The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on transportation employment: A comparative analysis.

Elizabeth A Mack, Shubham Agrawal, Sicheng Wang
Author Information
  1. Elizabeth A Mack: Department of Geography, the Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
  2. Shubham Agrawal: Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
  3. Sicheng Wang: Department of Geography, the Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a variety of social, economic, and environmental changes. This paper examines the employment-related impacts of the pandemic on workers in the transportation industry compared to other industries, and within different transportation sectors. We estimated random effects logistic regression models to test the following three hypotheses using the monthly Current Population Survey micro-data. One, the transportation industry experienced a greater incidence of unemployment than other industries. Two, there is heterogeneity in employment impacts within the transportation sector. Three, specific sectors within the transportation industry experienced more employment impacts than other essential industries, as designated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Phase 1a vaccination guidelines. Model results highlight that workers in the transportation sector were 20.6% more likely to be unemployed because of the pandemic than workers in non-transportation industries. Model results also indicate large intra-sector heterogeneities in employment impacts within the transportation sector. Taxi and limousine drivers were 28 times more likely to be unemployed compared to essential workers. Scenic and sightseeing transportation workers were 23.8 times more likely to be unemployed compared to essential workers. On the other end of the spectrum, however, postal workers and pipeline workers were 84% and 67% less likely to be unemployed compared to essential workers, respectively. From a policy perspective, these results suggest that attention to several aspects of transportation work is needed in the coming years to prepare for future interruptions to the transportation industry.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Ind Med. 2020 Aug;63(8):659-662 [PMID: 32452556]
  2. J Transp Geogr. 2020 Dec;89:102894 [PMID: 33519126]
  3. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Sep;110:58-70 [PMID: 34608359]
  4. J Air Transp Manag. 2021 Jul;94:102062 [PMID: 33875908]
  5. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100166 [PMID: 34173457]
  6. J Transp Health. 2020 Mar;16:100853 [PMID: 32337154]
  7. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 04;69(35):1198-1203 [PMID: 32881851]
  8. Transportation (Amst). 2022;49(2):735-764 [PMID: 33907339]
  9. J Econ Surv. 2021 Sep;35(4):1007-1044 [PMID: 34230772]
  10. Cureus. 2020 Apr 14;12(4):e7668 [PMID: 32313784]
  11. J Reg Sci. 2021 Sep;61(4):753-774 [PMID: 34230690]
  12. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Jul;6:100150 [PMID: 34171019]
  13. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2021 Jun;148:64-78 [PMID: 35702388]
  14. J Econ Race Policy. 2020;3(4):270-281 [PMID: 35300201]
  15. Ocean Coast Manag. 2021 Aug 1;209:105660 [PMID: 36567875]
  16. Transp Res Rec. 2023 Apr;2677(4):531-546 [PMID: 38602901]
  17. Transp Policy (Oxf). 2021 Sep;110:225-237 [PMID: 34608362]
  18. Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 1;190(7):1234-1242 [PMID: 33372209]
  19. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Nov;8:100242 [PMID: 34173478]
  20. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020 Oct;68:101693 [PMID: 32839706]
  21. Lancet. 2020 May 23;395(10237):1587 [PMID: 32446399]
  22. J Air Transp Manag. 2020 Oct;89:101928 [PMID: 32952320]
  23. Can J Public Health. 2021 Jun;112(3):376-390 [PMID: 33650060]
  24. Public Health Rep. 2021 Mar-Apr;136(2):245-252 [PMID: 33400622]
  25. J Transp Health. 2020 Sep;18:100877 [PMID: 32501420]
  26. J Econ Inequal. 2021;19(3):509-526 [PMID: 34366750]
  27. J Public Econ. 2020 Sep;189:104235 [PMID: 32834177]
  28. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract. 2021 Mar;145:269-283 [PMID: 36569966]
  29. J Transp Geogr. 2020 Jun;86:102749 [PMID: 32834670]
  30. J Public Trans. 2020 Jan;22(1):1-21 [PMID: 36118518]
  31. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2021 Jun;10:100338 [PMID: 34514368]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0workerstransportationimpactspandemicindustrycomparedindustrieswithinessentiallikelyunemployedCOVID-19employmentsectorresultssectorsexperiencedModeltimesTransportationcausedvarietysocialeconomicenvironmentalchangespaperexaminesemployment-relateddifferentestimatedrandomeffectslogisticregressionmodelstestfollowingthreehypothesesusingmonthlyCurrentPopulationSurveymicro-dataOnegreaterincidenceunemploymentTwoheterogeneityThreespecificdesignatedCentersDiseaseControlPreventionCDCPhase1avaccinationguidelineshighlight206%non-transportationalsoindicatelargeintra-sectorheterogeneitiesTaxilimousinedrivers28Scenicsightseeing238endspectrumhoweverpostalpipeline84%67%lessrespectivelypolicyperspectivesuggestattentionseveralaspectsworkneededcomingyearspreparefutureinterruptionsemployment:comparativeanalysisEssentialPandemicsystemsUnemployment

Similar Articles

Cited By (10)