Years After Surgery.

José Ae Custers, Linda Kwakkenbos, Winette Ta van der Graaf, Judith B Prins, Marieke Fm Gielissen, Belinda Thewes
Author Information
  1. José Ae Custers: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  2. Linda Kwakkenbos: Behavioural Science Institute, Clinical Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  3. Winette Ta van der Graaf: Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  4. Judith B Prins: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  5. Marieke Fm Gielissen: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  6. Belinda Thewes: Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Abstract

: Previous studies suggest one-third of Breast Cancer survivors (BCS) experience elevated fear of Cancer recurrence (FCR) and that it remains stable. Most studies include long assessment intervals and aggregated group data. This study aimed to describe the individual trajectories of FCR when assessed monthly using both a statistical and descriptive approach. : Participants were curatively-treated BCS 0-5 years post-surgery. Questionnaire data were collected monthly for 12 months. Primary outcome was FCR [Cancer Worry Scale (CWS)]. For the descriptive approach, 218 participants were classified as low (CWS ≤ 13 at each assessment), high (CWS ≥ 14 at each assessment), or fluctuating FCR (CWS scores above and below cut-off). Latent class growth analysis (LCGA; = 377) was conducted to identify trajectories over time. : Around 58% of the women reported fluctuating CWS scores, 22% reported a consistently high and 21% consistently low course. Results of the LCGA confirmed the three-class approach including a stable high FCR group (13%), a low FCR group (40%), and a moderate FCR group (47%). Both the moderate and low scoring groups reported declining scores over time. Younger patients, higher educated patients, and those less satisfied with the medical treatment were more likely to belong to the moderate or high trajectory. : Assessed monthly, the majority of BCS report fluctuating levels of FCR. Stepped-care models should assess FCR on multiple occasions before offering tailored interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(9):1754-60 [PMID: 27287209]
  2. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2002;20(4):71-94 [PMID: 29016278]
  3. Psychooncology. 2006 Apr;15(4):306-20 [PMID: 16041841]
  4. Psychooncology. 2016 Jan;25(1):51-7 [PMID: 26110652]
  5. Psychooncology. 2006 Sep;15(9):749-58 [PMID: 16304622]
  6. Psychooncology. 2004 Mar;13(3):147-60 [PMID: 15022150]
  7. Cancer Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;37(1):E44-50 [PMID: 23448956]
  8. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Nov 5;100(21):1530-41 [PMID: 18957678]
  9. Health Psychol. 2010 Mar;29(2):160-8 [PMID: 20230089]
  10. BMC Cancer. 2012 May 10;12:173 [PMID: 22574757]
  11. BMC Cancer. 2018 Oct 20;18(1):1002 [PMID: 30342495]
  12. Br J Cancer. 2007 Dec 17;97(12):1625-31 [PMID: 18000503]
  13. J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Feb;11(1):41-47 [PMID: 27412726]
  14. Psychooncology. 2010 Mar;19(3):289-98 [PMID: 19382100]
  15. J Cancer Surviv. 2009 Jun;3(2):117-27 [PMID: 19322661]
  16. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Sep;99(9):1511-8 [PMID: 27378079]
  17. Psychooncology. 1997 Jun;6(2):95-105 [PMID: 9205967]
  18. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2009 Feb;13(1):2-8 [PMID: 19119079]
  19. Psychooncology. 2006 Feb;15(2):143-59 [PMID: 15880638]
  20. Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):1-11 [PMID: 22232030]
  21. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 1;35(19):2173-2183 [PMID: 28471726]
  22. BMC Cancer. 2013 Apr 23;13:201 [PMID: 23617696]
  23. J Psychosom Res. 2013 Apr;74(4):354-60 [PMID: 23497839]
  24. Ann Intern Med. 1991 Apr 15;114(8):657-61 [PMID: 2003712]
  25. Psychooncology. 2018 Jan;27(1):295-301 [PMID: 28727897]
  26. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6172-9 [PMID: 19884548]
  27. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Nov;154(1):105-15 [PMID: 26420401]
  28. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):300-22 [PMID: 23475398]
  29. Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1444-1454 [PMID: 27246348]
  30. Psychooncology. 2008 Nov;17(11):1137-45 [PMID: 18484568]
  31. Health Psychol. 2004 Jul;23(4):407-12 [PMID: 15264977]
  32. Psychooncology. 2009 Jun;18(6):580-8 [PMID: 18855944]
  33. Health Psychol. 2016 Jan;35(1):1-9 [PMID: 26030308]
  34. Health Psychol. 2004 Jan;23(1):3-15 [PMID: 14756598]
  35. Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):39-45 [PMID: 21898655]
  36. Psychooncology. 2014 May;23(5):547-54 [PMID: 24293081]
  37. Psychooncology. 2004 Dec;13(12):867-81 [PMID: 15386796]
  38. Psychooncology. 2012 Jan;21(1):90-9 [PMID: 21132676]
  39. Psychooncology. 2002 Mar-Apr;11(2):93-102 [PMID: 11921325]
  40. J Cancer Surviv. 2016 Aug;10(4):663-73 [PMID: 26782171]
  41. BMC Cancer. 2012 Apr 18;12:150 [PMID: 22510387]
  42. J Psychosom Res. 2007 Sep;63(3):225-32 [PMID: 17719358]
  43. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Mar;17(3):241-51 [PMID: 18414902]
  44. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2033-43 [PMID: 25524004]
  45. Psychooncology. 2017 Dec;26(12):2253-2260 [PMID: 27992680]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FCRCWS:cancergrouplowhighBCSassessmenttrajectoriesmonthlyapproachfluctuatingscoresreportedmoderateCancerstudiesbreastsurvivorsfearrecurrencestabledataindividualdescriptive0-512WorryScaleclassgrowthanalysisLCGAtimeconsistentlypatientsPrevioussuggestone-thirdexperienceelevatedremainsincludelongintervalsaggregatedstudyaimeddescribeassessedusingstatisticalParticipantscuratively-treatedyearspost-surgeryQuestionnairecollectedmonthsPrimaryoutcome[Cancer]218participantsclassified1314cut-offLatent=377conductedidentifyAround58%women22%21%courseResultsconfirmedthree-classincluding13%40%47%scoringgroupsdecliningYoungerhighereducatedlesssatisfiedmedicaltreatmentlikelybelongtrajectoryAssessedmajorityreportlevelsStepped-caremodelsassessmultipleoccasionsofferingtailoredinterventionsStableThink:DescriptiveStudyMonthlyAssessmentsFearRecurrenceAmongCuratively-TreatedBreastSurvivorsYearsSurgerylatentoncology

Similar Articles

Cited By (11)