Application of Apparent Metabolizable Energy versus Nitrogen-Corrected Apparent Metabolizable Energy in Poultry Feed Formulations: A Continuing Conundrum.

M Reza Abdollahi, Markus Wiltafsky-Martin, Velmurugu Ravindran
Author Information
  1. M Reza Abdollahi: Monogastric Research Centre, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. ORCID
  2. Markus Wiltafsky-Martin: Evonik Operations GmbH, Animal Nutrition, Rodenbacher Chaussee 4, 63457 Hanau, Germany. ORCID
  3. Velmurugu Ravindran: Monogastric Research Centre, School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.

Abstract

In the present investigation, N retention, AME, and AMEn data from six energy evaluation assays, involving four protein sources (soybean meal, full-fat soybean, rapeseed meal and maize distiller's dried grains with solubles [DDGS]), are reported. The correction for zero N retention, reduced the AME value of soybean meal samples from different origins from 9.9 to 17.8% with increasing N retention. The magnitude of AME penalization in full-fat soybean samples, imposed by zero N correction, increased from 1.90 to 9.64% with increasing N retention. The Δ AME (AME minus AMEn) in rapeseed meal samples increased from 0.70 to 1.09 MJ/kg as N-retention increased. In maize DDGS samples, the correction for zero N retention increased the magnitude of AME penalization from 5.44 to 8.21% with increasing N retention. For all protein sources, positive correlations ( < 0.001; r = 0.831 to 0.991) were observed between the N retention and Δ AME. The present data confirms that correcting AME values to zero N retention for modern broilers penalizes the energy value of protein sources and is of higher magnitude for ingredients with higher protein quality. Feed formulation based on uncorrected AME values could benefit least cost broiler feed formulations and merits further investigation.

Keywords

References

  1. Poult Sci. 2014 Oct;93(10):2567-77 [PMID: 25125560]
  2. Br Poult Sci. 2019 Aug;60(4):404-413 [PMID: 30995865]
  3. Br Poult Sci. 2021 Apr;62(2):278-284 [PMID: 33213191]
  4. Poult Sci. 2013 Dec;92(12):3176-83 [PMID: 24235228]
  5. Poult Sci. 2008 Feb;87(2):298-306 [PMID: 18212373]
  6. Poult Sci. 1984 May;63(5):1008-12 [PMID: 6728787]
  7. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Sep;28(9):1335-44 [PMID: 26194230]
  8. Poult Sci. 2020 Dec;99(12):6809-6817 [PMID: 33248596]
  9. Poult Sci. 2020 Jan;99(1):385-406 [PMID: 32416823]
  10. Poult Sci. 2011 Sep;90(9):1999-2007 [PMID: 21844266]
  11. Poult Sci. 1999 Oct;78(10):1464-71 [PMID: 10536797]
  12. Springerplus. 2016 May 23;5(1):693 [PMID: 27350926]
  13. J Nutr. 1958 Apr 10;64(4):587-603 [PMID: 13549992]
  14. J Nutr. 2001 Apr;131(4):1309-18 [PMID: 11285343]
  15. Anim Nutr. 2021 Jun;7(2):268-281 [PMID: 34258415]
  16. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;26(10):1474-83 [PMID: 25049730]
  17. Poult Sci. 2007 Aug;86(8):1696-704 [PMID: 17626816]
  18. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014 Jul;27(7):917-25 [PMID: 25050031]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0NretentionAMEenergyproteinsoybeanmealzerosamplesincreased0sourcescorrection9increasingmagnitudepresentinvestigationAMEndatafull-fatrapeseedmaizevaluepenalization1ΔvalueshigherFeedApparentMetabolizableEnergyapparentmetabolizablesixevaluationassaysinvolvingfourdistiller'sdriedgrainssolubles[DDGS]reportedreduceddifferentorigins178%imposed9064%minus7009MJ/kgN-retentionDDGS544821%positivecorrelations<001r=831991observedconfirmscorrectingmodernbroilerspenalizesingredientsqualityformulationbaseduncorrectedbenefitleastcostbroilerfeedformulationsmeritsApplicationversusNitrogen-CorrectedPoultryFormulations:ContinuingConundrumnitrogennitrogen-correctedpoultry

Similar Articles

Cited By (5)