Exercise modality, but not exercise training, alters the acute effect of exercise on endothelial function in healthy men.

Maxime Boidin, Robert M Erskine, Dick H J Thijssen, Ellen Adele Dawson
Author Information
  1. Maxime Boidin: Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom. ORCID
  2. Robert M Erskine: Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom. ORCID
  3. Dick H J Thijssen: Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  4. Ellen Adele Dawson: Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Abstract

We used a within-subject crossover design to examine the impact of exercise modality, i.e., resistance (RT) and endurance (END), on the acute impact of exercise on endothelial function. Then, we examined whether a 4-wk period of chronic exercise training altered the acute exercise-induced change in endothelial function in healthy individuals. Thirty-four healthy, young men (21 ± 2 yr) reported to our laboratory and completed assessment of endothelial function [using the brachial artery flow-mediated dilation test (FMD)] before and immediately after a single bout of RT (leg-extension) or END (cycling). Subsequently, participants completed a 4-wk period of training (12 sessions), followed by evaluation of the FMD before and after a single bout of exercise. Following a 3-wk washout, participants repeated these experiments with the different exercise modality (in a balanced crossover design). An exercise × modality interaction effect was found ( < 0.001). Post hoc pairwise analyses revealed a decrease in FMD after END ( < 0.001) but not after RT ( = 0.06). Four weeks of exercise training improved resting FMD after END and RT ( = 0.04) but did not alter the acute effect of exercise on FMD (exercise × modality × training effect: = 0.63), an effect independent of the modality of exercise (exercise × training interaction: = 0.46 and = 0.11 in RT and END, respectively). These distinct changes in FMD following acute exercise may relate to the different prolonged physiological responses induced by endurance versus resistance exercise. Specifically, endurance exercise, but not resistance exercise, causes a decrease in brachial artery endothelial function, which was unaffected by 4 wk of chronic exercise training. We found that resistance and endurance exercise modalities lead to different endothelial function responses after a single bout of exercise. Endothelial function increased after an acute bout of resistance exercise, whereas it decreased after an acute bout of endurance exercise. Four weeks of chronic exercise training did not affect the acute endothelial function response.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Brachial Artery
Endothelium, Vascular
Exercise
Exercise Therapy
Humans
Male
Vasodilation

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exercisefunctiontrainingacuteendothelial0modalityFMDresistanceRTenduranceENDbout=×effectchronichealthysingledifferentcrossoverdesignimpact4-wkperiodmencompletedbrachialarteryparticipantsfound<001decreaseFourweeksresponsesusedwithin-subjectexamineieexaminedwhetheralteredexercise-inducedchangeindividualsThirty-fouryoung21 ± 2 yrreportedlaboratoryassessment[usingflow-mediateddilationtest]immediatelyleg-extensioncyclingSubsequently12sessionsfollowedevaluationFollowing3-wkwashoutrepeatedexperimentsbalancedinteractionPosthocpairwiseanalysesrevealed06improvedresting04altereffect:63independentinteraction:4611respectivelydistinctchangesfollowingmayrelateprolongedphysiologicalinducedversusSpecificallycausesunaffected4 wkmodalitiesleadEndothelialincreasedwhereasdecreasedaffectresponseExercisealtersaerobicstrengthtrainabilityvascular

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)